Understanding kinetic architecture: typology, classification, and design strategy

References

• Alkhayyat, J. (2013). Design strategy for adaptive kinetic patterns: Creating a generative design for dynamic solar shading systems (M.Sc. thesis). Manchester, UK: University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Asefi, M. (2009, September 28–October 2). Design management model for transformable architectural structures. In A. Domingo, & C. Lazaro (Eds.), Proceedings of the international association for shell and spatial Structures (IASS), Spain: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Asefi, M. (2010). Transformable and kinetic architectural structures: Design, evaluation and application to intelligent architecture. Berlin: VDM.
   Google Scholar
• Asefi, M., & Foruzandeh, A. (2011). Nature and kinetic architecture: The development of a new type of transformable structure for temporary applications. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(6), 513–526.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, A., & Grech, C. (1992). Connections – Studies in building assembly. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, M. (2008). Materials of interaction: Responsive materials in the design of transformable interactive surfaces. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• El Razaz, Z. (2010). Sustainable vision of kinetic architecture. Journal of Building Appraisal, 5(4), 341–356. doi: 10.1057/jba.2010.5
   Google Scholar
• Fotiadou, A. (2007). Analysis of design support for kinetic structures (MSc). Vienna: Department of Architecture, Vienna University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Fouad, S. (2012). Design methodology: Kinetic architecture (M.Sc. thesis). Alexandria: Architectural Engineering, Alexandria University.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. (2003). Kinetic architectural systems design. In R. Kronenburg (Ed.), Transportable environments 2 (pp. 163–186). London & New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. (2010). Sustainable applications of intelligent kinetic systems. Cambridge, MA: Kinetic Design Group, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive architecture. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M., & Yeh, B. (2000). Managing interactions in smart environments, Springer, 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, N. (2011). Investigation of highly flexible, deployable structures: Review, modelling, control, experiments and application. Budapest: Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, N., & Farkas, G. (2011). Roof structures in motion – On retractable and deployable roof structures enabling quick construction or adaption to external excitations. Concrete Structures, 12, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, D. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, P., & Sørensen, J. (2009, September 28–October 2). Robustness analysis of kinetic structures. In A. Domingo, & C. Lazaro (Eds.), Proceedings of the international association for shell and spatial structures (IASS). Spain: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Knippers, J., Scheible, F., Oppe, M., & Jungjohann, H. (2012). Kinetic media façade consisting of GFRP louvers. In International conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering CICE 2012, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Kolarevic, B. (2015). Towards architecture of change. In B. Kolarevic, & V. Parlac (Eds.), Building dynamics: Exploring architecture of change (pp. 1–16). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenburg, R. (2014). Architecture in motion: The history and development of portable building. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2012). Adaptable, kinetic, responsive, and transformable architecture: An alternative approach to sustainable design (M.Sc. thesis). Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Lienhard, J. (2014). Bending-active structures: Form-finding strategies using elastic deformation in static and kinetic systems and the structural potentials therein. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart – Institut für Tragkonstruktionen und Konstruktives Entwerfen.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, F. (2012). One ocean – Thematic pavilion for EXPO 2012. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from http://www.detail-online.com/article/one-ocean-thematic-pavilion-for-expo-2012-16339/
   Google Scholar
• Megahed, N. (2015). Digital realm: Parametric-enabled paradigm in architectural design process. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 4(3), 175–184. doi: 10.7492/IJAEC.2015.018
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, J. (2011). Designing kinetics for architectural facades: State change. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osório, F., Paio, A., & Oliveira, S. (2014, May 14–16). KOS – Kinetic origami surface. In Rethinking comprehensive design: Speculative counterculture, proceedings of the 19th international conference on computer-aided architectural design research in Asia (CAADRIA 2014) (pp. 201–210). Kyoto.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, F., & Burkhardt, B. (1972). IL Five: Convertible roofs, issue 5 of information of the institute for lightweight structures series. New York: George Wittenborn Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Oungrinis, K. (2013, October 11–12). Implementation of kinetic systems in architecture: A classification of techniques and mechanisms appropriate for discreet building parts. In Proceeding of international conference on adaptation and movement in architecture (ICAMA2013), Toronto: Ryerson University, Department of Architectural Science.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, A. (2009). Phrases of the kinetic: Dynamic physicality as a dimension of the design process. School of architecture and planning. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Parlac, V. (2015). Exploring responsiveness in architecture. In B. Kolarevic, & V. Parlac (Eds.), Building dynamics: Exploring architecture of change (pp. 191–204). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, F. (1968). Origins and development of kinetic art. London: Studio Vista.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-del-Valle, C. (2005). Adaptive kinetic structures: A portal to digital prototyping. In Proceedings ACADIA’05: Smart architecture, Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA). SCAD/Savannah: Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Sherbini, K., & Krawczyk, R. (2004, December). Overview of intelligent architecture. In 1st ASCAAD international conference, e-design in architecture (pp. 137–152). Dhahran: KFUPM.
   Google Scholar
• Sorguç, A., Hagiwara, I., & Selçuk, S. (2009). Origamics in architecture: A medium of inquiry or design in architecture. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 26(2), 235–247. doi: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.12
   Google Scholar
• Susam, G. (2013). A research on a reconfigurable hypar structure for architectural applications (M.Sc.). Izmir: İzmir Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, C. (2013). Transformable and transportable architecture: Analysis of buildings components and strategies for project design. Barcelona: Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki-Neagu, M., & de Silva, C. (2007, October). Development of design workflows for kinetic structures using fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of association for computer-aided design in architecture conference, expanding bodies in art, cities and the environment (pp. 250–259). Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University Faculty of Architecture and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Zuk, W., & Clark, R. (1970). Kinetic architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar