References
- Andrade, C. (2011a). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 172–175. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82558
- Andrade, C. (2011b). Placeboxetine for major depressive disorder: Researcher, author, reader, and reviewer perspectives on randomized controlled trials. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 73–76. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.75553
- Andrade, C., & Mendhekar, D.N. (2010). Lithium, trifluperazine and idiopathic leucopenia: Author and reviewer perspectives on how to write a good case report. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 187–190. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.64594
- Bugeja, J., & Grech, V. (2015). Email solicitation for scholarly work – A single researcher’s perspective. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 38, 231–233. doi:10.3109/17453054.2015.1108294
- Campbell, M.J., & Swinscow, T.D.V. (2011). Statistics at square one. London: British Medical Journal.
- Chipperfield, L., Citrome, L., Clark, J., David, F.S., Enck, R., Evangelista, M., … Weigel, A. (2010). Authors’ submission toolkit: A practical guide to getting your research published. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 26, 1967–1982. doi:10.1185/03007995.2010.499344
- Coles, B. (1993). The STM information system in the UK. (No. 6123).
- Grech, M., Debono, J., Xuereb, R.G., Fenech, A., & Grech, V. (2012). A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 80, 576–580. doi:10.1002/ccd.23415
- Schoenwolf, G.C. (2013). Getting published well requires fulfilling editors’ and reviewers’ needs and desires. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 55, 735–743. doi:10.1111/dgd.12092
- Lissauer, T., & Carrol, W. (Eds.). (2016). The Science of Paediatrics MRCPCH mastercourse. London: Elsevier.