1,426
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Has the threshold for revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris changed in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? A cohort study of 239 patients using an adapted risk-stratification algorithm

, , , , &

  • Berber R, Skinner J, Board T, Kendoff D, Eskelinen A, Kwon Y M, Padgett D E, Hart A, ISCCoMh. International metal-on-metal multidisciplinary teams: do we manage patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in the same way? An analysis from the International Specialist Centre Collaboration on MOM Hips (ISCCoMH). Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (2): 179–86.
  • De Smet K A, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulos G. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42 (2): 259–69, ix.
  • FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Medical Devices. Metal-on-metal hip implants. Information for orthopaedic surgeons; 2013. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241667.htm.
  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon Y M, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard D J, Murray D W, Gill H S. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (8): 1019–24.
  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gill H S, Murray D W. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (8): 1072–8.
  • Hart A J, Sabah S A, Bandi A S, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson B, A Skinner J. Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (10): 1308–13.
  • Hussey D K, Madanat R, Donahue G S, Rolfson O, Bragdon C R, Muratoglu O K, Malchau H. Scoring the current risk stratification guidelines in follow-up evaluation of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a proposal for a metal-on-metal risk score supporting clinical decision-making. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (22): 1905–12.
  • Kwon Y M, Lombardi A V, Jacobs J J, Fehring T K, Lewis C G, Cabanela M E. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (1): e4.
  • Langton D J, Jameson S S, Joyce T J, Gandhi J N, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol A V. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (8): 1011–16.
  • Liddle A D, Satchithananda K, Henckel J, Sabah S A, Vipulendran K V, Lewis A, Skinner J A, Mitchell A W, Hart A J. Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in a tertiary center: a prospective study of 39 hips with between 1 and 4 years of follow-up. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (3): 237–45.
  • Matharu G S, Pynsent P B, Sumathi V P, Mittal S, Buckley C D, Dunlop D J, Revell P A, Revell M P. Predictors of time to revision and clinical outcomes following revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (12): 1600–9.
  • Matharu G S, Berryman F, Brash L, Pynsent P B, Dunlop D J, Treacy R B. Can blood metal ion levels be used to identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings who are at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris? Bone Joint J 2016a; 98-B (11): 1455–62.
  • Matharu G S, Berryman F, Brash L, Pynsent P B, Treacy R B, Dunlop D J. the effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016b; 98 (8): 617–26.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip resurfacing revision: a cohort study into the second decade after the operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016c; 98 (17): 1444–52.
  • Matharu G S, Berryman F, Judge A, Reito A, McConnell J, Lainiala O, Young S, Eskelinen A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Blood metal ion thresholds to identify patients with metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: an external multicenter validation study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017a; 99 (18): 1532–39.
  • Matharu G S, Nandra R S, Berryman F, Judge A, Pynsent P B, Dunlop D J. Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Bone Joint J 2017b; 99-B (5): 592–600.
  • Matharu G S, Eskelinen A, Judge A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris. Acta Orthop 2018a; 89 (3): 278–88.
  • Matharu G S, Hunt L P, Murray D W, Howard P, Pandit H G, Blom A W, Bolland B, Judge A. Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? An interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2018b; 100-B (1): 33–41.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified? BMJ 2018c; 360: k566.
  • Matharu G S, Berryman F, Dunlop D J, Revell M P, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. No threshold exists for recommending revision surgery in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients with adverse reactions to metal debris: a retrospective cohort study of 346 revisions. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (7): 1483–1491.
  • MHRA. Medical device alert: MDA/2017/018: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements—updated advice for follow-up of patients; June 29, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/drug-device-alerts/all-metal-on-metal-mom-hip-replacements-updated-advice-for-follow-up-of-patients.
  • MHRA. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Medical Device Alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. MDA/2012/036; 2012. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/.
  • Murray D W, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D J, Carr A J, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (8): 1010–4.
  • Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons C L, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill H S, Murray D W. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (7): 847–51.
  • Pritchett J W. One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (1): 219–24.
  • Smith A J, Dieppe P, Howard P W, Blom A W, National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2012a; 380 (9855): 1759–66.
  • Smith A J, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom A W, National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012b; 379 (9822): 1199–204.
  • Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill H S, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet K A. The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (2): 377–85.