1,667
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Uncemented monoblock trabecular metal posterior stabilized high-flex total knee arthroplasty: similar pattern of migration to the cruciate-retaining design — a prospective radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical evaluation of 40 patients (49 knees) 60 years or younger with 9 years’ follow-up

, , &

  • Behery O A, Kearns S M, Rabonowitz J M, Levine B R. Cementless vs cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1510–15.
  • Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger J M, Kuster M S. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 430–6.
  • Bellemans J. Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty: the influence of component coating type in sheep. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; (Suppl. 288): 1–35.
  • Bercik M J, Joshi A, Parvizi J. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty – a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 439–44.
  • Bullens H J, Screader H W B, de Waal Malefijt M C, Verdonschot N, Buma P. The presence of periosteum is essential for the healing of large diaphyseal segmental defects reconstructed with trabecular metal: a study in the femur of goats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92: 24–31.
  • Catani F, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cucca G, Bragonzoni L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Giannini S. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 775–82.
  • Comfort T, Baste V, Froufe M A, Namba R, Bordini B, Robertsson O, Cafri G, Paxton E, Sedrakyan A, Graves S. International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (Suppl. (E)): 65–72.
  • Fernandez-Fairen M, Hernández-Vaquero D, Murcia A, Llopis R. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3543–53.
  • Hanzlik J A, Day J S, et al. Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 922–7.
  • Hayakawa K, Date H, Tsujimura S, Nojiri S, Yamada H, Nakagawa K. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component. The Knee 2014; 21: 199–203.
  • Henricson A, Nilsson K G. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years: an RSA study on 33 patients less than 60 years of age. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 504–10.
  • Jacobs W C H, Clement D, Wymenga A. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. A systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 757–68.
  • Jiang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Bian Y, Feng B, Weng X. Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(1): e0147865.
  • Kamath A F, Lee G-C, Sheth N P, Nelson C L, Garino J P, Israelite C L. Prospective results of tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(8): 1390–4.
  • Levine B R, Sporer S, Poggie R A, Della Valle C J, Jacobs J J. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006; 7: 4671–81.
  • Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22: 556–64.
  • Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Ikebuchi M, Iwaki H, Inori F, Nakamura H. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years: a matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1760–4.
  • Molt M, Ryd L, Toksvig-Larsen S. A randomized RSA study concentrating especially on continuous migration. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 262–7.
  • Nilsson K G, Kärrhom J, Ekelund L, Magnusson P. Evaluation of micromotion in cemented vs. uncemented knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: randomized study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6: 265–78.
  • Nilsson K G, Henricson A, Norgren B, Dalén T. Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2006; 448: 129–38.
  • Parratte S, Ollivier M, Opsomer G, Lunebourg A, Argenson J N, Thienpont E. Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases. Orthop Traum Surg Res 2015; 101: 547–52.
  • Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Kaptein B L, Fiocco M, Nelissen R G H H. The beneficial effect of hydroxyapatite lasts: a randomized radiostereometric trial comparing hydroxyapatite-coated, uncoated, and cemented tibial components for up to 16 years. Acta Orthop 2012a; 83: 135–41.
  • Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, Nelissen R G H H. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision; a systemic review and meta-analysis of 21 000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012b; 83: 614–24.
  • Pijls B G, Plevier J W M, Nelissen R G H H. RSA migration of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 320–8.
  • Putman S, Argenson J N, Bonnevialle P, Ehlinger M, Vie P, Leclercq S, Bizot P, Lustig S, Parratte S, Ramdane N, Comar N. Ten-year survival and complications of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to trauma or surgery: a French multicenter study of 263 patients. Orthop Trauma Surg Res 2018; 104: 161–4.
  • Rahbek O, Kold S, Zippor B, Overgaard S, Soballe K. Particle migration and gap healing around trabecular metal implants. Int Orthop 2005; 29: 368–74.
  • Ranstam J, Ryd L, Önsten I. Accurate accuracy measurement: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 106–8.
  • Ritter M A, Davis K E, Farris A, Keating E M, Faris P M. The surgeon’s role in relative success of PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2014; 10: 107–15.
  • Ryd L. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. Act Orthop Scand 1986; (Suppl. 220): 1–80.
  • Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 377–83.
  • Sagomonyants K B, Hakim-Zargar M, Jhaveri A, Aronow A S, Gronowicz G. Porous tantalum stimulates the proliferation and osteogenesis of osteoblasts from elderly female patients. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 609–16.
  • Sambaziotis C, Lovy A J, Koller K E, Bloebaum R D, Hirsh D M, Kim S J. Histologic retrieval analysis of a porous tantalum metal implant in an infected primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1413e5–1413e9.
  • Schildhauer T A, Ribie B, Muhr G, Köller M. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20: 476–84.
  • Scott C E H, Davidson E, MacDonald D J, White T O, Keating J F. Total knee arthroplasty following tibial plateau fracture: a matched cohort study. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 532–8.
  • van Hamersveld K T, Marang-van de Mheen P J, Tsonaka R, Valstar E R, Toksvig-Larsen S. Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated versus cemented total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 1467–76.
  • van Hamersveld K T, Marang-van de Mhen P J, Nelissen R G H H, Toksvig-Larsen S. Peri-apatite coating decreases uncemented tibial component migration: long-term RSA results of a randomized controlled trial and limitations of short-term results. Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 425–30.
  • Vertullo C J, Lewis P L, Lorimer M, Graves S E. The effect of long-term survivorship of surgeon preference for posterior-stabilized or minimally stabilized total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 1129–39.
  • Watters T S, Zhen Y, Martin J R, Levy D L, Jennings J M, Dennis D A. Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: not just a routine primary arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 185–9.
  • Wilson D A J, Richardson G, Hennigar A W, Dunbar M J. Continued stabilization of trabecular metal tibial monoblock total knee arthroplasty components at 5 years: measured with radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 36–40.
  • Zandee van Rilland E, Varcadipane J, Geling O, Murai Kuba M, Nakasone C. A minimum 2-year follow-up using modular trabecular metal tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Reconstructive Rev 2015; 5(3): 23–8.
  • Zardiackas L D, Parsell D E, Dillon L D, Mitchell D W, Nunnery L A, Poggie R. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 180–7.
  • Zhang Y, Ahn P B, Fitzpatrick D C, Heiner A D, Poggie R A, Brown T D.Interfacial frictional behaviour: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial. J Musculoskel Res 1999; 3:245–251.