Integrated project team performance in early design stages – performance indicators influencing effectiveness in bridge design

References

• Abalo, J., Varela, J., & Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for importance-performance analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaloushi, H., & Skitmore, M. (2008). Supply chain management in the UAE construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 8(1), 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Al Mousli, M. H., & El-Sayegh, S. M. (2016). Assessment of the design–construction interface problems in the UAE. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(5), 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anumba, C. J., Baugh, C., & Khalfan, M. M. (2002). Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5), 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anumba, C., Kamara, J., & Cutting-Decelle, A.-F. (2007). Concurrent engineering in construction projects. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Azzopardi, E., & Nash, R. (2013). A critical evaluation of importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 35, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. (2003). Looking beyond processes: Human factors in team integration. In D. J. Greenwood (Ed.), 19th annual ARCOM conference (Vol. 1, pp. 233–242). Brighton: University of Brighton. Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2006). The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B. L., Rodriguez, D. A., & Vaske, J. J. (2002). Enhancing importance-performance analysis through segmentation. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 12(1), 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19. Analysis, 1st ed., 377.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L. E., Jahre, M., & Swärd, A. (2010). Partnering relationships in construction: A literature review. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(4), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R., Zuo, J., Soebarto, V., Zhao, Z., Zillante, G., & Gan, X. (2017). Discovering the transition pathways toward sustainability for construction enterprises: Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(6), 04017013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. (1995). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. Design Studies, 16(2), 143–170.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, A. (1998). Construction as a manufacturing process: Lessons from the automotive industry. Computers & Structures, 67, 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction, The Report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, C. S., & Paek, J. H. (2009). Risk Index model for minimizing environmental disputes in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(1), 34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, C. S. J., Ph, D., Yun, S. H., Ph, D., Paek, J. H., & Ph, D. (2008). Subcontractor evaluation and management framework for strategic partnering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(11), 842–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, M., Mangan, J., Wong, C., Xu, M., & Lalwani, C. (2014). Investigating the different approaches to importance-performance analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 34(12), 1021–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, L. H., & Ahmed, S. M. (2011). Modern construction – lean project delivery and integrated practices. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Forgues, D., & Koskela, L. (2009). The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(3), 370–385.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Gadde, L. E., & Dubois, A. (2010). Partnering in the construction industry – problems and opportunities. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(4), 254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginnett, R. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 71–98). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). Group-level issues in the design and training of cockpit crews. In H. Orlady & H. Foushee (Eds.), NASA. Ames Research Center Cockpit Resource Management Training, San Francisco (pp. 23–39). Washington, DC: NASA Headquarters.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(July), 905–922.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. L., Ginnet, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2013). Leadership: Enhancing the lesson of experience (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Jergeas, G., & Van der Put, J. (2001). Benefits of constructability on construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), 281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephson, P.-E., & Björkman, L. (2011). 31 recommendations for increased profit-reducing waste. Gothenburg: The Centre for Management of the Built Environment, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A. (2002). Förtroende och samverkan i byggprocessen: förutsättningar och erfarenheter. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Press. Harvard Business Review, 71(71), 111–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson, J., Eriksson, P. E., Olofsson, T., & Simonsson, P. (2014). Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: Core elements and barriers. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1–2), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team. Final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractural arrangements in the UK construction industry. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, P. (2001). The performance factor: Unlocking the secrets of teamwork. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H. H., Renzl, B., & Pichler, J. (2004). The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 271–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. R., & Dainty, A. R. J. (1999). Integrated project teams’ performance in managing unexpected change events. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 5(7), 212–222.
   Google Scholar
• Mosey, D. (2009). Early contractor involvement in building procurement: Contracts, partnering and project management. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moum, A. (2006, May). A framework for exploring the ICT impact on the architectural design process. ITcon, 11, 409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland, J., & Marosszeky, M. (2006). Total quality in the construction supply chain. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance – performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22(2001), 617–627.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Amor, R., Palmer, M., Dickinson, J., Tatum, C. B., Kazi, A. S., … East, B. (2010). Challenges for integrated design and delivery solutions. Architectural Engineering and Design Management (UK), 6(4), 232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Radtke, M. W., & Jeffrey, R. S. (1993). Project-level model process for implementing constructability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(4), 813–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempling, R., Fall, D., & Lundgren, K. (2015). Aspects of integrated design of structures: Parametric models, creative space and linked knowledge. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(5), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & Woods, A. L. (2017). The Assessment of Team Performance: Observations and Needs. In A. A. von Davier, M. Zhu, & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Innovative assessment of collaboration (pp. 21–37). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Senaratne, S., & Gunawardane, S. (2015). Application of team role theory to construction design teams. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaratne, S., & Hapuarachchi, A. (2009). Construction project teams and their development: Case studies in Sri Lanka. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(4), 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2012). SOU 2012:39 Vägar till förbättrad produktivitet och innovationsgrad i anläggningsbranschen. Produktivitetskommitén, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsson, P. (2011). Buildability of concrete structures. Luleå University of Technology, Ph.D. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, T., Domingue, J., Zdrahal, Z., Millican, A., & Murray, J. (1999). Moving from on‐the‐job training towards organisational learning. Proceedings of the 12th Banff Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, R. H. (2012). Competitive importance-performance analysis of an Australian wildlife park. Tourism Management, 33(1), 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American Institute of Architects California Council. (2007). Integrated project delivery: A Guide. Chicago: The American Institute of Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket, R. H. (2014). Produktivitetsprogram Broar av seriekaraktär.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uihlein, M. S. (2015). Structural integration in practice: Constructing a framework from the experiences of structural engineers. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 141(3), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247–262.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2016). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation (First ed.). London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Zimina, D., Ballard, G., & Pasquire, C. (2012). Target value design: Using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construction Management and Economics, 30(5), 383–398.
   Google Scholar