Modularising design processes of façades in Denmark: re-exploring the use of design structure matrix

References

• Arif, M., & Egbu, C. (2010). Making a case for offsite construction in China. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 17(6), 536–548. doi: 10.1108/09699981011090170
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2006). Modularity in the design of Complex engineering systems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 02163.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N. G., Pendlebury, M., Gibb, A., & Pasquire, C. (2005). Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(3), 153–162, doi:10.1080/17452007.2005.9684590
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. (2003) Design project management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 292–306. doi:10.1109/17.946528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, D., & Camuffo, A. (2009). The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. H., & Eppinger, S. D. (2005). A simulation based process model for managing complex design projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(3), 316–328. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2005.850722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIBSE. (2004). Retrieved from Society of Façade Engineering http://www.cibse.org/society-of-façade-engineering-sfe/about-sfe
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, M. (1989). Building theories form case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S. (2010). Design management in architecture, engineering and construction: Origins and trends. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, 5(3): 29. [ ISSN 19811543].
   Google Scholar
• Eppinger, S. D., & Browning, T. R. (2012). Design structure matrix methods and applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparri, E., Lucchini, A., Mantegazza, G., & Mazzucchelli, E. S. (2015). Construction management for tall CLT buildings: From partial to total prefabrication of façade elements. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 10(3), 256–275. doi:10.1080/17480272.2015.1075589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990. doi: 10.1108/01443571111165848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, A. G. F., & Isack, F. (2003). Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 146–160. doi: 10.1080/09613210302000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, J. S., Rahimian, F. P., Arif, M., & Sharp, M. D. (2015). New offsite production and business models in construction: Priorities for the future research agenda. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.891501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, M., Lu, W., Stehn, L., & Jansson, G. (2015). An indicator for superfluous iteration in offsite building design processes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(5), 360–375. doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.937793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008) Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), 953–966. doi: 10.1080/01446190802259043
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, G., Johnsson, H., & Engström, D. (2013). Platform use in system building. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1–2), 70–82. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.793376
   Google Scholar
• Linde, B. V. (2012). The design process of complex architectural Façades. Council on tall buildings an urban habitat 2012, 9th World Congress (p. 45). Permasteelisa Group, Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, U. (2009). The design structure matrix (DSM). Retrieved from http://www.dsmweb.org/en/dsm.html
   Google Scholar
• Nadim, W., & Goulding, J. S. (2011). Offsite production: A model for building down barriers: A European construction industry perspective. Journal of Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(1), 82–101. doi: 10.1108/09699981111098702
   Google Scholar
• Oehmen, J., Thuesen, C., Parraguez, P., & Geraldi, J. (2015). Complexity management for projects, programmes, and portfolios: An engineering systems perspective (PMI White Paper). Project Management Institute, PMI.
   Google Scholar
• Oloufa, A. A., Hosni, Y. A., Fayez, M., & Axelsson, P. (2004). Using DSM for modeling information flow in construction design projects. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 21(2), 105–125, doi:10.1080/10286600310001638474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pektas, S. T., & Pultar, M. (2006). Modelling detailed information flows in building design with the parameter-based design structure matrix. Design Studies, 27, 99–122. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sako, M. (2003). Modularity and outsourcing; the business of systems integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Saramäki, M. K. (2007). Generalization of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Helsinki: Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, D. V. (1981). The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28, 71–74. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuesen, C., Jensen, J. S., & Gottlieb, S. C. (2009). Making the long tail work: Reflections on the development of the construction industry the past 25 years. In A. Dainty (Ed.), Proceedings of 25th annual ARCOM conference: 7–9 September 2009 (Vol. 2, pp. 1111–1120). Nottingham: ARCOM – Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzopoulos, P., & Cooper, R. (2007). Design management from a contractor’s perspective: The need for clarity. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K., & Tung, K. (1991). Fundamentals of product modularity. Issues in Design/Manufacture Integrationm 39, 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann, K. F. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, D. C., Wyatt, D. F., Nair, S. M. T., & Clarkson, P. J. (2010). An introduction to the Cambridge Advanced Modeller. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar