Case study: developing campus spaces through co-creation

References

• Aalto, L., & Saari, A. (2009). Re‐engineering of the meal logistics in a sheltered house for elderly people. Facilities, 27(3/4), 120–137.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2000). University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity. Higher Education, 40(4), 409–422.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Davies, F., & Barrett, L. (2015). Clever classrooms: Summary report of the HEAD project. Manchester: University of Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Begg, D., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R. (2008). Economics (9th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, B., Ouyang, Q., Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Hu, H., & Deng, G. (2012). Development of a multivariate regression model for overall satisfaction in public buildings based on field studies in Beijing and Shanghai. Build Environment, 47, 394–399.
   Google Scholar
• Elf, M., Fröst, P., Lindahl, G., & Wijk, H. (2015). Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments – time to begin improving quality. BMC Health Services Research, 15(114). doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0782-7
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S., & Ruikar, K. (2013). Collaborative design management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Anderman, L., & Jensen, J. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203-220
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave. Redefining knowledge for the postindustrial age. Education Canada, 47(3), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32(2), 4–20. doi:10.1108/00251749410054774
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. (1996). Relationship marketing: Strategic and tactical implications. Management Decision, 34(3), 5–14. doi:10.1108/00251749610113613
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C., & Voima P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150. doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. (2008). The process is the product: Collaborative design in four Silicon Valley schools. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8, 200–205. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:4(200)
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A., & Hutton, L. (2014). Design for the changing educational landscape. Space, place and the future of learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Höykinpuro, R., & Ropo, A. (2014). Visual narratives on organizational space. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(5), 780–792. doi:10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0174
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, P. (2003). Designing more effective on-campus teaching and learning spaces: A role for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1/2), 119–133. doi:10.1080/1360144042000277991
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, P., Fischer, K., Gilding, T., Taylor, P. G., & Trevitt, A. C. F. (2000). Place and space in the design of new learning environments. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the Brain in Mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. A. (2009). Design integration of facilities management: A challenge of knowledge transfer. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(3), 124–135.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran's quality handbook (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, T., Kallio, K. M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity – a longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411. doi:10.1108/F-09-2013-0074
   Google Scholar
• Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., & Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2001). Assessing the suitability of current briefing practices in construction within a concurrent engineering framework. International Journal of Project Management, 19(6), 337–351. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00015-6
   Google Scholar
• Kpamma, Z., Adjei-Kumi, T., Ayarkwa, J., & Adinyira, E. (2016). An exploration of the choosing by advantages decision system as a user engagement tool in participatory design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/17452007.2015.1095710
   Google Scholar
• Kuuskorpi, M., & González, C. (2011). The future of the physical learning environment: School facilities that support the user. CELE Exchange, Centre for Effective Learning Environments, 2011/11. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/20727925
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative design: What is it? Automation in Construction, 9, 409–415. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00025-4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., & Schottenfeld, M. A. (2014). Collaborative knowledge creation in the higher academic library. Journal of Learning Spaces, 3(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lennertz, B., & Lutzenhiser, A. (2006). The charrette handbook. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, G. A. (2004). The innovative workplace: An analytical model focusing on the relationship between spatial and organisational issues. Facilities, 22(9/10), 253–258. doi:10.1108/02632770410555977
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, G., Todd, J. A., Hayter, S. J., & Ellis, P. G. (2009). A handbook for planning and conducting charrettes for high-performance projects (2nd ed.). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from http://www.nrel.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, P. C. (2002). Understanding activity settings in relationship to the design of learning environments. CAE Net Quarterly Newsletter. AIA Committee on Architecture for Education. Retrieved from http://www.aia.org/
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, P. C. (2013, February 3). Designing collaborative spaces for schools. The Journal, Learning Environments. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Home.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Love, P., & Gunasekaran, A. (1997). Concurrent engineering in the construction industry. Concurrent Engineering, 5(2), 155–162. doi:10.1177/1063293X9700500207
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, T. (2015). Multi-disciplinary discourse on design-related issues in construction site meetings. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 231–238. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00172-0
   Google Scholar
• Naaranoja, M., Ketola, P., & Niemi, O. (2015). Charrette supports facility development – Case Musica. In S. Nenonen et al. (Eds.), How to co-create campus? (pp. 180–195). Tampere: University Properties of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• The National Charrette Institute. (2011). The NCI charrette system. The breakthrough planning tool for community transformation. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from http://www.charretteinstitute.org
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G. (2005). Leading. the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1995). The implications of the knowledge-based economy for future science and technology policies, OCDE/GD (95)136. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, M., Lee, J., Hong, S. W., & Jeong, Y. (2015). Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design. Automation in Construction, 58, 196–206. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.015
   Google Scholar
• Piroozfar, P., Adeyeye, K., Rosenkind, M., & Winstanley, G. (2013). A co-creation platform for post-occupancy decision support. Journal of Facilities Management, 11(2), 101–122. doi:10.1108/14725961311314598
   Google Scholar
• Plume, J., & Mitchell, J. (2007). Collaborative design using a shared IFC building model – learning from experience. Automation in Construction, 16, 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2005.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prokou, E. (2008). The emphasis on employability and the changing role of the university in Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 33(4), 387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Prue, C. (2003). Classrooms for the future: An adventure in design and research. ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly, 7(3/4), 244–261.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D., & Tibbetts, B. (2009). Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design. Proceedings of the next generation learning spaces 2008 colloquium. Brisbane: University of Queensland and the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rekola, M., Kojima, J., & Mäkeläinen, T. (2010). Towards integrated design and delivery solutions: Pinpointed challenges of process change. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(4), 264–278.
   Google Scholar
• Rooke, J., Sapountzis, S., Koskela, L., Codinhoto, R., & Kagioglou, M. (2010). Lean knowledge management: The problem of value. Proceedings IGLC-18, July 2010, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Salem, M. (2014). The role of universities in building a knowledge-based economy in Saudi Arabia. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 13(5), 1047–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian, R. (2010) Integrated design and engineering using building information modelling: A pilot project of small-scale housing development in the Netherlands. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(2), 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Gaved, M. (2013). Innovating pedagogy 2013. Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers (Open University Innovation Report 2). Milton Keynes: The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/
   Google Scholar
• Siva, J. P. S., & London, K. (2011). Investigating the role of client learning for successful architect–client relationships on private single dwelling projects. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(3), 177–189. doi:10.1080/17452007.2011.594570
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, A., Dunne, J., & Boussabaine, H. (2012). Schools design quality: A user perspective. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(4), 257–272. doi:10.1080/17452007.2012.683768
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357–442.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (2012). A place to learn: Lessons from research on learning environments (Technical paper no. 9). Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-H. (2012). Enculturing self-directed seamless learners towards a facilitated seamless learning process framework mediated by mobile technology. Paper presented at the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, Takamatsu, Japan. doi:10.1109/WMUTE.2012.9
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar