Material saving and building component efficiency as main eco-design principles for membrane architecture: case - studies of ETFE enclosures

References

• Ahlquist, S. (2016). Sensory material architectures: Concepts and methodologies for spatial tectonics and tactile responsivity in knitted textile hybrid structures. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(1), 63–82. doi: 10.1177/1478077115625525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, J., Pezeshkzadeh, S. A., & Afrin, S. (2013). Embodied energy in ETFE foil construction. In H. Bogner-Balz, M. Mollaert, & E. Pusat (Eds.), [RE]THINKING lightweight structures (pp. 457–466). Istanbul, Turkey: Tensinet Syposium Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• COST Action TU1303. (2017). Novel structural skins - improving sustainability and efficiency through new structural textile materials and designs. Retrieved from http://www.novelstructuralskins.eu, 2013–2017
   Google Scholar
• Cremers, J. (2014). Environmental impact of membrane and foil materials and structures – status quo and future outlook. In: Technical Transactions Architecture, 7-a, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, B., & Mollaert, M. (2004). The European design Guide for tensile surface structures. Brussels: Tensinet Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Knippers, J., & Speck, T. (2012). Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 7(1), doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/015002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges, A., & Knippers, J. (2015). Fibrous Tectonics. in Architectural Design, Sept. doi: 10.1002/ad.1952
   Google Scholar
• Mollaert, M., Dimova, S., Pinto, A., & Denton, S. (Eds). (2016). Prospect for European guidance for the structural design of tensile membrane structures. Support to the implementation, harmonization and further development of the Eurocodes. JRC Science Hub, European Union. doi:10.2788/967746.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C. (2010). Environmental assessment of ultralight roof structures built with new materials: the case of the ETFE cushions. In Vegh L. (eds.) Environmentally compatible structures and structural materials (ECS), Czech Technical University, Praga, 24-25/09/2009, pp. 28–37, ISBN/ISSN: 9788001045060.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C., Campioli, A., & Zanelli, A. (2009a). Environmental profile of lightweight roof structures built with new materials: The case of the ETFE pillows. Structural Membranes 2009 - III International Conference on Textile Composites and Inflatable Structures, Stuttgart, 5/10/2009 - 7/10/2009, 2009, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C., Campioli, A., & Zanelli, A. (2009b). Environmental load of ETFE cushions and future ways for their self-sufficient performances. In: Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures. Symposium Proceedings of International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Valencia, 28/9/2009 - 2/10/2009, 2009, pp. 200–213.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C., Campioli, A., & Zanelli, A. (2013). Life cycle assessment of textile façades, beyond the current cladding systems. In Bogner-Balz, H., Mollaert, M. and Pusat E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the TENSINET Symposium 2013 [RE]THINKING Lightweight Structures, 8–10 May 2013, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 467–476.
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C., & Zanelli, A. (2016). Life cycle design and efficiency principles for membrane architecture: Towards a new set of eco-design strategies. Procedia Engineering, 155, 416–425. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.045
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, C., Zanelli, A., & Centrulli, M. (2017). Application and validation of eco-efficiency principles to assess the design of lightweight structures: case studies of ETFE building skins. in: Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2017 “Interfaces: architecture. engineering. science”, International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), 25–28 Sept, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, R., Costa, A. A., Silvestre, D., & Pyl, L. (2019). Integration of LCA and LCC analysis within a BIM-based environment. Automation in Construction, 103, 127–149. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobek, W. (2016). Ultra-lightweight construction. International Journal of Space Structures, 31(1), 74–80. doi:10.1177/0266351116643246.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, D. V. Y., & Le, K. N. (2019). Sustainable construction technologies: Life-cycle assessment. Cambridge, Massechusset, USA: Butterworth – Heinemann, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar