Sustainable product design by large format additive manufacturing of cork composites

References

• Li Y, Ren X, Zhu L, et al. Biomass 3D printing: principles, materials, post-processing and applications. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15:2692. doi:10.3390/polym15122692
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Nieto D, Molina SI. Large-format fused deposition additive manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020;26:793–799. doi:10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0126
   Google Scholar
• Pignatelli F, Percoco G. An application- and market-oriented review on large format additive manufacturing, focusing on polymer pellet-based 3D printing. Prog Addit Manuf. 2022;7:1363–1377. doi:10.1007/s40964-022-00309-3
   Google Scholar
• Rajvanshi J, Sogani M, Kumar A, et al. Perceiving biobased plastics as an alternative and innovative solution to combat plastic pollution for a circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 2023;874:162441. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162441
   Google Scholar
• Romani A, Levi M, Pearce JM. Recycled polycarbonate and polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene feedstocks for circular economy product applications with fused granular fabrication-based additive manufacturing. Sustain Mater Technol. 2023;38:e00730. doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00730
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Nieto D, Casal López V, Molina SI. Large-format polymeric pellet-based additive manufacturing for the naval industry. Addit Manuf. 2018;23:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.012
   Google Scholar
• Nieto DM, Pintos PB, Sánchez DM, et al. Large format additive manufacturing in furniture design with novel cork based polymeric materials. In: Francisco Cavas-Martínez, Manuel D. Marín Granados, Ramón Mirálbes Buil and Oscar D. de-Cózar-Macías, editors. Advances in design engineering III. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 477–489.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Suh S. Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9:374–378. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z
   Google Scholar
• Rahman AM, Rahman TT, Pei Z, et al. Additive manufacturing using agriculturally derived biowastes: a systematic literature review. Bioengineering. 2023;10:845. doi:10.3390/bioengineering10070845
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Mano JF, et al. Novel cork–polymer composites reinforced with short natural coconut fibres: effect of fibre loading and coupling agent addition. Compos Sci Technol. 2013;78:56–62. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.021
   Google Scholar
• Camarero JJ, Sánchez-Miranda Á, Colangelo M, et al. Climatic drivers of cork growth depend on site aridity. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169574. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169574
   Google Scholar
• Mestre A, Vogtlander J. Eco-efficient value creation of cork products: an LCA-based method for design intervention. J Clean Prod. 2013;57:101–114. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.023
   Google Scholar
• Ramos T, Matos AM, Sousa-Coutinho J. Strength and durability of mortar using cork waste ash as cement replacement. Mater Res. 2014;17:893–907. doi:10.1590/S1516-14392014005000092
   Google Scholar
• Atanes E, Nieto-Márquez A, Cambra A, et al. Adsorption of SO2 onto waste cork powder-derived activated carbons. Chem Eng J. 2012;211–212:60–67. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.043
   Google Scholar
• Novais RM, Senff L, Carvalheiras J, et al. Sustainable and efficient cork - inorganic polymer composites: An innovative and eco-friendly approach to produce ultra-lightweight and low thermal conductivity materials. Cem Concr Compos. 2019;97:107–117. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.024
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Mano JF, et al. Cork–polymer biocomposites: mechanical, structural and thermal properties. Mater Des. 2015;82:282–289. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.040
   Google Scholar
• Niknejad A, Moradi A. A novel solid cylindrical composite material made of agglomerated cork inserts and silicone rubber resin during the flattening process. Int J Mech Sci. 2016;115–116:105–122. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Martins CI, Gil V. Processing–structure–properties of cork polymer composites. Front Mater. 2020;7:297. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389fmats.2020.00297
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Ocaña I, Molina SI. Cork photocurable resin composite for stereolithography (SLA): influence of cork particle size on mechanical and thermal properties. Addit Manuf. 2022;51:102586. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102586
   Google Scholar
• Gama N, Ferreira A, Evtuguin D, et al. Modified cork/SEBS composites for 3D printed elastomers. Polym Adv Technol. 2022;33:1881–1891. doi:10.1002/pat.5644
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez Gómez M, Moreno Nieto D, Moreno Sánchez D, et al. Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic polyurethane-cork composites for material extrusion technologies. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15:3291. doi:10.3390/polym15153291
   Google Scholar
• de León AS, Núñez-Gálvez F, Moreno-Sánchez D, et al. Polymer composites with cork particles functionalized by surface polymerization for fused deposition modeling. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2022;4:1225–1233. doi:10.1021/acsapm.1c01632
   Google Scholar
• TDS SMARTFIL CORK, Accessed: July 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.smartmaterials3d.com/en/cork.
   Google Scholar
• Klyusov N, Garin N, Usenyuk-Kravchuk S, et al. A biomorphic approach to designing special-purpose vehicles for Arctic conditions. Biomimetics. 2023;8:360. doi:10.3390/biomimetics8040360
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhao Y, Chi Y, et al. Shape-morphing materials and structures for energy-efficient building envelopes. Mater Today Energy. 2021;22:100874. doi:10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100874
   Google Scholar
• Kumar DS, Purani K, Viswanathan SA. The indirect experience of nature: biomorphic design forms in servicescapes. J Serv Mark. 2020;34:847–867. doi:10.1108/JSM-10-2019-0418
   Google Scholar
• Tao J, Tahmasebi P, Kader MA, et al. Wood biomimetics: capturing and simulating the mesoscale complexity of willow using cross-correlation reconstruction algorithm and 3D printing. Mater Des. 2023;228:111812. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111812
   Google Scholar
• Ufodike CO, Ahmed MF, Dolzyk G. Additively manufactured biomorphic cellular structures inspired by wood microstructure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;123:104729. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104729
   Google Scholar
• F. Pérez-Arribas, parametric generation of small ship hulls with CAD software. J Mar Sci Eng. 2023;11:976. doi:10.3390/jmse11050976
   Google Scholar
• Efstathiadis A, Symeonidou I, Tsongas K, et al. Parametric design and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed PLA composite biomimetic voronoi lattices inspired by the stereom of sea urchins. J Compos Sci. 2023;7:3. doi:10.3390/jcs7010003
   Google Scholar
• Gokmen S. Stripped and layered fabrication of minimal surface tectonics using parametric algorithms. Curved Layered Struct. 2023;10:20220210. doi:10.1515/cls-2022-0210
   Google Scholar
• Costantino D, Grimaldi A, Pepe M. 3D modelling of buildings and urban areas using grasshopper and Rhinocersos. Geographia Technica. 2022;17:167–176. doi:10.21163/GT_2022.171.13
   Google Scholar
• García-Dominguez A, Claver J, Sebastián MA. Optimization methodology for additive manufacturing of customized parts by fused deposition modeling (FDM). application to a shoe heel. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:2119. doi:10.3390/POLYM12092119
   Google Scholar
• Burgos Pintos P, Sanz de León A, Molina SI. Large format additive manufacturing of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by material extrusion. Addit Manuf. 2024;79:103908. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103908
   Google Scholar
• Duty C, Ajinjeru C, Kishore V, et al. A viscoelastic model for extrusion-based 3D printing of polymers what makes a material printable ? J Manuf Process. 2017;Submitted:526–537. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Ajinjeru C, Kishore V, Liu P, et al. Determination of melt processing conditions for high performance amorphous thermoplastics for large format additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt LA, Orski SV, Migler KB, et al. Effect of processing conditions on crystallization kinetics during materials extrusion additive manufacturing. Polymer. 2018;154:182–187. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.018
   Google Scholar
• Burgos Pintos P, Moreno Sánchez D, Delgado FJ, et al. Influence of the carbon fiber length distribution in polymer matrix composites for large format additive manufacturing via fused granular fabrication. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16:60. doi:10.3390/polym16010060
   Google Scholar
• Yeole P, Hassen AA, Kim S, et al. Mechanical characterization of high-temperature carbon fiber-polyphenylene sulfide composites for large area extrusion deposition additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101255. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101255
   Google Scholar
• Copenhaver K, Smith T, Armstrong K, et al. Recyclability of additively manufactured bio-based composites. Compos B Eng. 2023;255:110617. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110617
   Google Scholar
• Brites F, Malça C, Gaspar F, et al. Cork plastic composite optimization for 3D printing applications. Procedia Manuf. 2017;12:156–165. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.020
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães da Silva SP, Antunes T, Costa MEV, et al. Cork-like filaments for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101229. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101229
   Google Scholar
• Daver F, Lee KPM, Brandt M, et al. Cork–PLA composite filaments for fused deposition modelling. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;168:230–237. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Nóvoa PJRO, Ribeiro MCS, Ferreira AJM, et al. Mechanical characterization of lightweight polymer mortar modified with cork granulates. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64:2197–2205. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Dairi B, Bellili N, Hamour N, et al. Cork waste valorization as reinforcement in high-density polyethylene matrix. Mater Today Proc. 2022;53:117–122. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.420
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi A, Wirz F. Aad algorithms-aided design: parametric strategies using grasshopper. Brienza: Le Penseur; 2015.
   Google Scholar