Digital-enabled Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) in offsite construction: A modularity perspective for the product and process integration

References

• Abanda, F., Tah, J., & Cheung, F. (2017). Bim in off-site manufacturing for buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 14, 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwisy, A., Al-Hussein, M., & Al-Jibouri, S. (2012). Bim approach for automated drafting and design for modular construction manufacturing. Computing in Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Arashpour, M. 2019. Design for manufacture and assembly in offsite construction and relationship with concurrent engineering. In: Jack S. Goulding, F. P. R. (ed.) Offsite production manufacturing for innovative construction: People, process technology.
   Google Scholar
• Arif, M., Goulding, J., & Rahimian, F. P. (2012). Promoting off-site construction: Future challenges and opportunities. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18, 75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. (1995). Cutting costs and time with DFMA. Mechanical Engineering, 117, 74–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azhar, S., Ahmad, I., & Sein, M. K. (2010). Action research as a proactive research method for construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2006). Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems. Complex engineered systems. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Henkel, J. (2015). Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1637–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Zhikang, Laovisutthichai, Vikrom, Tan, Tan, Wang, Qiong, & Lu, Weisheng. (2022). Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) enablers for offsite interior design and construction. Building Research & Information, 50(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.1966734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, N., Fuchs, S., Mischke, J., Palter, R., Strube, G., & Woetzel, J. (2019). Modular construction: From projects to products. McKinsey & Company: Capital Projects & Infrastructure, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, T. (2015). The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Automation in Construction, 59, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, D., & Camuffo, A. (2010). The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carra, G., Argiolas, A., Bellissima, A., Niccolini, M., & Ragaglia, M. (2018). Robotics in the construction industry: state of the art and future opportunities. ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 2018. IAARC Publications, 1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, K., Peltokorpi, A., Lavikka, R., & Seppänen, O. (2022). The monetary and Non-monetary impacts of prefabrication on construction: The effects of product modularity. Buildings, 12, 459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Bridging BIM and building: From a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 1405–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2016). The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 709–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rocha, C. G., & El Ghoz, H. B. (2019). A model for implementing product modularity in buildings design. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rocha, C. G., & Koskela, L. (2020). Why is product modularity underdeveloped in construction? Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 2020. International Group for Lean Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, D., & Giannakis, M. (2011). An examination of a modular supply chain: A construction sector perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, H., Sandberg, M., Jansson, G., & Lessing, J. (2021). Exploring product modularity in residential building areas. Buildings, 11, 281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitzinger, E., & Lee, H. L. (1997). Mass customization at hewlett-packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Business Review, 75, 116–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, C. H., Golany, B., & Naseraldin, H. (2005). Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2021). Make megaprojects more modular. Harvard Business Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative content analysis. Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Forza, C., Salvador, F., & Trentin, A. (2008). Form postponement effects on operational performance: A typological theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, X., Chang, R., & Wen, T. (2018). Overcoming barriers to off-site construction through engaging stakeholders: A two-mode social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 735–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., Jin, R., & Lu, W. (2020). Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: A review. Building Research & Information, 48, 538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering Design, 14, 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Allamneni, S. (1999). Modular product design: A life-cycle view. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 3, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gharbia, M., Chang-Richards, A., Lu, Y., Zhong, R. Y., & Li, H. (2020). Robotic technologies for on-site building construction: A systematic review. Journal of Building Engineering, 101584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, Nuno, & Tether, Bruce S. (2011). Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity. Research Policy, 40(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodier, C., & Gibb, A. (2007). Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 25, 585–595.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, I. (1994). Object oriented methods. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. M., Whyte, J. K., & Lessing, J. (2020). Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in silicon valley construction firms: A comparative case study. Construction Management and Economics, 38, 322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. H. (1979). The dynamics of process-product life cycle. Harvard Business Review, 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innella, F., Arashpour, M., & Bai, Y. (2019). Lean methodologies and techniques for modular construction: Chronological and critical review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145, 04019076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, K. (1998). Modularity: A key concept in product life-cycle engineering. Handbook of Life-Cycle Engineering, 511–530.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Calantone, R. (2011). Product and process modularity's effects on manufacturing agility and firm growth performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, R., Mao, C., Hou, L., Wu, C., & Tan, J. (2018). A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., Chi, H.-L., Wang, X., & Ding, L. (2015). Automation and robotics in construction and civil engineering. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79, 347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T.-C., Huang, S. H., & Zhang, H.-C. (2001). Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: Concepts, applications, and perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41, 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusiak, A. (2002). Integrated product and process design: A modularity perspective. Journal of Engineering Design, 13, 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langston, C., & Zhang, W. (2021). Dfma: Towards an integrated strategy for a more productive and Sustainable Construction industry in Australia. Sustainability, 13, 9219.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M., Ogden, R., & Goodier, C. I. (2014). Design in modular construction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, W., Tan, T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S., & Xue, F. (2021). Applying The DQI-based kano model and QFD to develop design strategies for visitor centers in national parks. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2007). The impact of component modularity on design evolution: Evidence from the software industry. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, C., Shen, Q., Pan, W., & Ye, K. (2015). Major barriers to off-site construction: The developer’s perspective in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31, 04014043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omigbodun, A. (2001). Value engineering and optimal building projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 7, 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W., & Sidwell, R. (2011). Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 29, 1081–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Parnas, D. L. (1972). On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Pioneers and their contributions to software engineering. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parraguez, P., Piccolo, S. A., Perišić, M. M., Štorga, M., & Maier, A. M. (2019). Process modularity over time: Modeling process execution as an evolving activity network. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 1867–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Hao, Q., Mak, H., Neelamkavil, J., Xie, H., Dickinson, J., … Xue, H. (2010). Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: A review. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24, 196–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., & Rebolledo, P. (2018). A handbook for exploratory action research. British Council London.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, E. T., & Aragón, A. O. (2020). Action research. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, T., Lu, W., Tan, G., Xue, F., Chen, K., Xu, J., … Gao, S. (2020). Construction-Oriented design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering Management.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, T., Mills, G., Hu, J., & Papadonikolaki, E. (2021). Integrated approaches to Design for Manufacture and Assembly: A case study of huoshenshan hospital to combat COVID-19 in wuhan, China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37, 05021007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2004). Measuring modularity-based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: A customer-driven perspective. Decision Sciences, 35, 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24, 419–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Viana, D. D., Tommelein, I. D., & Formoso, C. T. (2017). Using modularity to reduce complexity of industrialized building systems for mass customization. Energies, 10, 1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voordijk, H., Meijboom, B., & De Haan, J. (2006). Modularity in supply chains: A multiple case study in the construction industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, C. A., & Hsuan, J. (2009). Service architecture and modularity. Decision Sciences, 40, 541–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, H. J., Alvarez, M., Kyjanek, O., Bhiri, Z., Buck, M., & Menges, A. (2020). Flexible and transportable robotic timber construction platform – TIM. Automation in Construction, 120, 103400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., Sun, C., & Wang, Y. (2018). Design for manufacture and assembly-oriented parametric design of prefabricated buildings. Automation in Construction, 88, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar