Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 88, 2017 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
4,723
Views
113
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

An analysis of 166,231 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)

Wierd P ZijlstraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Bas De HartogDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden;
,
Liza N Van SteenbergenLandelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Arthroplasty Register), ’s Hertogenbosch;
,
B Willem ScheursDepartment of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen;
&
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
Pages 395-401 | Received 20 Jun 2016, Accepted 10 Mar 2017, Published online: 25 Apr 2017

  • Amlie E, Havelin L I, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, Dimmen S. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(5): 463–9.
  • Arthursson A J, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Soreide J A. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty - does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(6): 719–29.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry Annual report. Adelaide: AOA; 2015.
  • Barrett W P, Turner S E, Leopold J P. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs. postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28:1634–8.
  • Berry D J, von Knoch M, Schleck C D, Harmsen W S. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(11): 2456–63.
  • Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Titolo P, Ventura S, Massazza G. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative years: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Hip Int 2011; 21(5): 559–64.
  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes B, Havelin L I; Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary total hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(5): 514–24.
  • Christensen C P, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs C A. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1839–41.
  • Clyburn T A. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 3409–11.
  • Dudda M, Gueleryuez A, Gautier E, Busato A, Roeder C. Risk factors for early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2010; 18: 179–83.
  • De Geest T, Fennema P, Lenaerts, De Loore G. Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135: 1183–92.
  • Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Carret J P, Bejui-Hugues J. Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 849–58.
  • Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Bejui-Hugues J. Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 567: 465–72.
  • Gwo-Chin L, Marconi D. Complications following direct anterior hip procedures: costs to both patients and surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(1): 98–101.
  • Hailer N P, Weiss R J, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (5): 442–8.
  • Higgins BT, Barlow D R, Heagerty N E, Lin TJ . Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 419–34.
  • Howie D, Holubowycz O T, Middleton R, Large articulation study group. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1095–102.
  • Kennon R E, Keggi J M, Wetmore R S, Zatorski L E, Huo M H, Keggi K J. Total hip arthroplasty through minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(suppl4): 39–48.
  • Keurentjes J C, Fiocco M, Schreurs B W, Pijls B G, Nouta K A, Nelissen R G. Revision surgery is overestimated in hip replacement. Bone Joint Res 2012; 1(10): 258–62.
  • Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä KT. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. A population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (4): 342–7.
  • Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (LROI); LROI Report 2015 Blik op uitkomsten; ‘s Hertogenbosch: Netherlands Orthopaedic Association.
  • Lindgren V, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hip replacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 559–65.
  • Mansonis J L, Bourne R B. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (405): 46–53.
  • Matta J M, Ferguson T A. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics 2005; 28(9): 927–8.
  • Meek R M, Allan D B, McPhillips G, Kerr L, Howie C R. Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; (447): 9–18.
  • Panichkul P, Parks N, Ho H, Hopper R H Jr, Hamilton W G. New approach and stem increased femoral revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2015; 31: 1–7.
  • Phillips C B, Barrett J A, Losina E, Mahomed N N, Lingard E A, Guadagnoli E, Baron J A, Harris W H, Poss R, Katz J N. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism and deep infection during the first six months of elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (1): 20–6.
  • Ries M D, Pruitt I. Effect of cross-linking on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (440): 149–56.
  • Sariali E, Lazennec J Y, Khiami F, Catonne Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty. Influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(3): 277–82.
  • Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio M C S, Paxton E W, Namba R S. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 3401–8.
  • Van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A W, Spooren A, van Rooden S M, van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, Nelissen R G. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register; External validation of 311,890 procedures. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 498–505.
  • De Steiger R N, Lorimer M, Solomon M. What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (12): 3860–6.
  • Stroh D A, Issa K, Johnson AJ, Delanois R E, Mont M A. Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1415–20.
  • Van der Veen H C, Reininga I H, Zijlstra W P, Boomsma M F, Bulstra S K, van Raay J J. Pseudotumor incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 1481–7.
  • Verheyen C C, Verhaar J A. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements. Lancet 2012; 380: 105.
  • Wongworawat M D, Dobbs M B, Gebhardt M C, Gioe T J, Leopold S S, Manner P A, Rimnac C M, Porcher R. Editorial: estimating survivorship in the face of competing risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(4); 1173–6.
  • Zijlstra W P, Van den Akker-Scheek I, Zee M J, Van Raay J J. No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 2011; 35 (12): 1771–6.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.