Multiple initiators and dyes for continuous Digital Light Processing (cDLP) additive manufacture of resorbable bone tissue engineering scaffolds

References

• Bártolo, P.J., ed., 2011. Stereolithography materials, processes and applications. New York: Springer. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, S., Xi, J., and Chua, C.K., 2012. A novel bone scaffold design approach based on shape function and all-hexahedral mesh refinement. Methods in Molecular Biology, 868, 45–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke, M.N., et al., 2003. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 64 (2), 65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione, C.E., Greco, A., and Maffezzoli, A. 2003. Photopolymerization kinetics of an epoxy based resin for stereolithography. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 72 (2), 687–693. 10.1023/A:1024558506949
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Rodriguesa, J., et al., 2012. Hydroxyapatite surface roughness: complex modulation of the osteoclastogenesis of human precursor cells. Acta Biomaterialia, 8 (3), 1137–1145. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, D., et al., 2012. Continuous digital light processing (cDLP): highly accurate additive manufacturing of tissue engineered bone scaffolds. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 7 (1), 13–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Detsch, R., et al., 2012. In vitro: osteoclastic activity studies on surfaces of 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 26 (3), 359–380. 10.1177/0885328210373285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J.P., Dean, D., and Mikos, A.G. 2002. Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly(propylene fumarate) biomaterials. Biomaterials, 23, 4333–4343. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00178-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J.P., et al., 2003. Photoinitiated cross-linking of the biodegradable polyester poly(propylene fumarate). Part II. In vitro degradation. Biomacromolecules, 4, 1335–1342. 10.1021/bm0300296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauvin, R., et al., 2012. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials, 33 (15), 3824–3834. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittard, S.D. and Narayan, R.J., 2010. Laser direct writing of micro- and nano-scale medical devices. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 7 (3), 343–356. 10.1586/erd.10.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister, S.J., 2005. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 4 (7), 518–524. 10.1038/nmat1421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbeck, L.J., 1997. Digital Light Processing for high-brightness high-resolution applications. In: M.H. Wu, ed. Projection Displays III. San Jose: Projection Displays III, Proceedings of SPIE, 3013 (27), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kasko, A.M., 2013. Degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for 2D and 3D cell culture. Sigma-Aldrich. Available from: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/material-matters/degradable-polyethylene-glycol-hydrogels.html [Accessed 26 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, F.K., et al., 2009. Synthesis of poly(propylene fumarate). Nature Protocols, 4 (4), 518–525. 10.1038/nprot.2009.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, S.J., et al., 2012. Fabrication of 3-dimensional cellular constructs via microstereolithography using a simple, three-component, poly (ethylene glycol) acrylate-based system. Biomacromolecules, 14 (1), 186–192. 10.1021/bm3015736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., et al., 2013. Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture. Biomaterials, 34 (2), 331–339. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liska, R., et al., 2005. Water-soluble photopolymers for rapid prototyping of cellular materials. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 97 (6), 2286–2298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. and Lun, D.X., 2012. Current application of β-tricalcium phosphate composites in orthopaedics. Orthopaedic Surgery, 4 (3), 139–144. 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00189.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu, Y. and Chen, S., 2012. Projection printing of 3-dimensional tissue scaffolds. Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology, 868, 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Melchels, F.P., Feijen, J., and Grijpma, D.W., 2010. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials, 31 (24), 6121–6130. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Zhou, C., and Chen, Y., 2012. A fast mask projection stereolithography process for fabricating digital models in minutes. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 134 (5), pp. 051011, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P., 5 Mar 2013. Micro 3-D printer creates tiny structures in seconds. MIT's technology review. Available from: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511856/micro-3-d-printer-creates-tiny-structures-in-seconds/?utm_campaign = newsletters&utm_source = newsletter-daily-all&utm_medium = email&utm_content = 20130305 [Accessed 19 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Puppi, D., et al., 2010. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science, 35 (4), 403–440.
   Google Scholar
• Ronca, A., Ambrosio, L., and Grijpma, D.W., 2013. Preparation of designed poly(D,L-lactide)/nanosized hydroxyapatite composite structures by stereolithography. Acta Biomaterialia, 9 (4), 5989–5996. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, E., et al., 2012. Strut size and surface area effects on long-term in vivo degradation in computer designed poly(L-lactic acid) three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia 8 (7), 2568–2577. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, G. and MacCreath, B., 2010. Biodegradable polymers – analysis of biodegradable polymers by GPC/SEC: Application Compendium. Agilent Technologies. Available from: http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/applications/US5990-6920EN.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Stakleff, K.S., et al., 2013. Resorbable, amino acid-based poly(ester urea)s crosslinked with osteogenic growth peptide with enhanced mechanical properties and bioactivity. Acta Biomaterialia, 9 (2), 5132–5142. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., et al., in press. Validating continuous digital light processing (cDLP) additive manufacturing accuracy and tissue engineering utility of a dye-initiator package. Biofabrication.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.O., et al., 2013. Evaluation of the in vitro cytotoxicity of cross-linked biomaterials. Biomacromolecules, 14 (5), 1321–1329. 10.1021/bm301962f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicker, R.B., Medina, F., and Elkins, C.J., 2004. Multiple material micro-fabrication: extending stereolithography to tissue engineering and other novel application. In: Proceedings of 15th annual solid freeform fabrication symposium, August 2–4, 2004. Austin, TX. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 754–764. Available from: http://mae.mst.edu/seminarsandcolloquia/symposia/.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.M., et al., 2005. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials, 26 (23), 4817–4827. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, D., 2012. New paradigms in internal architecture design and freeform fabrication of tissue engineering porous scaffolds. Medical Engineering & Physics, 34 (6), 762–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zouani, O.F., et al., 2013. Insights into the osteoblast precursor differentiation towards mature osteoblasts induced by continuous BMP-2 signaling. Biology Open, 2 (9), 872–881. 10.1242/bio.20134986
   Google Scholar