Comparison of fast daylighting climate-based simulation methods for parametric design: two-phase, three-phase method and path tracing

References

• Aish, R. (2011). Designscript: Origins, explanation, illustration. Computational Design Modelling, 1, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Masrani, S. M., Al-Obaidi, K. M., Zalin, N. A., Isma, A., & I, M. (2018). Design optimisation of solar shading systems for tropical office buildings: Challenges and future trends. Solar Energy, 170, 849–872. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub, M. (2020). A review on light transport algorithms and simulation tools to model daylighting inside buildings. Solar Energy, 198, 623–642. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., & Corne, D. W. (2002). Creative evolutionary systems. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Brembilla, E., Chi, D. A., Hopfe, C. J., & Mardaljevic, J. (2019). Evaluation of climate-based daylighting techniques for complex fenestration and shading systems. Energy and Buildings, 203, 109454. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. C., & Mueller, C. T. (2017). Automated performance-based design space simplification for parametric structural design. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, 2017(15), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• CIE STANDARD. (2006). COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE DE L’ECLAIRAGE. Technical Report. CIE 171:2006 “Test Cases to Assess the Accuracy of Lighting Computer Programs”.
   Google Scholar
• Compagnon, R. (1997). RADIANCE: a simulation tool for daylighting systems. Cambridge: The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies University of Cambridge Department of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, C. (2006). Assessing light in architecture: A numerical procedure for a qualitative and quantitative analysis. International Lighting Conference, Venise.
   Google Scholar
• Dili, A. S., Naseer, M. A., & Varghese, T. Z. (2010). Passive environment control system of Kerala vernacular residential architecture for a comfortable indoor environment: A qualitative and quantitative analyses. Energy and Buildings, 42(6), 917–927. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutré, P., Lafortune, E. P., & Willems, Y. D. (1993). Monte Carlo light tracing with direct computation of pixel intensities.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. W., & Mathews, E. H. (2001). A new simplified thermal design tool for architects. Building and Environment, 36(9), 1009–1021. doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eve Lin, S.-H., & Jason Gerber, D. (2014). Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early-stage design. Automation in Construction, 38, 59–73. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensen, J. L. M. (2004). Towards more effective use of building energy performance simulation in design Center for Buildings and Systems. Developments in Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, Kusuda 2001, 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Hviid, C. A., Nielsen, T. R., & Svendsen, S. (2008). Simple tool to evaluate the impact of daylight on building energy consumption. Solar Energy, 82(9), 787–798. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J. A., & Reinhart, C. F. (2011). DIVA 2.0: Integrating daylight and thermal simulations using Rhinoceros 3D, Daysim and EnergyPlus. Proceedings of Building Simulation, 20(11), 2202–2209.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., & Kennedy, S. (2017). Validated Interactive daylighting analysis for architectural design signature redacted signature redacted signature redacted.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., & Reinhart, C. F. (2016). Real-time visual comfort feedback for architectural design. PLEA 2016 Los Angeles–32nd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, 659–664.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. L., & Reinhart, C. F. (2017). Speedup potential of climate-based daylight modelling on GPUs. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1438–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Kajiya, J. T. (1986). The rendering equation. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, 143–150. doi:10.1145/15922.15902.
   Google Scholar
• Kalay, Y. E. (1999). Performance-based design. Automation in Construction, 8, 1233–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Kanters, J., Horvat, M., & Dubois, M.-C. (2014). Tools and methods used by architects for solar design. Energy and Buildings, 68, 721–731. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheiri, F. (2018). A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 897–920. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusuda, T. (1999). Early history and future prospects of building system simulation. IBPSA Conference Proceedings, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Lab, B. (2019). Window7.7.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D. H. W., Cheung, G. H. W., & Lau, C. C. S. (2006). A simplified procedure for determining indoor daylight illuminance using daylight coefficient concept. Building and Environment, 41(5), 578–589. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Liu, L., & Peng, C. (2020). A review of performance-oriented architectural design and optimization in the context of sustainability: Dividends and challenges. Sustainability, 12(4), 1427. doi:10.3390/su12041427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LM, I. (2013). Approved method: IES spatial Daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). New York: Illuminating Engineering Society.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, F. D. (2019). Learning performance-driven design. Students approach integrating urban form studies and building performance analysis. BUILDING SIMULATION 2019, Proceedings of the 16th IBPSA Conference, 2019(May), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel, A. A., Ford, B., & Lamberts, R. (2007). Main influences on the design philosophy and knowledge basis to bioclimatic integration into architectural design—The example of best practices. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3762–3773. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, A. (2013). The three-phase method for simulating complex fenestration with radiance. In LBNL.
   Google Scholar
• Negendahl, K., & Nielsen, T. R. (2015). Building energy optimization in the early design stages: A simplified method. Energy and Buildings, 105, 88–99. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A. T., Reiter, S., & Rigo, P. (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113, 1043–1058. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T. R. (2005). Simple tool to evaluate energy demand and indoor environment in the early stages of building design. Solar Energy, 78(1), 73–83. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2004.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C. E., Aries, M. B. C., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2012). State of the art in lighting simulation for building science: a literature review. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5(4), 209–233. doi:10.1080/19401493.2011.558211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergård, T., Jensen, R. L., & Maagaard, S. E. (2016). Building simulations supporting decision making in early design–A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61, 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. (2008). Performance-based design: current practices and research issues. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 6(1), 1–17. doi:10.1260/147807708784640090
   Google Scholar
• Papalambros, P. Y., & Wilde, D. J. (2000). Principles of optimal design: modeling and computation. In Principles of optimal design (pp. 11–23). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511626418
   Google Scholar
• Perez, R., Ineichen, P., Seals, R., Michalsky, J., & Stewart, R. (1990). Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy, 44(5), 271–289. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(90)90055-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picco, M., Lollini, R., & Marengo, M. (2014). Towards energy performance evaluation in early stage building design: A simplification methodology for commercial building models. Energy and Buildings, 76, 497–505. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehls, L. B. (2017). Energy assessment in early architectural design stages-framework and validation methodology for architect-friendly computation energy assessment. 257.
   Google Scholar
• Queiroz, N., Westphal, F. S., & Pereira, F. R. (2020). A performance-based design validation study on EnergyPlus for daylighting analysis. Building and Environment, 183, 107088. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. (2018). Daylighting Handbook II. London: SAGE Publications Sage UK.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. (2019). Daylight performance predictions. In J. L. M. Hensen & R. Lamberts (Eds.), Building performance simulation for design and operation (pp. 221–269). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C., & Breton, P.-F. (2009). Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and DAYSIM 3.0. Leukos, 6(1), 7–35. doi:10.1582/LEUKOS.2009.06.01001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., & Walkenhorst, O. (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33(7), 683–697. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudsari, M. S., Pak, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Conference Held in Lyon, France Aug, 3128–3135.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, D. (2013). Galapagos: On the logic and limitations of generic solvers. Architectural Design, 83(2), 132–135. doi:10.1002/ad.1568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, D., & McNeel, R. (2007). Grasshopper 3D. Seattle: Robert McNeel & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Yang, W. (2013). Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Automation in Construction, 32, 125–135. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solemma, L. L. C. (2020). ClimateStudio. Retrieved 16th October.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S. (2017). Daylighting simulations with radiance using matrix-based methods. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S. (2018). Parametric modeling strategies for efficient annual analysis of daylight in buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, S., & Mistrick, R. (2017). A more accurate approach for calculating illuminance with daylight coefficients. 2017 annual IES conference. Oregon, USA IES.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, G., Mistrick, R., Lee, E. S., McNeil, A., & Jonsson, J. (2011). Simulating the daylight performance of complex fenestration systems using bidirectional scattering distribution functions within radiance. Leukos, 7(4), 241–261. doi:10.1080/15502724.2011.10732150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G., & Shakespeare, R. (1998). Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization.
   Google Scholar
• Wetter, M. (2012). A view on future building system modeling and simulation. In Building performance simulation for design and operation (pp. 631–656). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., & de Angelis, E. (2019). Performance-based generative architecture design: A review on design problem formulation and software utilization. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, W., McNeil, A., Wetter, M., & Lee, E. S. (2014). Acceleration of the matrix multiplication of Radiance three phase daylighting simulations with parallel computing on heterogeneous hardware of personal computer. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7(2), 152–163. doi:10.1080/19401493.2013.795193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar