REFERENCES
- The Autopsy and Audit. Report of the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1991
- The Coroner’s Autopsy: Do we deserve better? A report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. 2006
- Sloka K, Schilt G. Utilization of the postmortem examination with emphasis on audiovisual aids. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111: 883–884
- Belanger AJ, Lopes AE, Sinard J. Implementation of a practical digital imaging system for routine gross photography in an autopsy environment. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 160–165
- Park R‐W, Eom J‐H, Byun H‐Y, Park P, Lee K‐B, Joo H‐J. Automation of gross specimen photography using a remote‐controlled digital camera system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127: 726–731
- Marshall RJ, Evans RW, Judd BM. Television and video in the medical school: facilities, scope and management of a small production unit. J Audiov Media Med 1981; 4: 80–85
- Digital Images as Evidence United Kingdom Government House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Fifth Report. 1998
- Digital Imaging Procedure: Version 1.0. United Kingdom Home Office, Police Scientific Development Branch. 2002
- Doctors for Sexual Abuse Care National Newsletter, issue 42, December 1999. Comments of Judge PA Moran, District Court. QueenstownNew Zealand, http://www.dsac.org.nz/newsletter/news42.pdf (Accessed 25/01/2007)
- Excerpts of a Decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals: In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson: September 9, 2003 Session, State v. Detrick Cole, http://www.tncourts.gov/OPINIONS/TSC/PDF/051/ColeX.pdf (Accessed 25/01/2007)