An integrated design methodology for components produced by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process

References

• Adam, G.A.O. and Zimmer, D., 2014. Design for additive manufacturing-element transitions and aggregated structures. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 7 (1), 20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2013.10.001
   Google Scholar
• ASTM WK59131. New guide for additive manufacturing, Technical design guideline for powder bed fusion, Part 1: Laser-based powder bed fusion of metals under development. Available from: https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/WORKITEMS/WK59131.htm
   Google Scholar
• Atzeni, E., et al., 2016. Abrasive Fluidized Bed (AFB) finishing of AlSi10Mg substrates manufactured by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). Additive Manufacturing, 10, 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzeni, E., et al., 2010a. Redesign and cost estimation of rapid manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 16 (5), 308–317. doi: 10.1108/13552541011065704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzeni, E., et al., 2010b. Artificial teeth manufacturing: inspection of mould and teeth by contactless scanning systems. In: Innovative developments in design and manufacturing – advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping, 131–136. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203859476/chapters/10.1201%2F9780203859476-25
   Google Scholar
• Atzeni, E. and Salmi, A. 2012. Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 62 (9–12), 1147–1155. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3878-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzeni, E. and Salmi, A. 2015. Study on unsupported overhangs of AlSi10Mg parts processed by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 20, 500–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, H.S. and Lee, K.H, 2005. Determination of optimal build direction in rapid prototyping with variable slicing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28 (3), 307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, F. 2014. Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. Materials and Design, 64 (Supplement C), 203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.043
   Google Scholar
• Calignano, F., et al., 2017. Investigation of accuracy and dimensional limits of part produced in aluminum alloy by selective laser melting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88 (1), 451–458. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8788-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, F. and Manfred, D. 2014. Manfred production of overhanging structures by DMLS. In: P. J. Bartolo, et al., High value manufacturing: advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping: proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, 1–5 October, 2013. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Calignano, F., et al., 2014. Direct fabrication of joints based on direct metal laser sintering in aluminum and titanium alloys. Procedia CIRP, 21 (Supplement C), 129–132. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.155
   Google Scholar
• Calignano, F., et al., 2013. Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67 (9–12), 2743–2751. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4688-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concept Laser GmbH. Available from: http://www.concept-laser.de/en/home.html [Accessed 4 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• EOS GmbH. Available from: http://www.eos.info/ [Accessed 4 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Galjaard, S., et al., 2015. Optimizing structural building elements in metal by using additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structural (IASS) Symposium, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, M.X. and Wong, C.H. 2016. Practical support structures for selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 238 (Supplement C), 474–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.006
   Google Scholar
• GrabCAD, 2016. Airplane bearing bracket challenge. Available from: https://grabcad.com/challenges/airplane-bearing-bracket-challenge [Accessed 6 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Gu, D. D., et al., 2012. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. International Materials Reviews, 57 (3), 133–164. doi: 10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren, S., Pejryd, L., and Ekengren, J. 2016. (Re)design for additive manufacturing. ed. Procedia CIRP, 246-251.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8262-3:2009 (EN), 2009. ISO 8262-3:2009 (EN) – Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Dimensional and geometrical tolerances for moulded parts – Part 3: General dimensional and geometrical tolerances and machining allowances for castings.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/ASTM52915-16, 2016. ISO/ASTM52915-16, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing File Format (AMF) Version 1.2. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Klahn, C., Leutenecker, B., and Meboldt, M. 2015. Design strategies for the process of additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 36 (Supplement C), 230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.082
   Google Scholar
• Kranz, J., Herzog, D., and Emmelmann, C., 2014. Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of lightweight structures in TiAl6V4. Journal of Laser Applications, 27 (S1). doi: 10.2351/1.4885235
   Google Scholar
• Kumke, M., Watschke, H., and Vietor, T. 2016. A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11 (1), 3–19. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1139377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, C., Su, C., and Chiang, A. 2017. Parametric optimization of density and dimensions in three-dimensional printing of Ti-6Al-4V powders on titanium plates using selective laser melting. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18 (11), 1609–1618. doi: 10.1007/s12541-017-0190-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M., et al., 2014. Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Materials & Design, 63 (Supplement C), 678–690. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.015
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, C., et al., 2015. Towards a sustainable and economic selection of part candidates for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (2), 216–227. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. and Ma, Y. 2016. A survey of manufacturing oriented topology optimization methods. Advances in Engineering Software, 100, 161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakkanen, J., et al., 2016. Study of internal channel surface roughnesses manufactured by selective laser melting in aluminum and titanium alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 47 (8), 3837–3844. doi: 10.1007/s11661-016-3478-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulak Mohan, P., Reddy, N.V., and Sanjay, G.D. 2003. Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9 (5), 274–288. doi: 10.1108/13552540310502185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonitis, K. and Zarban, S.A., 2015. Redesign optimization for manufacturing using additive layer techniques. ed. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 193-198.
   Google Scholar
• Schmelzle, J., et al., 2015. (Re)designing for part consolidation: understanding the challenges of metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137 (11), 111404-1–111404-12. doi: 10.1115/1.4031156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonelli, M., Tse, Y.Y., and Tuck, C. 2014. Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 616 (Supplement C), 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.086
   Google Scholar
• Sing, S.L., Wiria, F.E., and Yeong, W.Y. 2018. Selective laser melting of lattice structures: a statistical approach to manufacturability and mechanical behavior. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 49, 170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraskar, N., Paul, R., and Anand, S. 2015. Adaptive slicing in additive manufacturing process using a modified boundary octree data structure. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 137 (1), 011007. doi: 10.1115/1.4028579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, B., et al., 2015. Differences in microstructure and properties between selective laser melting and traditional manufacturing for fabrication of metal parts: a review. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 10 (2), 111–125. doi: 10.1007/s11465-015-0341-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spallek, J., Sankowski, O., and Krause, D., 2016. Influences of additive manufacturing on design processes for customised products. ed. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 513-522.
   Google Scholar
• Spierings, A.B., Herres, N., and Levy, G. 2011. Influence of the particle size distribution on surface quality and mechanical properties in AM steel parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17 (3), 195–202. doi: 10.1108/13552541111124770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola, L., et al., 2014. Rough surfaces with enhanced heat transfer for electronics cooling by direct metal laser sintering. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 75, 58–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadroitsev, I., Krakhmalev, P., and Yadroitsava, I. 2015. Hierarchical design principles of selective laser melting for high quality metallic objects. Additive Manufacturing, 7 (Supplement C), 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2014.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Yap, C.Y., et al., 2015. Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Applied Physics Reviews, 2 (4). doi: 10.1063/1.4935926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasa, E., et al., 2014. Benchmarking of different powder-bed metal fusion processes for machine selection in additive manufacturing. ed. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Zegard, T. and Paulino, G.H. 2016. Bridging topology optimization and additive manufacturing. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53 (1), 175–192. doi: 10.1007/s00158-015-1274-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, K., et al., 2015. Evaluations of effective thermal conductivity of support structures in selective laser melting. Additive Manufacturing, 6 (Supplement C), 67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2015.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. and Rozvany, G.I.N. 1991. The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 89 (1–3), 309–336. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar