Building design management – key success factors

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., & Langlo, J. A. (2016). Productivity and performance measurement in the construction sector. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the CIB World Building Congress 2016. Volume IV - Understanding Impacts and Functioning of Different Solutions Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. (2000). The last planner system of production control (PhD dissertation). Civil Engineering, The University of Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., & Koskela, L. (1998). On the agenda of design management research. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 13–15 August, Guarujá, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams, implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. doi: 10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Google Scholar
• Bølviken, T. (2012). On the categorization of production: The organization-product matrix. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 18–­20 July, San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bølviken, T., Gullbrekken, B., & Nyseth, K. (2010). Collaborative design management. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 14–16 July, Haifa, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, A., & Worthington, J. (2001). Managing the brief for better design. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. (2003). Design project management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bråthen, K. (2015). Collaboration with BIM – learning from the front runners in the Norwegian industry. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, 21, 439–445.
   Google Scholar
• Caixeta, M. C. B. F., & Fabricio, M. M. (2013). A conceptual model for the design process of interventions in healthcare buildings: A method to improve design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9(2), 95–109. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2012.738040
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., Scott, D., & Chan, A. (2004). Factors affecting the success of a construction project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 153–155. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153)
   Google Scholar
• Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The ‘real’ success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185–190. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A., Green, S., & Bagilhole, B. (2007). People and culture in construction: A reader. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Z., Ng, F., & Li, J. (2014). A parallel multiple mediator model of knowledge sharing in architectural design project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, S. Z., Kiliç algici, P., Arditi, D., & Günaydin, H. M. (2015). Critical success factors of partnering in the building design process. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 32(2), 61–77. doi: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2015.2.4
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (2008). Management. New York, NY: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• El. Reifi, M. H., Emmitt, S., & Ruikar, K. (2013). Developing a conceptual lean briefing process model for lean design management. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Fortaleza, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S. (2016). The construction design manager – a rapidly evolving innovation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(2), 138–148. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2015.1136519
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S., & Ruikar, K. (2013). Collaborative design management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, J. (2013). The design manager’s handbook. Chicester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, A. (2009). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flager, F., Welle, B., Bansal, P., Soremekun, G., & Haymaker, J. (2009). Multidisciplinary process integration & design optimization of a classroom building. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 14, 595–612.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006, April). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Google Scholar
• Fundli, I. S., & Drevland, F. (2014). Collaborative design management – a case study paper presented at the IGLC-22Oslo, Norway, 25–27 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadi, S., & D’Ambra, J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams: A coopetitive model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 285–301. doi: 10.1108/13673271211218889
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson, A. L. (2006). Briefing: Measuring the value of design. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Municipal Engineer, 159(3), 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (1994). The successful management of design: A handbook of building design management. Reading: Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C., & Hughes, W. (2001). Building design management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. K., & Olsson, N. O. E. (2011). Layered project-layered process: Lean thinking and flexible solutions. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(2), 70–84. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2011.582331
   Google Scholar
• Jerrard, B., Ingram, J., & Hands, D. (2002). Design management case studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerosuo, H. (2015). BIM-based collaboration across organizational and disciplinary boundaries through knotworking. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, 21, 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Knotten, V., Svalestuen, F., Hansen, G. K., & Lædre, O. (2015a). Design management in the building process – a review of current literature. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, 21(0), 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Knotten, V., Svalestuen, F., Hansen, G. K., & Lædre, O. (2015b). Design management in the building process: A review of current literature. Paper presented at the 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization. Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsikouri, D., Austin, S., & Dainty, A. (2008). Critical success factors in collaborative multi-disciplinary design projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(3), 198–226. doi: 10.1108/17260530810918243
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, K. H. (2013). Building design management: Management of the cooperative design and its interdisciplinary functions (Vol. 180). Trondheim: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Kärnä, S., & Junnonen, J. M. (2017). Designers’ performance evaluation in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 154–169. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-06-2015-0101
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., & Edwards, D. J. (2003). Learning to reduce rework in projects: Analysis of firm’s organizational learning and quality practices. Project Management Journal, 34(3), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, G. (2001). Extreme collaboration. Forthcoming in Communications of the ACM, December, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Mejlænder-Larsen, Ø. (2015). Generalising via the case studies and adapting the oil and gas industry’s project execution concepts to the construction industry. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, 21, 271–278.
   Google Scholar
• Meland, Ø. (2000). Prosjekteringsledelse i byggeprosessen: suksesspåvirker eller andres alibi for fiasko? (Vol. 116). Trondheim: [Tapir].
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Hamilton, K., Tesler, R., Mancuso, V., & McNeese, M. (2015). Time for temporal team mental models: Expanding beyond ‘what’ and ‘how’ to incorporate ‘when’. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 693–709. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1024664
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, N. (2009). Fleksibilitet i prosjekter: et tveegget sverd (Vol. nr. 1). Trondheim: Concept-programmet.
   Google Scholar
• Otter, A., & Emmitt, S. (2008). Design team communication and design task complexity: The preference for dialogues. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(2), 121–129. doi: 10.3763/aedm.2008.0072
   Google Scholar
• Oyedele, L. O. (2010). Sustaining architects’ and engineers’ motivation in design firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(2), 180–196. doi: 10.1108/09699981011024687
   Google Scholar
• PMBOK. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK guide). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B., & Jacobsen, D. I. (2011). Læreren med forskerblikk: innføring i vitenskapelig metode for lærerstudenter. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforl.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samset, K. (2010). Early project appraisal: Making the initial choices. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanvido, V. E., & Parfitt, M. K. (1993). Checklist of critical success factors for building projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(3), 243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D. (2011). Leading the team an architect’s guide to design management. London: RIBA.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review (November 2007), 85(11), 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Svalestuen, F., Frøystad, K., Drevland, F., Ahmad, S., Lohne, J., & Lædre, O. (2015). Key elements to an effective building design team. Procedia Computer Science, 64(Conference on Project Management, ProjMAN), 838–843. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.636
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• VERBI. (2015). MAXQDA 12. Retrieved from http://www.maxqda.com
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. F., Tang, W. Z., Qi, D. S., Shen, W. X., & Huang, M. (2016). Enhancing design management by partnering in delivery of international EPC projects: Evidence from Chinese construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(4), 04015099-1–04015099-12. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001082
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zidane, Y. J. T., Stordal, K. B., Johansen, A., & Van Raalte, S. (2015). Barriers and challenges in employing of concurrent engineering within the Norwegian construction projects. 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, 21, 494–501.
   Google Scholar