Spatial logic of scientific research: an exploratory and quantitative analysis of 42 scientific research buildings sited in America and Europe

References

• Aitchison, M. (2016). The architecture of industry: Changing paradigms in industrial building and planning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. (2004). Working without walls: An insight into the transforming government workplace. London: DEGW.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T., & Henn, G. (2007). The organization and architecture of innovation. Burlington, MA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Danivska, V. (2021). A handbook of theories on designing alignment between people and the office environment. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, A., & Drew, P. (1992). The design implications of social interaction in a workplace setting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19(5), 573–584.
   Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. L., & Mcelhinney, S. (2019). Isovists and the metrics of architectural space. In J. Ficca & A. Kulper (Eds.), Proceedings 107th ACSA annual meeting (pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., de Moya Anegón, F., & Mutz, R. (2014). Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models. Online Information Review, 38(1), 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2014). A fad or a phenomenon?: The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Research-Technology Management, 57(2), 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Q., Liu, Y., & Ji, M. (2021). Encounter with scientific research information on campus planning and design for university campuses that nurture interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation. Time + Architecture. doi:10.13717/j.cnki.ta.2021.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. (2005). Physics between War and peace. In W. Steven (Ed.), Instrumental in War (pp. 363–403). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P., Thompson, E. A., & Edelman, S. (1999). The architecture of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Penn, A. (1991). Visible colleges: Structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context, 4(1), 23–50. doi:10.1017/S0269889700000144
   Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2003). The architecture of complexity. Culture and Organization, 9(2), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., & Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, C., Higgins, W. F., Keeley, T. C., Allen, W. A., Worthington, H., Maddock, A. J., … Vansomeren, E. H. S. (1948). Discussion on the design of physics laboratories – London, 1947. Journal of Scientific Instruments, 25(5), 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (1992). The social potential of buildings: Spatial structure and the innovative millieu in scientific research laboratories. Proceedings of the corporate space and architecture conference, Paris, France: Ministère de l'équipement du logement et des transports.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Bajaj, R., Bromberg, J., Congdon, C., Rashid, M., … Zimring, C. (2007). Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 815–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinelo, J., & Turner, A. (2010). Introduction to UCL Depthmap 10. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, W. O. (1961). Prospectus for a laboratory. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Archives. Retrieved from https://aspace.archives.ucar.edu/repositories/2/archival_objects/207
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K. (2010). The space-organisation relationship. On the shape of the relationship between spatial configuration and collective organisational behaviours (PhD Thesis). Germany: TU Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K., & Penn, A. (2010). Towards an architectural theory of space and organisations: Cognitive, affective and conative relations in workplaces.
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K., Pomeroy, R., Raheem, A., Budgen, A., & Lonsdale, N. (2012). The generative office building. In Proceedings: Eighth international space syntax symposium, 8010. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, J. B., Santoro, M. D., & Farris, G. F. (2011). Creating collaboration opportunity: Designing the physical workplace to promote high-tech team communication. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szell, M., Ma, Y., & Sinatra, R. (2018). A nobel opportunity for interdisciplinarity. Nature Physics, 14(11), 1075–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Albats, E., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021). Interdisciplinary organization as a basic academic unit? Industry and Higher Education, 35(3), 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar