Optimisation of FDM process parameters by Taguchi method for imparting customised properties to components

References

• Ahn, S.-H., et al., 2002. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8 (4), 248–257. doi: 10.1108/13552540210441166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., and Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118 (1), 385–388. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creveling, Clyde M. and Fowlkes, William Y., 1995. Engineering methods for robust product design. Chicago: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, G., et al., 2018. Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by Taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures. Additive Manufacturing, 19, 62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, V., and Jain, P.K., 2016. Experimental investigations on fused deposition modelling of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposite. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11 (2), 109–121. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1172431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurrala, P.K., and Regalla, S.P., 2014. Multi-objective optimisation of strength and volumetric shrinkage of FDM parts. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 9 (2), 127–138. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2014.898851
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, N., et al., 2017. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12 (1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C., 2003. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Motaparti, K.P., et al., 2017. Experimental investigation of effects of build parameters on flexural properties in fused deposition modelling parts. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12 (3), 207–220. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1314117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phadke, Madhav Shridhar, 1989. Quality engineering using robust design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rathee, S., et al., 2017. Effect of varying spatial orientations on build time requirements for FDM process: a case study. Defence Technology, 13 (2), 92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, R.K., 2001. Design of experiments using the Taguchi method approach. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., and Mahapatra, S.S., 2009. Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Materials & Design, 30 (10), 4243–4252. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M., 2015. Some studies on layout of generative manufacturing processes for functional components. New Delhi: Delhi University.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M., Maheshwari, S., and Kundra, T.K., 2015. Virtual modelling and simulation of functionally graded material component using FDM technique. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2 (4), 3471–3480. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.323
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M., et al., 2016. Virtual design, modelling and analysis of functionally graded materials by fused deposition modeling. Materials Today: Proceedings, 3 (10, Part B), 3660–3665. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.11.010
   Google Scholar
• Stratasys. Insight Help/Glossary, Stratasys.
   Google Scholar
• Stratasys, Fortus 250mc, 2015. Available from: http://www.stratasys.com/3d-printers/design-series/fortus-250mc.
   Google Scholar
• System Documentation, S.I., FDM, 1998, FDM®.
   Google Scholar
• Thrimurthulu, K., Pandey, P.M., and Venkata, R.N., 2004. Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44 (6), 585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezi, M., et al., 2013. Multiple material additive manufacturing – part 1: a review. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 8 (1), 19–50. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2013.778175
   Google Scholar
• Wohlers, 2012. Additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry. Colorado: Wohlers Associates.
   Google Scholar