Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 90, 2019 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
2,254
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Resurfacing hip arthroplasty better preserves a normal gait pattern at increasing walking speeds compared to total hip arthroplasty

Davey M J M GerhardtDepartment of Orthopedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem;;
,
Thijs G Ter MorsDepartment of Orthopedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem;;
,
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
&
Job L C Van SusanteDepartment of Orthopedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem;; Correspondence[email protected]
Pages 231-236 | Published online: 01 Apr 2019

  • Amstutz H C, Ebramzadeh E, Sarkany A, Le Duff M, Rude R. Preservation of bone mineral density of the proximal femur following hemisurface arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2004; 27(12): 1266–71.
  • Aqil A, Drabu R, Bergmann J H, Masjedi M, Manning V, Andrews B, Muirhead-Allwood S K, Cobb J P. The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study. Int Orthop 2013; 37(5): 795–801.
  • Bisseling P, Smolders J M, Hol A, van Susante J L. Metal ion levels and functional results following resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus conventional small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a 3 to 5 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(1): 61–7.
  • Bolognesi M P, Ledford C K. Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: patient evaluation and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 23(12): 724–31.
  • Burroughs B R, Hallstrom B, Golladay G J, Hoeffel D, Harris W H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(1): 11–19.
  • Daniel J, Pynsent P B, McMinn D J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(2): 177–84.
  • Gerhardt D M, Smolders J M, Rijnders T A, Hol A, van Susante J L. Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to five years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(2): 308–14.
  • Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Jin Z. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006; 220(2): 95–105.
  • Haddad F S, Konan S, Tahmassebi J. A prospective comparative study of cementless total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years: a ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(5): 617–22.
  • Heilpern G N, Shah N N, Fordyce M J. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(9): 1137–42.
  • Langton D J, Jameson S S, Joyce T J, Hallab N J, Natu S, Nargol A V. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(1): 38–46.
  • Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli P A. The John Charnley Award: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(2): 326–36.
  • Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture 2000; 11(1): 46–53.
  • Mont M A, Seyler T M, Ragland P S, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(1): 100–8.
  • Petersen M K, Andersen N T, Mogensen P, Voight M, Soballe K. Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 2011; 35(5): 667–74.
  • Pollard T C, Baker R P, Eastaugh-Waring S J, Bannister G C. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(5): 592–600.
  • Smith A J, Dieppe P, Howard P W, Blom A W, National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 380(9855): 1759–66.
  • Smolders J M, Hol A, Rijnders T, van Susante J L. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: a prospective randomised controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Randomized Controlled Trial] 2010; 92(11): 1509–14.
  • Van Susante J L C, Verdonschot N, Bom L P A, Tomaszewski P, Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Schreurs B W. Lessons learnt from early failure of a patient trial with a polymer-on-polymer resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(1): 59–65.
  • Wiik A, Tankard S, Carten R, Lewis A, Amis A, Cobb J. An instrumented treadmill enables measurement of gait at high speeds, suggesting hip resurfacing almost matches normal controls, while hip replacement does not. In: ORS Annu Meet 2012. (Unpublished data)

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.