Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: the old and the new

References

• Alarcón, L. (1997). Lean construction. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. (1995). Cutting costs and time with DfMA. Mechanical Engineering, 117(3), 74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A., & Hogg, K. (2014). Added value in design and construction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balfour Beatty. (2018). Streamlined construction: Seven steps to offsite and modular building.
   Google Scholar
• Baloi, D., & Price, A. D. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, C., Kotecha, R., Curtis, J., Dee, C., Pitt, N., & Papworth, R. (2018). Enhancing high-rise residential construction through design for manufacture and assembly – a UK case study. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management, Procurement and Law, 171(4), 164–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başarır, B., & Altun, C. M. (2018). A redesign procedure to manufacture adaptive façades with standard products. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 6(3), 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• BCA. (2000). Code of practice on buildable design. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority.
   Google Scholar
• BCA. (2016). BIM for DfMA essential guide. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Bogue, R. (2012). Design for manufacture and assembly: Background, capabilities and applications. Assembly Automation, 32(2), 112–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G. (2005). Assembly automation and product design. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G. (2012). Design for manufacture and assembly: The Boothroyd-Dewhurst experience. In C. M. Eastman (Ed.), Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives (pp. 19–40). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgewater, C. (1993). Principles of design for automation applied to construction tasks. Automation in Construction, 2(1), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K., & Lu, W. (2018). Design for manufacture and assembly oriented design approach to a curtain wall system: A case study of a commercial building in Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 10(7), 2211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Xu, G., Xue, F., Zhong, R. Y., Liu, D., & Lu, W. (2017). A physical internet-enabled BIM system for prefabricated construction. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(4-5), 349–361. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2PLRAM3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Council (CIC). (2019). What is CIC? Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2vBWLVI
   Google Scholar
• Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). (1983). Buildability: An assessment. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giuda, G. M., Giana, P. E., Masera, G., Seghezzi, E., & Villa, V. (2019). A BIM-based approach to façade cladding optimization: Geometrical, economic, and production-control in a DfMA perspective. In 2019 European conference on computing in construction (Vol. 1, pp. 324–331). European Council on Computing in Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C. M. (2012). Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2017). The construction industry’s productivity problem [Electronic Version]. The Economist. Retrieved from April 3, 2019. https://econ.st/2RzMkLW
   Google Scholar
• Emmatty, F. J., & Sarmah, S. P. (2012). Modular product development through platform-based design and DfMA. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(9), 696–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S., Marsh, L., & Cockerham, G. (2001). Design for manufacture: A strategy for successful application to buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 19(5), 493–502.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Jin, R., & Lu, W. (2019). Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: A review. Building Research & Information, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Low, S. P., & Nair, K. (2018). Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA): A preliminary study of factors influencing its adoption in Singapore. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(6), 440–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby, D. A., & Foo, G. (1990). Design for X (DFX): Key to competitive, profitable products. AT&T Technical Journal, 69(3), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gbadamosi, A. Q., Mahamadu, A. M., Manu, P., Akinade, O., Sierra, F., Lam, T. T., & Alzaatreh, A. (2018). A BIM based approach for optimization of construction and assembly through material selection. In M. Skibniewski & M. Hajdu (Eds.), Creative construction conference 2018 (CCC 2018). Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Gerth, R., Boqvist, A., Bjelkemyr, M., & Lindberg, B. (2013). Design for construction: Utilizing production experiences in development. Construction Management and Economics, 31(2), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, A. G. (2001). Standardization and pre-assembly-distinguishing myth from reality using case study research. Construction Management and Economics, 19(3), 307–315.
   Google Scholar
• The Government of Hong Kong SAR Development Bureau. (2018). Construction 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.hkc2.hk/booklet/Construction-2-0-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harik, R. F., & Sahmrani, N. (2010). DFMA+, a quantitative DFMA methodology. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 7(5), 701–709.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q. (2012). Introduction. In C. M. Eastman (Ed.), Design for X: Concurrent engineering imperatives (pp. 1–18). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, R. (1995). Buildability as a design concept for architects: A case study of laboratory buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2(1), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Infrastructure and Projects Authority. (2018). National infrastructure and construction pipeline. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QoJxYn
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., Olofsson, T., Sandberg, M., & Malmgren, L. (2008). Reducing complexity of customized prefabricated buildings through modularization and IT support. In International conference on information technology in construction: 15/07/2008-17/07/2008 (pp. 429–437). Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Talca.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, C. C., Green, S. D., & Larsen, G. D. (2009). Emergent discourses of construction competitiveness: Localized learning and embeddedness. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), 1005–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Male, S. (2003). Value management in design and construction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., Male, S., Graham, D., Male, S., & Graham, D. (2004). Value management of construction projects (pp. 9–19). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., McGovern, S., Belsky, M., Middleton, C., & Brilakis, I. (2016). A suitability analysis of precast components for standardized bridge construction in the United Kingdom. Procedia Engineering, 164, 188–195.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction (Vol. 72). Stanford: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., Howell, G., Ballard, G., & Tommelein, I. (2002). The foundations of lean construction. Design and Construction: Building in Value, 291, 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. C., Huang, S. H., & Zhang, H. C. (2001). Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: Concepts, applications, and perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41(3), 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, P. T., & Wong, F. W. (2009). Improving building project performance: How buildability benchmarking can help. Construction Management and Economics, 27(1), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, P. T., & Wong, F. W. (2011). A comparative study of buildability perspectives between clients, consultants and contractors. Construction Innovation, 11(3), 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., & Beatty, K. E. (2012). Representative literature reviews using constrained snowball sampling and citation network analysis. Retrieved from SSRN 1992601
   Google Scholar
• Lu, W., Chen, K., Xue, F., & Pan, W. (2018). Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: An analytical framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, M., Underwood, J., & Fleming, A. (2016). Implementing BIM to streamline a design, manufacture, and fitting workflow: A case study on a fit-out SME in the UK. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling, 5(3), 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S., Kelly, J., Gronqvist, M., & Graham, D. (2007). Managing value as a management style for projects. International Journal of Project Management, 25(2), 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, C., Shen, Q., Shen, L., & Tang, L. (2013). Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between offsite prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Buildings, 66, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, B. H. (1991). Performance measurement for world class manufacturing: A model for American companies. CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Mbamali, I., Aiyetan, O. A., & Kehinde, J. O. (2005). Building design for buildability: An investigation of the current practice in Nigeria. Building and Environment, 40(9), 1267–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montali, J., Overend, M., Pelken, P. M., & Sauchelli, M. (2018). Knowledge-based engineering in the design for manufacture of prefabricated façades: Current gaps and future trends. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(1-2), 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montali, J., Sauchelli, M., Jin, Q., & Overend, M. (2019). Knowledge-rich optimisation of prefabricated façades to support conceptual design. Automation in Construction, 97, 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. (1996). Buildability assessment and the development of an automated design aid for managing the transfer of construction process knowledge. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 3(1/2), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, C., Backhouse, S., Aibinu, A., Cleveland, B., Crawford, R., Holzer, D., … Kvan, T. (2018). Plug n play: Future prefab for smart green schools. Buildings, 8(7), 88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OGC. (2000). Achieving sustainability in construction procurement, produced by the sustainability action group of the government construction clients’ panel (GCCP). Retrieved from www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Sustainability_in_Construction_Procurement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ogunbiyi, O., Goulding, J. S., & Oladapo, A. (2014). An empirical study of the impact of lean construction techniques on sustainable construction in the UK. Construction Innovation, 14(1), 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Omigbodun, A. (2001). Value engineering and optimal building projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 7(2), 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Orlowski, K., Shanaka, K., & Mendis, P. (2018). Design and development of weatherproof seals for prefabricated construction: A methodological approach. Buildings, 8(9), 117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, L. (2013). The future of DfMA is the future of construction. Engineering Excellence Journal, 2013, 77.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. W. (2003). The social and economic value of construction: The construction industry’s contribution to sustainable development, 2003. London: Construction Industry Research and Innovation Strategy Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Peterseim, J. H., White, S., & Hellwig, U. (2016). Novel solar tower structure to lower plant cost and construction risk. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1734(1), 070025.
   Google Scholar
• Pottmann, H. (2009). Geometry and new and future spatial patterns. Architectural Design, 79(6), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pottmann, H. (2010). Architectural geometry as design knowledge. Architectural Design, 80(4), 72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pottmann, H. (2013). Architectural geometry and fabrication-aware design. Nexus Network Journal, 15(2), 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaji, I. J., Memari, A. M., & Messner, J. I. (2017). Product-oriented information delivery framework for multistory modular building projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(4), 04017001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, C., Nahangi, M., Perreault, M., & Haas, C. T. (2016). Optimum assembly planning for modular construction components. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(1), 04016039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlinson, J. G. (2017). Creative thinking and brainstorming. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects. (2013). RIBA plan of work 2013. London, UK: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q., & Liu, G. (2004). Applications of value management in the construction industry in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(1), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, K. G., & Brown, N. J. (2013). Implementation strategies for design for manufacture methodologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(6), 827–833.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, V. W., Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., & Ng, W. C. (2007). Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3642–3654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C. B., Vanegas, J. A., & Williams, J. M. (1987). Constructability improvement using prefabrication, preassembly, and modularization. Austin, TX, USA: Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Tepavčević, B., Stojaković, V., Mitov, D., Bajšanski, I., & Jovanović, M. (2017). Design to fabrication method of thin shell structures based on a friction-fit connection system. Automation in Construction, 84, 207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I. D. (1998). Pull-driven scheduling for pipe-spool installation: Simulation of lean construction technique. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), 279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trygg, L. (1993). Concurrent engineering practices in selected Swedish companies: A movement or an activity of the few? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(5), 403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. D., Lu, W., Sönderland, J., & Chen, K. (2018). The interplay between formal and informal institutions in projects: A social network analysis. Project Management Journal, 49(4), 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, F. W., & Lam, P. T. (2008). Benchmarking of buildability and construction performance in Singapore: Is there a case for Hong Kong? International Journal of Construction Management, 8(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., Sun, C., & Wang, Y. (2018). Design for manufacture and assembly-oriented parametric design of prefabricated buildings. Automation in Construction, 88, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, R., Peng, Y., Xue, F., Fang, J., Zou, W., Luo, H., … Huang, G. Q. (2017). Prefabricated construction enabled by the internet-of-things. Automation in Construction, 76(4), 59–70.
   Google Scholar