Applying a decision-making framework for resolving conflicts when selecting windows and blinds

References

• Acosta, I., Munoz, C., Campano, M. A., & Navarro, J. (2015). Analysis of daylight factors and energy saving allowed by windows under overcast sky conditions. Renewable Energy, 77, 194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altomonte, S. (2009). Daylight for energy savings and psycho-physiological well-being in sustainable built environments. Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3), 4–16. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v1n3p3
   Google Scholar
• Atzeri, A. M., Cappelletti, F., Gasparella, A., & Tzempelikos, A. (2013). Office energy needs and indoor comfort with different types of external roller shades in a southern European climate. Proceedings of IBPSA, 13, 2626–2633.
   Google Scholar
• Avasoo, D. (2007). The european window energy labelling challenge. Proceedings of the European council for an energy efficient economy (ECEEE) summer study (pp. 4–9).
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, P., Hunter, C., & Howlett, O. (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Troy, New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bülow-Hübe, H. (2007). Solar shading and daylight redirection. (Report EBD-R-07/15). Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Carlucci, S., Cattarin, G., Causone, F., & Pagliano, L. (2015b). Multi-objective optimization of a nearly zero-energy building based on thermal and visual discomfort minimization using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Energy and Buildings, 104, 378–394. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y.-C., & Tzempelikos, A. (2015). Daylighting and energy analysis of multi-sectional facades. Energy Procedia, 78, 189–194. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.138.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, K. J. C., & Kiang, S. (2010). Evaluating the performance of shading devices and glazing types to promote energy efficiency of residential buildings. Building Simulation, 3, 181–194. doi: 10.1007/s12273-010-0007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, T., & Ng, R. (2016). The application of analytic hierarchy process in daylighting performance assessment. Indoor and Built Environment, 25(1), 50–68. doi:10.1177/1420326X14525061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carli, M. D. G. Valeria. (2009). Optimization of daylight in buildings to save energy and to improve visual comfort: Analysis in different latitudes. 11th international IBPSA conference (pp. 1797–1805). IBPSA Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, M.-C. (2001). Impact of shading devices on daylight quality in offices.simulations with radiance. Lund university. Lund: Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Elitfonster. (2016). Retrieved from www.elitfonster.se
   Google Scholar
• Frontczak, M., Andersen, R. V., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Questionnaire survey on factors influencing comfort with indoor environmental quality in Danish housing. Building and Environment, 50, 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, J., & Fiorito, F. (2015). Daylight design of office buildings: Optimisation of external solar shadings by using combined simulation methods. Buildings, 5(2), 560–580. doi:10.3390/buildings5020560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M., Dipasquale, C., Poppi, S., Bellini, A., Fedrizzi, R., Bales, C., … Holmberg, S. (2017). Economic and environmental analysis of energy renovation packages for European office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 148, 155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M., Gustafsson, M. S., Myhren, J. A., Bales, C., & Holmberg, S. (2016). Techno-economic analysis of energy renovation measures for a district heated multi-family house. Applied Energy, 177, 108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadas, Y., & Nahum, O. E. (2016). Urban bus network of priority lanes: A combined multi-objective, multi-criteria and group decision-making approach. Transport Policy, 52, 186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotman, E. (2005). Base reference analytical hierarchy process for engineering process selection. International conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems (pp. 184–190). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ISO7730-Standard. (2005). 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment—Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jalilzadehazhari, E., Johansson, P., Johansson, J., & Mahapatra, K. (2018). Developing a decision-making framework for resolving conflicts when selecting windows and blinds. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2018.1537235
   Google Scholar
• Kämpf, J. H., Wetter, M., & Robinson, D. (2010). A comparison of global optimization algorithms with standard benchmark functions and real-world applications using EnergyPlus. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3(2), 103–120. doi: 10.1080/19401490903494597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaguzel, O. T., Zhang, R., Lam, K. P., & Perlman, J. (2003). Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings. Building Simulation, 7, 111–121. doi: 10.1007/s12273-013-0128-5
   Google Scholar
• Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: A report to California’s sustainable building task force. California. Retrieved from http://evanmills.lbl.gov/pubs/pdf/green_buildings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., & Tavil, A. (2007). Energy and visual comfort performance of electrochromic windows with overhangs. Building and Environment, 42(6), 2439–2449. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainini, A. G., Bonato, D., Poli, T., & Speroni, A. (2015). Lean strategies for window retrofit of Italian office buildings: Impact on energy use, thermal and visual comfort. Energy Procedia, 70, 719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.181
   Google Scholar
• Mangkuto, R. A., Rohmah, M., & Asri, A. D. (2016). Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: A case study of buildings in the tropics. Applied Energy, 164, 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Månsson, L., & Schönbeck, Å. (2003). Light & Room, guide for planning of indoor lighting [In Swedish: Ljus & rum: planeringsguide för belysning inomhus]. Stockholm, Sweden: Ljuskultur.
   Google Scholar
• Manzan, M., & Padovan, R. (2015). Multi-criteria energy and daylighting optimization for an office with fixed and moveable shading devices. Advances in Building Energy Research, 9(2), 238–252. doi:10.1080/17512549.2015.1014839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monghasemi, S., Nikoo, M. R., Fasaee, M. A. K., & Adamowski, J. (2015). A novel multi criteria decision making model for optimizing time–cost–quality trade-off problems in construction projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3089–3104. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National board of housing building and planning. (2002). Regulations of national board of housing building and planning regarding changes to the building’s building rules, [In Swedish: Boverkets föreskrifter om ändring i verkets byggregler]. Karlskrona, Sweden: National board of housing, building and planning, [In Swedish: Boverket].
   Google Scholar
• National board of housing building and planning. (2015). Building regulation [In Swedish: Boverkets byggregler, BFS 2011: 6 med ändringar till och med 2015: 3]. National board of housing, building and planning. [In Swedish: Boverket].
   Google Scholar
• Nikoofard, S., Ugursal, V. I., & Beausoleil-Morrison, I. (2014). Technoeconomic assessment of the impact of window shading retrofits on the heating and cooling energy consumption and GHG emissions of the Canadian housing stock. Energy and Buildings, 69, 354–366. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, W., Kapsis, K., & Athienitis, A. K. (2013). Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review. Building and Environment, 60, 319–338. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C. E., Aries, M. B. C., van Loenen, E. J., & Hensen, J. (2012). Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort. Applied Energy, 95, 238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordouei, M. H., Elkamel, A., Dusseault, M. B., & Alhajri, I. (2015). New sustainability indices for product design employing environmental impact and risk reduction: Case study on gasoline blends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(Part A), 312–320. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.126.
   Google Scholar
• Pourshaghaghy, A., & Omidvari, M. (2012). Examination of thermal comfort in a hospital using PMV–PPD model. Applied Ergonomics, 43(6), 1089–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R., Yamín Garretón, J., & Pattini, A. (2016). Glare and cognitive performance in screen work in the presence of sunlight. Lighting Research & Technology, 48(2), 221–238. doi: 10.1177/1477153515577851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
   Google Scholar
• SageGlass. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.sageglass.com/en
   Google Scholar
• Sbar, N. L., Podbelski, L., Yang, H. M., & Pease, B. (2012). Electrochromic dynamic windows for office buildings. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1(1), 125–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2012.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Lazarus, I., & Kishore, V. (2015). Effect of internal woven roller shade and glazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of shillong. Applied Energy, 159, 317–333. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suga, K., Kato, S., & Hiyama, K. (2010). Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: An application to outer window design problems using multiple objective genetic algorithms. Building and Environment, 45(5), 1144–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agancy. (2017). Energy situation [Title in Swedish: Energiläget]. Bromma, Sweden: S. e. agancy.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Standard Institute. (2011). SS-EN 12464-1:2011. Light and lighting – Lighting of work places –Part 1: Indoor work places [In Swedish: Ljus och belysning – Belysning av arbetsplatser –Del 1: Arbetsplatser inomhus].
   Google Scholar
• Tsikaloudaki, K., Laskos, K., Theodosiou, T., & Bikas, D. (2012). Assessing cooling energy performance of windows for office buildings in the Mediterranean zone. Energy and Buildings, 49, 192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warema. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.warema.com/en/
   Google Scholar
• Wetter, M., & Wright, J. (2003). Comparison of a generalized pattern search and a genetic algorithm optimization method. Proceedings of the 8th international IBPSA conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands (pp. 1401–1408).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. A. M. Monjur (2009). Geometric optimization of fenestration.
   Google Scholar
• Zemella, G., De March, D., Borrotti, M., & Poli, I. (2011). Optimised design of energy efficient building façades via evolutionary neural networks. Energy and Buildings, 43(12), 3297–3302. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., & Dear, R. (2017). University students’ cognitive performance under temperature cycles induced by direct load control events. Indoor Air, 27(1), 78–93. doi: 10.1111/ina.12296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar