Comparison of three-dimensional surface scanning techniques for capturing the external ear

References

• Abbott, L.M., et al., 2017. Smartphone use in dermatology for clinical photography and consultation: current practice and the law. Australasian Journal of Dermatology, 59 (2), 101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung, S.C., Ngim, R.C.K., and Lee, S.T., 1995. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 48 (8), 551–558. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90043-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bos, E.J., et al., 2015. Developing a parametric ear model for auricular reconstruction: A new step towards patient-specific implants. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 43 (3), 390–395. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, B., 1999. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 104 (2), 319–334. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199908000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K., and Belton, S., 2013. Clinicians and their cameras: policy, ethics and practice in an Australian tertiary hospital. Australian Health Review, 37 (4), 437–441. doi: 10.1071/AH12039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cignoni, P., et al., 2008. MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool. The Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference 2008 was held in Salerno, Italy. https://dblp.org/db/conf/egItaly/egItaly2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ciocca, L., et al., 2007. CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98 (5), 339–343. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60116-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, L.G., Posnick, J.C., and Hreczko, T.M., 1992. Anthropometric growth study of the head. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 29 (4), 303–308. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0303:AGSOTH>2.3.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, R.L., et al., 2017. The technique for 3D printing patient-specific models for auricular reconstruction. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45 (6), 937–943. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardeau-Montaut, D., 2017. CloudCompare – an open source project.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Xue, G.H., and Fu, J.Z., 2014. Fabrication of low cost soft tissue prostheses with the desktop 3D printer. Scientific Reports, 4, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, A.L., Lewin, S.L., and Im, D.D., 2017. Teasing in younger and older children with microtia before and after ear reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 51 (3), 205–209. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1222294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, A.L., et al., 2015. Pre and post-operative psychological functioning in younger and older children with microtia. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 68 (4), 492–497. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoops, P.G.M., et al., 2017. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 70 (4), 441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutny, D., et al., 2012. 3D digitalization of the human body for use in orthotics and prosthetics. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 72 (12), 1487–1494.
   Google Scholar
• Liacouras, P., et al., 2011. Designing and manufacturing an auricular prosthesis using computed tomography, 3-dimensional photographic imaging, and additive manufacturing: A clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 105 (2), 78–82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60002-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A.J., Bernstein, J.L., and Spector, J.A., 2018. Ear reconstruction and 3D printing: Is It reality? Current Surgery Reports, 6 (2), 517. doi: 10.1007/s40137-018-0198-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luquetti, D.V., Leoncini, E., and Mastroiacovo, P., 2011. Microtia-anotia: a global review of prevalence rates. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 91 (9), 813–822. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M.I., et al., 2018. Augmented patient-specific facial prosthesis production using medical imaging modelling and 3D printing technologies for improved patient outcomes. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 13 (2), P164–176. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1446122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichinger, A., et al., 2013. Evaluation of methods for optical 3d scanning of human pinna. International Conference IEEE, 2013, 390–397.
   Google Scholar
• Reiffel, A.J., et al., 2013. High-Fidelity tissue engineering of patient-specific auricles for reconstruction of pediatric microtia and other auricular deformities. PLoS ONE, 8 (2), e56506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M.T., et al., 2018. Aesthetic reconstruction of microtia: a review of current techniques and new 3D printing approaches. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 13 (2), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1493803
   Google Scholar
• Salazar-Gamarra, R., et al., 2016. Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: A method for making facial prostheses. Journal of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 45 (1), 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0145-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subburaj, K., et al., 2007. Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36 (10), 938–943. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson, T.T., 2006. Advances in the treatment of microtia. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 14 (6), 412–422. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328010633a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unkovskiy, A., et al., 2018. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volonghi, P., Baronio, G., and Signoroni, A., 2018. 3D scanning and geometry processing techniques for customised hand orthotics: an experimental assessment. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 13 (2), 105–116. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1426328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonc, C., 2015. Aire et Volume [online]. Available from: http://code.vonc.fr/?a=40.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., et al., 2018. In vitro regeneration of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage and its first clinical application for auricular reconstruction. EBioMedicine, 28, 287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar