Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 87, 2016 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
2,209
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old

Masako TsukanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Vera HalvorsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo;
,
Lars NordslettenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo;
,
Ingvild Ø EngesæTerThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
Lars B EngesæTerThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
Anne Marie FenstadThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
&
Stephan M RöhrlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo;
show all
Pages 479-484 | Received 21 Dec 2015, Accepted 01 Jun 2016, Published online: 20 Jul 2016

  • Adelani M A, Crook K, Barrack R L, Maloney W J, Clohisy J C. What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(5): 1518–25.
  • Adolphson P Y, Salemyr M O, Skoldenberg O G, Boden H S. Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(1): 14–9.
  • Aksnes L H, Bauer H C, Jebsen N L, Folleras G, Allert C, Haugen G S, et al. Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90(6): 786–94.
  • Bessette B J, Fassier F, Tanzer M, Brooks C E. Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 21 years: a minimum, 10-year follow-up. Can J Surg 2003; 46(4): 257–62.
  • Bischel O, Seeger J B, Kruger M, Bitsch R G. Multiple acetabular revisions in THA - poor outcome despite maximum effort. Open Orthop J 2012; 6: 488–94.
  • Brooker A F, Bowerman J W, Robinson R A, Riley L H, Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1973; 55(8): 1629–32.
  • Cage D J, Granberry W M, Tullos H S. Long-term results of total arthroplasty in adolescents with debilitating polyarthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (283): 156–62.
  • Claus A M, Engh C A, Jr, Sychterz C J, Xenos JS, Orishimo K F, Engh C A, Sr. Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85-A(8): 1519–26.
  • Deirmengian G K, Zmistowski B, O’Neil J T, Hozack W J. Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93(19): 1842–52.
  • Della Valle C J, Paprosky W G. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420): 55–62.
  • Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Herberts P. 5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(6): 746–54.
  • Dunbar M J, Prasad V, Weerts B, Richardson G. Metal-on-metal hip surface replacement: the routine use is not justified. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (11 Supple A): 17–21.
  • Engh C A, Glassman A H, Suthers K E. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (261): 63–81.
  • Flugsrud G B, Nordsletten L, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Meyer H E. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(1): 99–107.
  • Gartlehner G, Hansen R A, Jonas B L, Thieda P, Lohr K N. Biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and critical analysis of the evidence. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27(1): 67–76.
  • Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(4): 337–53.
  • Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Engesaeter L B. The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84(6): 839–45.
  • Hodgkinson J P, Shelley P, Wroblewski B M. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (228): 105–9.
  • Johnston R C, Fitzgerald R H, Jr, Harris W H, Poss R, Muller M E, Sledge C B. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(2): 161–8.
  • Khanuja H S, Vakil J J, Goddard M S, Mont M A. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93(5): 500–9.
  • Kim Y H, Kim J S, Park J W, Joo J H. Periacetabular osteolysis is the problem in contemporary total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(1): 74–81.
  • Lie S A, Havelin L I, Furnes O N, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86(4): 504–9.
  • Mueller L A, Kress A, Nowak T, Pfander D, Pitto R P, Forst R, et al. Periacetabular bone changes after uncemented total hip arthroplasty evaluated by quantitative computed tomography. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(3): 380–5.
  • Münger P, Roder C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Busato A. Patient-related risk factors leading to aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study of 5,035 patients. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(4): 567–74.
  • Paprosky W G, Perona P G, Lawrence J M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9(1): 33–44.
  • Sakellariou V I, Babis G C. Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 614–22.
  • Sandgren B, Crafoord J, Olivecrona H, Garellick G, Weidenhielm L. Risk factors for periacetabular osteolysis and wear in asymptomatic patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasties. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014: 905818.
  • Schmitz M W, Busch V J, Gardeniers J W, Hendriks J C, Veth R P, Schreurs B W. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 37.
  • Torchia M E, Klassen R A, Bianco A J. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients less than twenty years old. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78(7): 995–1003.
  • Wangen H, Lereim P, Holm I, Gunderson R, Reikeras O. Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem. Int Orthop 2008; 32(2): 203–8.
  • Wroblewski B M, Purbach B, Siney P D, Fleming P A. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in teenage patients: the ultimate challenge. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92(4): 486–8.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.