Facility management in gated settlements: challenges in Turkey-Istanbul experience

References

• Akalin, M. (2016). Mekânsal Ayrismanin Yeni Bir Bicimi Olarak Kapali/Kapili Siteler: Akkent Konutlari Örnegi (Closed/gated sites as a new form of spatial segregation: The case of Akkent Houses). Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(2), 923–956. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2001). A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning. Town Planning Review, 72, 45–76. doi:10.3828/tpr.2001.72.1.45
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S. (2012). Istanbul’da Orta Sinif Ve Kapali Siteler (Middle class and gated housing sites in Istanbul). Ideal Kent, 6, 96–123. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., & Calis, G. (2012). Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138, 431–442. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, J. (1995). Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Human Organization, 54(1), 42–51. doi:10.17730/humo.54.1.k84tv883mr2756l3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cai, R., & He, S. (2022). Governing homeowner associations in China’s gated communities: The extension of state infrastructural power and its uneven reach. Urban Geography, 43(4), 523–545. doi:10.1080/02723638.2021.1878429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, F. N., Chang, C. O., & Sing, T. F. (2012). Collective action dilemmas in condominium management. Urban Studies, 50(1), 128–147. doi:10.1177/0042098012452327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citizens Information. (2022, December 12). Management companies for apartment blocks. Retrieved March 20, 2023 from https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/housing/owning_a_home/home_owners/management_companies_for_apartment_blocks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, C., Losekoot, E., & Staal, A. (2016). Facilities management professional development: A New Zealand case study. Open Journal of International Education, 1(1), 45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ehwi, R. J. (2022). Modelling the supply-side factors influencing the provision of amenities in gated communities: The case of the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area in Ghana. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–31. doi:10.1080/07352166.2022.2124917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elyna Myeda, N., & Pitt, M. (2014). Facilities management in Malaysia: Understanding the development and practice. Facilities, 32(9/10), 490–508. doi:10.1108/F-02-2012-0012
   Google Scholar
• Erenturk, M., & Guven, O. (2018). Temel Kavram ve Uygulamalari ile Tesis Yonetimi. Istanbul: Beta Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Erenturk, M. K. (2016). Dis Kaynak Kullanimi ile Tesis Yonetiminin Konutlardaki Yasam Kalitesine Katkilari ve Bir Insaat Firmasi Uzerine Calisma (The contribution of outsourcing and facility management to the quality of life in residences and a study on a construction firm) Unpublished PhD Thesis, Halic University, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• FMA Australia. (August, 2012). Facilities management good practice guide. Melbourne: FMA Australia. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/good-practice-guide-facilities-management.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., & Lin, N. (2014). Civic territorial organizations in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 2309–2327. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L. W., & Ho, D. C. (2016). Explaining the outcomes of multi-owned housing management: A collective action perspective. Habitat International, 57, 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, W. (2015). Collective actions for the management of multi-owned residential building: A case of Hong Kong. Habitat International, 49, 316–324. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genis, S. (2007). Producing elite localities: The rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44(4), 771–798. doi:10.1080/00420980601185684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. R., La Roche, C. R., & Waller, B. D. (2020). Restrictions versus amenities: The differential impact of home owners associations on property marketability. Journal of Property Research, 37(3), 238–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). An institutional model of the development process. Journal of Property Research, 9(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/09599919208724049
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. (2012). Private sector-led urban development projects: Management, partnerships and effects in The Netherlands and the UK, A + BE Series, 4, Delft University of Technology, Delft (2012), pp. 1–480.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. D., & Liusman, E. (2016). Measuring the performance of property management companies in high-rise flats. Facilities, 34(3/4), 161–176. doi:10.1108/F-06-2014-0056
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., Poglitsch, R., & Ankerstjerne, P. (2014). Perspectives on the FM market development. ISS White Paper, www.publications.issworld.com/ISS/External/issworld/White_papers/Perspectives_on_The_FM_market_development/.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, E. C. M., & Zheng, X. (2010). Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector: A structural equation model approach. Facilities, 28(5/6), 306–320. doi:10.1108/02632771011031538
   Google Scholar
• International Facility Management Association (IFMA). (2006). Asset lifecycle model for total cost of ownership management: Framework, glossary and definitions, Retrieved 10 June, 2018 from http://www.ifma.org/docs/knowledge%20Base/asset%20lifecycle%20model.Pdf?%20Sfvrsn=2.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2018). ISO 41001:2018(en) facility management – Management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:41001:ed-1:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• Istanbul'da Markali Konut Projesi Sayisi Son Iki Yilda Yuzde 14 Artti (The Number of Branded Housing Projects in Istanbul Has Increased by 14 Percent in the Last Two Years). (2019, September 17). Haberturk Gazette. Retrieved 20 April, 2023 from: https://www.haberturk.com/istanbul-da-markali-konut-projesi-sayisi-son-iki-yilda-14-artti-2522966-ekonomi.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, O., Chidinma, N., & Chisom, N. (2021). Analytical study of facilities management practice in selected. IJESC (International Journal of Engineering, Science and Computing), 11(8), 28735–28743.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, E., Tanrivermis, Y., & Tanrivermis, H. (2021). Economic aspects of housing investments and the requirement of rational management strategies for mass housing facilities in Ankara Province of Turkey. European Real Estate Society Conference (ERES). Kaiserslautern, Germany. https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres 2021-173.
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, E., Tanrıvermiş, H., & Temeljotov Salaj, A. (2023). Development trends and current status of facility management and professionalization of facility services in Turkey. Facilities, 41(7(8), 510–525.
   Google Scholar
• Keyder, C. (2013). Arka Plan. In Ç. Keyder (Ed.), Küresel ile Yerel Arasında (Background: Between global and local) (pp. 9–40). İstanbul: Metis Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. (2014). Influence of personal attributes on perception of residential facilities management services. Facilities, 32(9), 509–521. doi:10.1108/F-05-2012-0036
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J. H., & Yik, F. W. (2011). An analytical method to evaluate facility management services for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 46, 165–175. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. Y. (2011). Outsourcing of housing services in Hong Kong: Optimization of transaction value. Journal of Facilities Management, 9(2), 114–126. doi:10.1108/14725961111128461
   Google Scholar
• Le, T. T. H., & Le, T. T. H. (2018). Privatization of neighborhood governance in transition economy: A case study of gated community in Phu My Hung new town, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. GeoJournal, 83, 783–801. doi:10.1007/s10708-017-9803-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Goix, R., & Webster, C. (2008). Gated communities. Geography Compass, 2(4), 1189–1214. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00118.x
   Google Scholar
• Linariza, H., & Ashok, V. (2003). Facility management: An introduction. The Professional Journal of the Malaysian Surveyor, 38(1), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, F. K. (1991). A guide to effective property management in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (2003). Common-interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate, 14(1&2), 203–234. doi:10.1080/10511482.2003.9521473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E. (2016). Rethinking private residential government in the US: Recent trends, practices and policy. In A. Lehavi (Ed.), Private communities and urban governence: Theoratical and comparative perspectives (pp. 51–76). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mese, S. (2019). Kapalı siteler ve mahalle kültürünün dönüşümü: Beyaz Rezidans ve Nişancı Mahallesi karşılaştırması (Gated settlements and the transformation of neighborhood culture: The comparison between Beyaz Residence and Nişancı neighborhood) Unpublished PhD Thesis, İbni Haldun University, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Nazali Mohd Noor, M., & Pitt, N. (2009). A critical review on innovation of facilities management service delivery. Facilities, 27(5/6), 211–228. doi:10.1108/02632770910944943
   Google Scholar
• Nazali Mohd Noor, N., & Pitt, M. (2010). Defining facilities management (Fm) In the Malaysian perspective. European Real Estate Society (ERES) Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Olanrele, O. O., Ahmed, A., & Smith, H. O. (2014). Facilities management service delivery in public and private high rise residential buildings in Nigeria: A case study of Eko court complex and Niger towers. MATEC Web of Conferences.
   Google Scholar
• Oshadiya, B. B. (1997). Effective management and supervision of maintenance, repairs and improvement works. IJESC, August 2021 28743 http://ijesc.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Serin, B., Smith, H., & McWilliams, C. (2020). The role of the state in the commodification of urban space: The case of branded housing projects, Istanbul. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(4), 342–358. doi:10.1177/0969776420920921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Ling, G. H. T. (2022). Exploring the mediational effects of institutional-social-ecological factors on collective action performance. Applying SES Theory in Gated Communities. Housing, Theory and Society, 40(3), 282–334.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Ling, G. H. T. (2023). Factors influencing collective action of gated communities: A systematic review using an SES framework. Open House International, 48(2), 325–355. doi:10.1108/OHI-01-2022-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., Ling, G. H. T., & Wang, H. K. (2022). Sustainable collective action in high-rise gated communities: Evidence from Shanxi, China using ostrom’s design principles. Sustainability, 14(21), 14432. doi:10.3390/su142114432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, N. D. (2011). Promoting the facilities management profession in the project development phase of high-rise buildings in Sri Lanka. Built-environment Sri Lanka, 9, 37. doi:10.4038/besl.v9i1-2.3063
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M., Temeljotov-Salaj, A., & Tangeras, M. (2018). The maturity of facility management in southeast Europe. Research Papers for EuroFM’s 17th Research Symposium at EFMC 2018, The 17th EuroFM Research Symposium, 05 June 2018-08 June 2018, Sofia, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Turkun, A., & Kurtulus, H. (2015). Giris. In H. Kurtuluş (Ed.), İstanbul’da kentsel ayrışma: mekânsal dönüşümde farklı boyutlar (Urban segregation in Istanbul: Different dimensions in spatial transformation) (pp. 9–23). Istanbul: Baglam Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Yin, H., & Zhou, Z. (2011). The adoption of bottom-up governance in China’s homeowner associations. Management and Organization Review, 8(3), 559–583. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2331867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Chang, Y. C., Zhang, C., Qin, H., & Jiang, D. (2014). Comparison of housing facility management between mainland China and Taiwan region. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(4), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu, C. Y., Lo, S. M., Ng, S. T., & Ng, M. M. F. (2002). Contractor selection for small building works in Hong Kong. Structural Survey, 20(4), 129–135. doi:10.1108/02630800210445690
   Google Scholar
• Yiu, C. Y., Wong, S. K., & Yau, Y. (2006). Property management as property rights governance: Exclusion and internal conflict resolution. Property Management, 24(2), 87–97. doi:10.1108/02637470610657989
   Google Scholar
• Zalejska-Jonsson, A. (2020). Does facility management affect perception of building quality? A study of cooperative residential buildings in Sweden. Facilities, 38(7/8), 559–576. doi:10.1108/F-02-2019-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar