Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 91, 2020 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
2,740
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Knee

The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Swedish patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a validation study with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) as comparator

Siri HeijbelDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Josefine E NailiDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm;
,
Axel HedinDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm;
,
Annette W-DahlLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Lund; ;The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register;
,
Kjell G NilssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopedics, Umeå University, Umeå;
&
Margareta HedströmDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; ;Reconstructive Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
Pages 88-93 | Published online: 12 Nov 2019

  • Baumann F, Ernstberger T, Loibl M, Zeman F, Nerlich M, Tibesku C. Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136(2): 257–64.
  • Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger J M, Kuster M S. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(3): 430–6.
  • Cao S, Liu N, Han W, Zi Y, Peng F, Li L, Fu Q, Chen Y, Zheng W, Qian Q. Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Orthop Surg Res 2017; 12(1): 6.
  • Dawson B, Trapp R G. summarizing data & presenting data in tables & graphs. In: Basic & clinical biostatistics, 4th ed., Chapter 3. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
  • Hamilton D F, Loth F L, Giesinger J M, Giesinger K, MacDonald D J, Patton J T, Simpson A H R W, Howie C R. Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(2): 218–24.
  • Koo T L, Li M Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15(2): 155–63.
  • Larsson A, Rolfson O, Karrholm J. Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard. Acta Orthop 2019; 90(3): 253–57.
  • Loth F L, Liebensteiner M C, Giesinger J M, Giesinger K, Bliem H R, Holzner B. What makes patients aware of their artificial knee joint? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19(1): 5.
  • Nemes S, Rolfson O, W-Dahl A, Garellick G, Sundberg M, Karrholm J, et al. Historical view and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 426–31.
  • Robinson P G, Rankin C S, Lavery J, Anthony I, Blyth M, Jones B. The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score. J Orthop 2018; 15(2): 480–5.
  • Rolfson O, Eresian Chenok K, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Denissen G, Dunn J, Lyman S, Franklin P, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Dawson J; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(eSuppl 362): 3–8.
  • Roos E M, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 17.
  • Roos E M, Roos H P, Lohmander L S, Ekdahl C, Beynnon B D. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28(2): 88–96.
  • Shadid M B, Vinken N S, Marting L N, Wolterbeek N. The Dutch version of the Forgotten Joint Score: test–retesting reliability and validation. Acta Orthop Belg 2016; 82(1): 112–8
  • SKAR. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report; 2018. ISBN 978-91-88017-20-8
  • Terwee C B, Bot S D, de Boer M R, van der Windt D A, Knol D L, Dekker J, Bouter L M, de Vet H C W. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1): 34–42.
  • Thienpont E, Vanden Berghe A, Schwab P E, Forthomme J P, Cornu O. Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the “Forgotten Joint” Score before and after joint replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(10): 3346–51.
  • Thompson S M, Salmon L J, Webb J M, Pinczewski L A, Roe J P. Construct validity and test re-test reliability of the Forgotten Joint Score. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(11): 1902–5.
  • Thomsen M G, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod K W, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(3): 280–5.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8(2): 94–104.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.