1,966
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

All-polyethylene versus metal-backed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: similar 2-year results of a randomized radiostereometric analysis study

, , , &

  • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Fifth AJRR Annual Report on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Data, 2018. Retrieved from http://ajrr.net/images/annual_reports/AAOS-AJRR-2018-Annual-Report-final.pdf?hsCtaTracking=c794b145-8b50-405a-af5c-666a0841a730%7C6996bb53-5b74-4d65-bb51-b24f37c55c9d. Accessed February 8, 2019.
  • Adalberth G, Nilsson K G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Milbrink J. Low-conforming all-polyethylene tibial component not inferior to metal-backed component in cemented total knee arthroplasty: prospective, randomized radiostereometric analysis study of the AGC total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(6): 783–92.
  • Adalberth G, Nilsson K G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Milbrink J. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised RSA study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83(6): 825–31.
  • Banks S A, Harman M K, Hodge W A. Mechanism of anterior impingement damage in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A(Suppl. 2): 37–42.
  • Bartel D L, Burstein A H, Santavicca E A, Insall J N. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64(7): 1026–33.
  • Browne J A, Gall Sims S E, Giuseffi S A, Trousdale R T. All-polyethylene tibial components in modern total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19(9): 527–35.
  • Chambers M C, El-Othmani M M, Sayeed Z, Anoushiravani A, Schnur A K, Mihalko W M, Saleh K J. Economics of all-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial prosthesis designs. Orthopedics 2016; 39(3 Suppl.): S61–S6.
  • Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(5): 589–95.
  • Cheng T, Pan X, Liu T, Zhang X. Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20(8): 1438–49.
  • D’Lima D D, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida J C, Mahar A, Colwell C W Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 213–20.
  • De Carvalho B R, Yassaie O S, Muir D C. Modular versus all-polyethylene tibial components: comparison of pre- and early post-operative patient scores in total knee replacement. ANZ J Surg 2013; 83(10): 784–7.
  • Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Online LROI annual report 2018. Retrieved from http://www.lroi-rapportage.nl/media/pdf/PDF%20Online_LROI_annual_report_2018.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2019.
  • Garling E H, Valstar E R, Nelissen R G. Comparison of micromotion in mobile bearing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a randomized RSA study of 40 knees followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(3): 353–61.
  • Gioe T J, Maheshwari A V. The all-polyethylene tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(2): 478–87.
  • Gudnason A, Adalberth G, Nilsson K G, Hailer N P. Tibial component rotation around the transverse axis measured by radiostereometry predicts aseptic loosening better than maximal total point motion. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(3): 282–7.
  • Gustke K A, Gelbke M K. All-polyethylene tibial component use for elderly, low-demand total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(8), 2421–6.
  • Hyldahl H, Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Weidenhielm L. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components, Part 2: Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(6): 778–84.
  • ISO16087:2013(E). Implants for surgery: Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for the assessment of migration of orthopaedic implants. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.
  • Kaptein B L, Valstar E R, Stoel B C, Rozing P M, Reiber J H. A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem. J Biomech 2005; 38(11): 2330–4.
  • Longo U G, Ciuffreda M, D’Andrea V, Mannering N, Locher J, Denaro V. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25(11): 3620–36.
  • Molt M, Toksvig-Larsen S. Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlon TKA: a prospective randomised RSA trial. Knee 2014; 21(5): 949–54.
  • Norgren B, Dalen T, Nilsson K G. All-poly tibial component better than metal-backed: a randomized RSA study. Knee 2004; 11(3): 189–96.
  • Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures: 2018 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/Rapporter/Report2018_english.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2019.
  • Nouta K A, Pijls B G, Nelissen R G. All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 2012a; 36(3): 565–70.
  • Nouta K A, Verra W C, Pijls B G, Schoones J W, Nelissen R G. All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012b; 470(12): 3549–59.
  • Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, Nelissen R G. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 614–24.
  • Ranstam J, Turkiewicz A, Boonen S, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Wardlaw D. Alternative analyses for handling incomplete follow-up in the intention-to-treat analysis: the randomized controlled trial of balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE). BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 35.
  • Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77(3): 377–83.
  • Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR). Annual Report 2018. Retrieved from http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2018_Eng_1.0.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2019.
  • Steinberg D R, Steinberg M E. The early history of arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 374: 55–89.
  • Stryker. Triathlon All-Polyethylene Tibial Component Surgical Protocol Addendum, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.bizwan.com/_mydoc/stryker/Knee/020%20Triathlon%20All-Polyethylene%20Tibial%20Component%20Surgical%20Protocol%20Addendum.pdf. Accessed May 6, 2019.
  • Valstar E R, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(4): 563–72.
  • Van Hamersveld K T, Marang-Van De Mheen P J, Nelissen R, Toksvig-Larsen S. Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(4): 412–7.
  • Voss B, El-Othmani M M, Schnur A K, Botchway A, Mihalko W M, Saleh K J. A meta-analysis comparing all-polyethylene tibial component to metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: assessing survivorship and functional outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(11): 2628–36.