Performative design processes in architectural practices in Turkey: architects’ perception

References

• Arayici, Y., Fernando, T., Munoz, V., & Bassanino, M. (2018). Interoperability specification development for integrated BIM use in performance based design. Automation in Construction, 85, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataman, C., & Dino, I. G. (2019). Collective residential spaces in sustainability development: Turkish housing units within Co-living understanding. IOP Conference series: Earth and environmental science.
   Google Scholar
• Attia, S., Gratia, E., De Herde, A., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2012). Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design. Energy and Buildings, 49, 2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, R. (2008). Fundamentals of performance-based building design. Building Simulation, 1(4), 356–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research, 37(4), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgen, S., Keleş, S., Kaygusuz, A., Sari, A., & Kaygusuz, K. (2008). Global warming and renewable energy sources for sustainable development: A case study in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(2), 372–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., D’Alpaos, C., & Dell’Anna, F. (2019). Boosting Investments in Buildings Energy Retrofit: The Role of Incentives (pp. 593–600).
   Google Scholar
• Carpo, M. (2017). The second digital turn: Design beyond intelligence. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, D. B., Hand, J. W., Kummert, M., & Griffith, B. T. (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43(4), 661–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’O’, G., Sarto, L., Sanna, N., & Martucci, A. (2012). Comparison between predicted and actual energy performance for summer cooling in high-performance residential buildings in the lombardy region (Italy). Energy and Buildings, 54, 234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. A., & Songer, A. D. (2002). Technological change in the AEC industry: A social architecture factor model of individuals’ resistance. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 1, 286–291.
   Google Scholar
• den Otter, A. F., & Prins, M. (2002). Architectural design management within the digital design team. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 9(3), 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Dino, I. G., & Stouffs, R. (2014). Evaluation of reference modeling for building performance assessment. Automation in Construction, 40, 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmuş Arsan, Z. (2003). A critical view of sustainable architecture in Turkey: A proposal for the municipality of Seyrek. Unpublishes Doctoral Dissertation. İzmir: Izmir Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, D., Rempling, R., & Plos, M. (2019). Integrated project team performance in early design stages – performance indicators influencing effectiveness in bridge design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 15(4), 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• European Comission. (2020). Unleashing the full potential of European SMEs.
   Google Scholar
• Evin, D., & Ucar, A. (2019). Energy impact and eco-efficiency of the envelope insulation in residential buildings in Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering, 154(December 2018), 573–584.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gürsel Dino, I., & Akgül, C. M. (2019). Impact of climate change on the existing residential building stock in Turkey: An analysis on energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and occupant comfort. Renewable Energy, 141, 828–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Farmer, G. (2001). Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3), 140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi, S. (2017). The promise of BIM for improving building performance. Energy and Buildings, 153, 525–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedani, A. Z., & Huber, F. (2012). A comparative study of DGNB, LEED and BREEAM certificate systems in Urban Sustainability. The Sustainable City VII, 155, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hensel, M. (2013). Performance-oriented architecture: Rethinking architectural design and the built environment. Chichester: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J., Macve, R., & Struyven, G. (2007). Qualitative research: Experiences in using semi-structured interviews. In Christopher Humphrey & Bill Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Horvat, M., & Fazio, P. (2005). Comparative review of existing certification programs and performance assessment tools for residential buildings. Architectural Science Review, 48, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasiński, A. (2020). Impact of BIM implementation on architectural practice. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalfa, S. M. (2018). Building information modeling (BIM) systems and their applications in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, 1(1), 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kanters, J., Dubois, M. C., & Wall, M. (2013). Architects design process in solar-integrated architecture in Sweden. Architectural Science Review, 56(2), 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanters, J., Horvat, M., & Dubois, M. C. (2014). Tools and methods used by architects for solar design. Energy and Buildings, 68(PART C), 721–731.
   Google Scholar
• Karadag, H. (2015). The role and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprises (smes) in Emerging economies: An analysis from Turkey. Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kazanasmaz, T., Uygun, I. E., Akkurt, G. G., Turhan, C., & Ekmen, K. E. (2014). On the relation between architectural considerations and heating energy performance of Turkish residential buildings in izmir. Energy and Buildings, 72, 38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolarevic, B. (2004). Back to the future: Performative architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2(1), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Landgren, M., & Jensen, L. B. (2018). How does sustainability certification affect the design process? Mapping final design projects at an architectural office. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 14(4), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Zhao, F., & Augenbroe, G. (2013). The use of normative energy calculation beyond building performance rating. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 6(4), 282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leistner, S., Honold, C., Maierhofer, M., Haase, W., Blandini, L., Sobek, W., … Menges, A. (2020). Research on integral design and planning processes for adaptive buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor, B., Othman, I., & Pomares, J. C. (2021). Digital technologies in the architecture, engineering and construction (Aec) industry—a bibliometric—qualitative literature review of research activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6135. doi:10.3390/ijerph18116135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. The Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, M. F., Esmanioto, F., Huber, N., Loures, E. R., & Canciglieri, O. (2019). A systematic literature review of interoperability in the Green building information modeling lifecycle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2020). Key drivers for smart and sustainable practices in the built environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(6), 1257–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opoku, D. G. J., Ayarkwa, J., & Agyekum, K. (2019). Barriers to environmental sustainability of construction projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(4), 292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2007). A performance-based model in digital design: PER-FORMATIVE—Design Beyond aesthetic. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(3), 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, F. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in adopting early contractor involvement (ECI): client’s perception. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1–2), 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sahay, S., Palit, M., & Robey, D. (1994). A relativist approach to studying the social construction of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(4), 248–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari, R., Ewing, B. T., & Aydin, B. (2007). Macroeconomic variables and the housing market in Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 43(5), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayın, S., & Çelebi, G. (2020). A practical approach to performance-based building design in architectural project. Building Research and Information, 48(4), 446–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyis, S., Ergen, E., & Pizzi, E. (2016). Identification of waste types and their root causes in Green-building project delivery process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2), 04015059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2021). Parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices: Towards an adapted design process model. Design Studies, 72, 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. (2019). Embedding building performance evaluation in UK architectural practice and beyond. Building Research and Information, 47(3), 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storvang, P., & Clarke, A. H. (2014). How to create a space for stakeholders’ involvement in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 32(12), 1166–1182.
   Google Scholar
• Tekler, Z. D., Low, R., Choo, K. T. W., & Blessing, L. (2021). User perceptions and adoption of plug load Management systems in the workplace. Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on human factors in Computing systems, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tekler, Z. D., Low, R., Gunay, B., Andersen, R. K., & Blessing, L. (2020). A scalable bluetooth Low energy approach to identify occupancy patterns and profiles in office spaces. Building and Environment, 171, 106681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a tool for informant selection. A Journal of Plant, People and Applied Research: Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Tronchin, L., & Fabbri, K. (2008). Energy performance building evaluation in Mediterranean countries: Comparison between software simulations and operating rating simulation. Energy and Buildings, 40(7), 1176–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. (2019a). Statistics of small and medium-sized enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. (2019b). Urbanization Rates by Years.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. First release. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel, I. (2010). Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 35(7), 1469–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar