Evaluation of learning methods in architecture design studio via analytic hierarchy process: a case study

References

• Abdullah, N. A. G., Beh, S. C., Tahir, M. M., Ani, A. I. C., & Tawil, N. M. (2011). Architecture design studio culture and learning spaces: A holistic approach to the design and planning of learning facilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.044
   Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh, O., Zidan Saad, J., Yehia, S., & Randolph, D. (2007). Hybrid prequalification-based, innovative contracting model using AHP. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(2), 88–96. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(88)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguarón, J., Escobar, M. T., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2021). Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 576–583. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akalin, A., & Sezal, I. (2009). The importance of conceptual and concrete modelling in architectural design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(1), 14–24. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, K. H. (1987). Private reactions to public criticism; students, faculty, and practicing architects state their views on design juries in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 40(3), 2–11. doi:10.1080/10464883.1987.10758454
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Ataman, C., & Dino, İG. (2022). Performative design processes in architectural practices in Turkey: Architects’ perception. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), 690–704. doi:10.1080/17452007.2021.1995315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attoe, W., & Mugerauer, R. (1991). Excellent studio teaching in architecture. Studies in Higher Education, 16(1), 41–50. doi:10.1080/03075079112331383081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayalp, G., & Çivici, T. (2021). Critical stress factors influencing architecture students in Turkey: A structural equation modelling approach. Open House International, 46(2), 281–303. doi:10.1108/OHI-10-2020-0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2008). A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1422–1428. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/b97668.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, M., Pennypacker, E., & Yahner, T. (2006). Enhancing critical thinking through “independent design decision making” in the studio. Open House International, 31(3), 33–42. doi:10.1108/OHI-03-2006-B0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudhraa, S., Dorta, T., Milovanovic, J., & Pierini, D. (2021). Co-ideation critique unfolded: An exploratory study of a co-design studio ‘crit’ based on the students’ experience. CoDesign, 17(2), 119–138. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1572765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozorg-Haddad, O., Zolghadr-Asli, B., & Loaiciga, H. A. (2021). A handbook on multi-attribute decision-making methods. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2006). For-getting drawing: Toward an architectural pedagogy for digital media. In J. Al-Qawasmi (Ed.), Changing trends in architectural design education (pp. 59–79). Rabat: The Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region (CSAAR).
   Google Scholar
• Çakmakli, A. B., Gursel Dino, I., Komez Daglioglu, E., Pinar, E., & Yoncacı Arslan, P. (2022). The diagonal axis from VERB to VOID: interdisciplinarity in basic design studio education. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, (ahead-of-print). doi:10.1108/ARCH-12-2021-0337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cikis, S., & Ek, F. I. (2010). Conceptualization by visual and verbal representations: An experience in an architectural design studio. The Design Journal, 13(3), 329–354. doi:10.2752/146069210X12766130824975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossentino, J. (2002). Importing artistry: Further lessons from the design studio. Reflective Practice, 3(1), 39–52. doi:10.1080/14623940220129861
   Google Scholar
• Crysler, C. G. (1995). Critical pedagogy and architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(4), 208–217. doi:10.1080/10464883.1995.10734644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Critiquing critiques: A genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(2), 135–159. doi:10.1177/1050651907311923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 436–452. doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbaş, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design Studies, 24(5), 437–456. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, C., Sara, R., & Parnell, R. (2007). The crit: An architecture student's handbook (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780080488592.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16–25. doi:10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
   Google Scholar
• El-Latif, M. A., Al-Hagla, K. S., & Hasan, A. (2020). Overview on the criticism process in architecture pedagogy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(2), 753–762. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshafei, G., Katunský, D., Zeleňáková, M., & Negm, A. (2022). Opportunities for using analytical hierarchy process in green building optimization. Energies, 15(12), 4490. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut, E., & Tarimcilar, M. (1991). On sensitivity analysis in the analytic hierarchy process. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 3(1), 61–83. doi:10.1093/imaman/3.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Fahim, A., Tan, Q., Naz, B., Ain, Q. U., & Bazai, S. U. (2021). Sustainable higher education reform quality assessment using SWOT analysis with integration of AHP and entropy models: A case study of Morocco. Sustainability, 13(8), 4312. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Antolin, M.-M., del Río, J. M., & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R.-A. (2022). Building performance simulation tools as part of architectural design: Breaking the gap through software simulation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 1227–1245. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09641-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A., & Montibeller, G. (2011). Problem structuring for multicriteria decision analysis interventions. In J. J. Cochran, L. A. Cox, P. Keskinocak, J. P. Kharoufeh, & J. C. Smith (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. doi:10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0683
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, M. P. (1993). Gender and racial bias in design juries. Journal of Architectural Education, 47(1), 38–48. doi:10.1080/10464883.1993.10734572
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, A. M., & Bowling, N. A. (2020). The effects of questionnaire length and behavioral consequences on careless responding. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(2), 410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: teacher–student communication. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(3), 285–302. doi:10.1017/S089006041000020X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2011). Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies, 32(2), 139–155. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M. (2013). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 12(2), 195–209. doi:10.1386/adch.12.2.195_1
   Google Scholar
• Haggag, A. G., Zaki, S. H., & Selim, A. M. (2023). Emergency camps design using analytical hierarchy process to promote the response plan for the natural disasters. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(3), 305–322. doi:10.1080/17452007.2022.2125359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harputlugil, T. (2018). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as an assessment approach for architectural design: Case study of architectural design studio. International Journal of Architecture & Planning, 6(2), 217–245. doi:10.15320/ICONARP.2018.53
   Google Scholar
• Iranmanesh, A., & Onur, Z. (2022). Generation gap, learning from the experience of compulsory remote architectural design studio. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–19. doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00345-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, L. (2015). A critical look at the digital technologies in architectural education: When, where, and how? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 526–530. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.506
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T. A., & Smith, D. (2002). The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force. New York: American Institute of Architecture Students.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilovas, E., & Vinogradova, I. (2016). Improved fuzzy AHP methodology for evaluating quality of distance learning courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1618–1624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, R. M. A., & Youssef, A. M. A. (2022). A computational framework for supporting architectural education of spaces’ furnishing design. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20(2), 346–377. doi:10.1177/14780771221097683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, D., & Hourigan, N. (2013). Critical dialogue in architecture studio: Peer interaction and feedback. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 8(1), 35–57. doi:10.11120/jebe.2013.00004
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. (2016). Scaffolding practices: A study of design practitioner engagement in design education. Design Studies, 45, 9–29. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, S. V. (2008). Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 167–188. doi:10.1007/s10798-006-9020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. S., & Muhuri, S. (2022). Grading of architectural heritage using AHP and TOPSIS methods: A case of odishan temple. India. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 444–477. doi:10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. D. (2001). The scientist, the social activist, the practitioner and the cleric: Pedagogical exploration towards a pedagogy of practice. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 18(1), 59–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M., Ivarsson, J., & Lymer, G. (2012). Embodied reasoning in architectural critique. Design Studies, 33(6), 530–556. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Pilling, S. (2005). Architectural education and the profession: Preparing for the future. In D. Nicol, & S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism (pp. 1–20). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Novi, F., & Piccardo, C. (2015). Technology as a key for design imagination, an Italian experience with beginner architecture students. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(3), 185–197. doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.895698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsner, J. K. (2000). Behind the mask: A psychoanalytic perspective on interaction in the design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 53(4), 194–206. doi:10.1162/104648800564608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Yi-Luen Do, E. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302–325. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Agyeman, Y., Larbi-Siaw, O., Brenya, B., & Anyidoho, A. (2017). An embedded fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2001). Chapter 12 - The mind in design: A conceptual framework for cognition in design education. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (pp. 269–295). Oxford: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50012-7.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2008). Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: Theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies, 29(2), 99–120. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, M. N., & Türkkan, E. E. (2006). The design studio as teaching/learning medium — A process-based approach. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(1), 96–104. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00472.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2020). Rethinking design studios as an integrative multi-layered collaboration environment. Journal of Urban Design, 25(4), 523–550. doi:10.1080/13574809.2020.1734449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, C. (2004). Critical absence versus critical engagement. Problematics of the crit in design learning and teaching. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(3), 143–154. doi:10.1386/adch.2.3.143/0
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, J., Jimeno, J. L., & Mokotoff, E. (2006). Another potential shortcoming of AHP. Top, 14(1), 99–111. doi:10.1007/BF02579004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. M. (1979). Me and My critics: Students’ responses to architectural jury criticism. Studies in Art Education, 20(2), 64–67. doi:10.1080/00393541.1979.11650234
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, H. (2020). Collaborative architectural design studio environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 303–324. doi:10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123–1132. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process?. In G. Mitra, H. J. Greenberg, F. A. Lootsma, M. J. Rijkaert, & H. J. Zimmermann (Eds.), Mathematical models for decision support (pp. 109–121). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990a). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. doi:10.1287/inte.24.6.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990b). Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting resource allocation (2nd ed.). Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2005). Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process (Vol. 282). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, M., & Yurdugül, H. (2018). A content analysis study on the use of analytic hierarchy process in educational studies. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 376–392. doi:10.21031/epod.373784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Wiley. https://books.google.com.cy/books?id=qplpAAAAMAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1988). Toward a marriage of artistry & applied science in the architectural design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(4), 4–10. doi:10.1080/10464883.1988.10758496
   Google Scholar
• Singer, H., & Özşahin, Ş. (2022). Prioritization of laminate flooring selection criteria from experts’ perspectives: A spherical fuzzy AHP-based model. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(6), 911–926. doi:10.1080/17452007.2021.1956421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2011). Understanding students’ views of the crit assessment. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 6(1), 44–67. doi:10.11120/jebe.2011.06010044
   Google Scholar
• Tahsiri, M. (2022a). A critique of the representationalist framing of design. The Design Journal, 25(4), 617–635. doi:10.1080/14606925.2022.2083293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahsiri, M. (2022b). Designing with the dialogic self: A framework for a polyphonic practice of architectural design. Architecture (washington, DC), 2(2), 362–382. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8945/2/2/20
   Google Scholar
• Tai, N.-C. (2022). Applications of augmented reality and virtual reality on computer-assisted teaching for analytical sketching of architectural scene and construction. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(3), 1664–1681. doi:10.1080/13467581.2022.2097241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R., & Abbasi, N. (2015). The architecture of teamwork: Examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 405–422. doi:10.1080/17452007.2014.927750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uluoǧlu, B. (2000). Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies, 21(1), 33–58. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00002-2
   Google Scholar
• Vehbi, B. O., Günçe, K., & Iranmanesh, A. (2021). Multi-Criteria assessment for defining compatible New Use: Old administrative hospital, kyrenia, Cyprus. Sustainability, 13(4), 1–19. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles, H., Low, J., & Doron, H. R. (2012). Investigating architecture studio culture in the UK: A progress report. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 26–49. doi:10.11120/jebe.2012.07020026
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, W. V., & Rogers, J. S. (1995). The design life space: Verbal communication in the architectural design studio. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 12(4), 319–336. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43029175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R. (2007). Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: Why they often make no sense. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 948–961. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.016
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process—A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96–108. doi:10.1287/inte.16.4.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar