Synergizing BIM and RIBA in architectural practice – technology workflow efficiencies, challenges, and insights

References

• Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In Kathryn E. Newcomer, Harry P. Hatry, & Joseph S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 492–505). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Alazmeh, N., Underwood, J., & Coates, P. (2018). Implementing a BIM collaborative workflow in the UK construction market. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Alfieri, E., Seghezzi, E., Sauchelli, M., Di Giuda, G., & Masera, G. (2020). A BIM-based approach for DfMA in building construction: Framework and first results on an Italian case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(4), 247–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwan, Z., & Jones, B. I. (2022). IFC-based embodied carbon benchmarking for early design analysis. Automation in construction, 142, 104505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, K., & Abanda, F. H. (2019). Building information modelling plan of work for managing construction projects in Egypt. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(2), 23–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arayici, Y., Egbu, C., & Coates, S. (2012). Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: issues, challenges, and critiques. Journal of information technology in construction, 17, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 67(6), 436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azhar, S., Khalfan, M., & Maqsood, T. (2012). Building information modeling (BIM): Now and beyond. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(4), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Azizi, N. S. M., Tan, Z. Y., & Azizi, Z. (2021). Preliminary study of changes in work practices of quantity surveyors in building information modelling (BIM) projects. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(1), 140–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banxia Software. (2020). Decision explorer – Decision support and analysis tools manual. https://banxia.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bargstädt, H.-J. (2015). Challenges of BIM for construction site operations. Procedia Engineering, 117, 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., & Calis, G. (2012). Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber, B., & Kensek, K. (2010). Building information modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction: Emerging research directions and trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(3), 139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandín, R., & Abrishami, S. (2021). Information traceability platforms for asset data lifecycle: Blockchain-based technologies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(3), 364–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmeister, E., & Aitken, L. M. (2012). Sample size: How many is enough? Australian Critical Care, 25(4), 271–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, Y., Petri, I., & Rezgui, Y. (2023). Integrating BIM and Blockchain across construction lifecycle and supply chains. Computers in Industry, 148, 103886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charef, R. (2022). Supporting construction stakeholders with the circular economy: A trans-scaler framework to understand the holistic approach. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, 100454.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Luo, H. (2014). A BIM-based construction quality management model and its applications. Automation in construction, 46, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Tang, L. (2019). Development of BIM-based innovative workflow for architecture, engineering and construction projects in China. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 11(2), 119–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2019.V11.1133
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, T. (2017). BIM's’ Google Docs for buildings’ is transforming architecture–but could it kill creativity. WIRED Magazine. Retrieved, 10, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, P., Arayici, Y., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., & O'Reilly, K. (2010). The limitations of BIM in the architectural process.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. A., Jackson, V. A., Norwich, D., Schell, J. O., Schaefer, K., Ship, A. N., & Sullivan, A. M. (2016). A nephrology fellows’ communication skills course: An educational quality improvement report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 68(2), 203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., & Finn, R. (2005). 'Remember I’m the bloody architect!’ Architects, organizations and discourses of profession. Work, employment and society, 19(4), 775–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000). Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In OZCHI 2000 conference proceedings (Vol. 356, pp. 361–367). Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Czmoch, I., & Pękala, A. (2014). Traditional design versus BIM based design. Procedia Engineering, 91, 210–215.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K., McMeel, D. J., & Wilkinson, S. (2017). Making friends with Frankenstein: hybrid practice in BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(1), 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. (2002). Practical research methods: A user-friendly guide to mastering research. New Delhi: UBS Publishers Distributors.
   Google Scholar
• Dibley, L. (2011). Analysing narrative data using McCormack’s Lenses. Nurse researcher, 18(3), 13–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding, Z., Zuo, J., Wu, J., & Wang, J. (2015). Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: A China study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(6), 732–748. doi:10.1108/ECAM-04-2015-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C., & McNiff, S. (2013). BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in construction, 36, 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S. (2010). Design management in architecture, engineering and construction: origins and trends. Gestao & tecnologia de Projetos, 5(3), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M. (2016). The farmer review of the UK construction labour model. Construction Leadership Council. https://www.constructionleadershipcouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Farmer-Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. F., & Liu, A. M. (2021). Research methods for construction. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fogliato, R., Chappidi, S., Lungren, M., Fisher, P., Wilson, D., Fitzke, M., … Nushi, B. (2022). Who goes first? Influences of human-AI workflow on decision making in clinical imaging. In 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 1362–1374.
   Google Scholar
• Frimpong, S., & Dansoh, A. (2018). Marginalization and invasion of architects’ role on house projects: Institutional intervention inadequacy and super wicked problems. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(3), 292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamal, A., Nashaat, B., Shahda, M. M., & Nosier, S. R. (2024). Ten questions concerning the integration of digital fabrication techniques into the architectural design process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(1), 120–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganah, A., & John, G. A. (2015). An overview of the feasibility of achieving level 2 building information modeling by 2016 in the UK. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(8), 885–894.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, R. (2014). BIM design: Realising the creative potential of building information modelling. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., Hosseini, M. R., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N. (2014). Building information modelling (BIM) education in South Australia: Industry needs. In 5th International conference on engineering, project, and production management (EPPM 2014) (p. 293).
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, B., & McCool, D. (2015). BIM and construction management: Proven tools, methods, and workflows. Indiana: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, A. N., & Rasheed, S. M. (2019). The benefits of and challenges to implement 5D BIM in construction industry. Civil Engineering Journal, 5(2), 412.
   Google Scholar
• Hohpe, G., Ozkaya, I., Zdun, U., & Zimmermann, O. (2016). The software architect's role in the digital age. IEEE Software, 33(6), 30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, D. (2007). Are you talking to me? Why BIM alone is not the answer.
   Google Scholar
• Horvitz, E., Koch, P., & Apacible, J. (2004). BusyBody: Creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 507–510).
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J., Nelson, A., Vough, H., & Zilber, T. B. (2021). From the editors—Achieving fit and avoiding misfit in qualitative research (Vol. 64, pp. 1313–1323). Manor, NY: Academy of Management Briarcliff.
   Google Scholar
• Javidannia, G., Bemanian, M., Mahdavinejad, M., Nejat, S., & Javidannia, L. (2021). Generative design workflow for seismic-efficient architectural design of tall buildings; A multi-object optimization approach. London: SimAUD. ACM Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. I. (2020). A study of building information modeling (BIM) uptake and proposed evaluation framework. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 25, 452–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerosuo, H., Miettinen, R., Paavola, S., Mäki, T., & Korpela, J. (2015). Challenges of the expansive. Production, 25, 289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsogiannis, A., & Berntsen, N. (2017). Blockchain and construction: The how, why and when. Retrieved from: constructionmanagermagazine.com/technology
   Google Scholar
• Kurwi, S., Demian, P., Blay, K. B., & Hassan, T. M. (2021). Collaboration through integrated BIM and GIS for the design process in rail projects: Formalising the requirements. Infrastructures, 6(4), 52.
   Google Scholar
• Kymmell, W. (2008). Building information modeling: Planning and managing construction projects with 4D CAD and simulations (McGraw-Hill construction series). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Leygonie, R., Motamedi, A., & Iordanova, I. (2022). Development of quality improvement procedures and tools for facility management BIM. Developments in the Built Environment, 11, 100075. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100075
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H., & Guerrero, J. R. (2020). Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Construction management and economics, 38(5), 468–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López de Aguileta, G., Torras-Gómez, E., García-Carrión, R., & Flecha, R. (2020). The emergence of the language of desire toward nonviolent relationships during the dialogic literary gatherings. Language and Education, 34(6), 583–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. (2010). In search of the magic bullet: Building Informational modelling, garbage in, gospel out.
   Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf, T., & Balouktsi, M. (2020). The level of knowledge, use and acceptance of LCA among designers in Germany: A contribution to IEA EBC Annex 72. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 588, p. 042046). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Xiong, F., Olawumi, T. O., Dong, N., & Chan, A. P. (2018). Conceptual framework and roadmap approach for integrating BIM into lifecycle project management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(6), 05018011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavinejad, M., Bemanian, M., Abolvardi, G., & Mohammadmehdi Elhamian, S. (2012). Analyzing the state of seismic consideration of architectural non-structural components (ANSCs) in design process (based on IBC). International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 3(2), 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (2021). Productivity in the construction industry, UK: 2021. Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, H., Garner, M., Manewa, A., & Chadee, A. (2024). Validating the relative importance of technology diffusion barriers–exploring modular construction design-build practices in the UK. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 1–21. Ahead of Print.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, H., & Ramjarrie, K. (2021). Cloud contractor selection model for design-build open tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021020. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. California: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., Kerosuo, H., Metsälä, T., & Paavola, S. (2018). Bridging the life cycle: A case study on facility management infrastructures and uses of BIM. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migilinskas, D., Popov, V., Juocevicius, V., & Ustinovichius, L. (2013). The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia engineering, 57, 767–774.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustapha, A. A., Mohamad, M. F., & Noorhani, N. M. A. (2021). A framework of an interior design work delivery process. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naoum, S. G. (2012). Dissertation Research & Writing for Construction Students. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. (2016). What is building information modelling (BIM)? Retrieved from https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/what-is-building-information-modelling-bim
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 17(5), 554–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noghabaei, M., Heydarian, A., Balali, V., & Han, K. (2020). Trend analysis on adoption of virtual and augmented reality in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Data, 5(1), 26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorifard, A., & Mehdizadeh Saraj, F. (2018). Role of architects in the seismic performance of conventional medium-rise buildings by using the experiences of past earthquakes. Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 8(1), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Opsal, T., Wolgemuth, J., Cross, J., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E., Colomer, S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). “There are no known benefits … ” Considering the risk/benefit ratio of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1137–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotidou, N., Pitt, M., & Lu, Q. (2022). Building information modelling execution plans: A global review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 176(3), 126–147.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PDSI Construction consultants. (2019). Building information modelling BIM- the future of construction projects. Retrieved from https://www.pdsiconsult.com/building-information-modelling-bim-the-future-of-construction-projects/
   Google Scholar
• Penttilä, H. (2007). Early architectural design and BIM. In Computer-aided architectural design futures (CAADFutures) 2007: Proceedings of the 12th International CAADFutures conference (pp. 291–302). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathnasinghe, A., Wijewickrama, M., Kulatunga, U., & Jayasena, H. (2020). Integration of BIM and construction supply chain through supply chain management; An information flow model. In ICSBE 2018: Proceedings of the 9th International conference on sustainable built environment (pp. 604–614). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• RIBA. (2020). RIBA plan of works. https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/riba-plan-of-work
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., Baker, J. D., & Ponton, M. K. (2013). Social science research design and statistics: A practitioner's guide to research methods and IBM SPSS. Virginia: Watertree Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Sabet, M., Zekavat, P., & Mostafa, S.. (2018). BIM attributes for addressing the causes of disputes in construction projects. Joint Asia-Pacific Network for Housing Research and Australasian Housing Researchers Conference. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, June 6-8 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European journal of information systems, 20(2), 168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, R. (2011). Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 18(2), 176–187.
   Google Scholar
• Shahruddin, S., & Husain, S. H. (2024). Navigating paradoxes of identity and leadership in the age of digital transformation of construction industry: Architects’ experiences and perceptions. Construction Management and Economics, 1–19. Ahead of Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahruddin, S., Zairul, M., & Haron, A. T. (2021). Redefining the territory and competency of architectural practitioners within a BIM-based environment: A systematic review. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(5–6), 376–410. doi:10.1080/17452007.2020.1768506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V., Gu, N., & Wang, X. (2011). A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva, J., & London, K. (2012). Client learning for successful architect-client relationships. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(3), 253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, H. L. (2013). Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social health. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 1(2), 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tabarroki, S., Nazari, A., & Banihashemi, S. (2024). Risk stages and factors in architectural design-A structural equation modelling. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(1), 79–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass, S., & Gustavsson, T. K. (2017). Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change. Construction Management and Economics, 35(10), 597–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2022). Workflow for applying optimization-based design exploration to early-stage architectural design–Case study based on EvoMass. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20(1), 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, X., Shou, W., & Xu, B. (2014). Integrating BIM and augmented reality for interactive architectural visualisation. Construction Innovation, 14(4), 453–476.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. A. (2012). The integration of building information modeling and integrated project delivery into the construction management curriculum. In 2012 ASEE annual conference & exposition (pp. 25.1317.1311–1325.1317, 1314).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-C., Ho, M.-C., Lai, M.-M., & Chen, Y.-H. (2016). Humanizing building with digital technology: Frank Gehry's architectural evolution. In 2016 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Ma, L., & Ding, L. (2014). A framework for BIM-enabled life-cycle information management of construction project. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 11(8), 126.
   Google Scholar
• Zanni, M. A., Soetanto, R., & Ruikar, K. (2017). Towards a BIM-enabled sustainable building design process: roles, responsibilities, and requirements. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(2), 101–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayas-Cabán, T., Okubo, T. H., & Posnack, S. (2023). Priorities to accelerate workflow automation in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(1), 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar