1,023
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Patient-reported outcome after dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasties: a cross-sectional study derived from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register

, &

  • Abdel M P, Cross M B, Yasen A T, Haddad F S. The functional and financial impact of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-b(8): 1046–9.
  • Beaton D E, Boers M, Wells G A. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14(2): 109–14.
  • Berstock J R, Blom A W, Beswick A D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications following the posterior and lateral surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl [Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Government Review] 2015; 97(1): 11–16.
  • Brennan S A, Khan F, Kiernan C, Queally J M, McQuillan J, Gormley I C, O’Byrne J M. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty and the risk of redislocation. Hip Int 2012; 22(5): 500–4.
  • Brooks P J. Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-b(11 Suppl. A): 67–9.
  • Devlin N J, Shah K K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 2018; 27(1): 7–22.
  • DHR. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register—Annual Report. Available from: “http://danskhoftealloplastikregisterdk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DHR-årsrapport-2019_til-offentliggørelsepdf 2019.
  • Edmunds C T, Boscainos P J. Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris Hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test: a retrospective analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9(3): 124–9.
  • Enocson A, Pettersson H, Ponzer S, Tornkvist H, Dalen N, Tidermark J. Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up. Qual Life Res 2009; 18(9): 1177–84.
  • EuroQol G. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199–208.
  • Forsythe M E, Whitehouse S L, Dick J, Crawford R W. Functional outcomes after nonrecurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(2): 227–30.
  • Greene M E, Rolfson O, Gordon M, Garellick G, Nemes S. Standard comorbidity measures do not predict patient-reported outcomes 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3370–9.
  • Hermansen L L, Haubro M H, Viberg B L, Overgaard S. Patient-reported outcome after hip dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty is virtually unknown: a systematic literature review. Acta Orthop 2018: 89(6): 595–6.
  • Hermansen L L, Viberg B, Hansen L, Overgaard S. “True” cumulative incidence of and risk factors for hip dislocation within 2 years after primary total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis: a nationwide population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021a; 103(4): 295–302
  • Hermansen L L, Viberg B, Overgaard S. Development of a diagnostic algorithm identifying cases of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty-based on 31,762 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2021b: 92(2): 137–42.
  • Hutchings A, Grosse Frie K, Neuburger J, van der Meulen J, Black N. Late response to patient-reported outcome questionnaires after surgery was associated with worse outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66(2): 218–25.
  • Kotwal R S, Ganapathi M, John A, Maheson M, Jones S A. Outcome of treatment for dislocation after primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(3): 321–6.
  • Kwon M S, Kuskowski M, Mulhall K J, Macaulay W, Brown T E, Saleh K J. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 447: 34–8.
  • Lyman S, Lee Y Y, McLawhorn A S, Islam W, MacLean C H. What Are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476(12): 2432–41.
  • Nilsdotter A K, Lohmander L S, Klassbo M, Roos E M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC 2003; 4:10.
  • Paulsen A, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S, Roos E M. Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcome measures in a registry setting. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(4): 321–7.
  • Paulsen A, Roos E M, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(1): 39–48.
  • Pedersen A, Johnsen S, Overgaard S, Soballe K, Sorensen H T, Lucht U. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75(4): 434–41.
  • Quan H, Li B, Couris C M, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel J M, Sundararajan V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173(6): 676–82.
  • Ranstam J, Robertsson O. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 10–14.
  • Schmidt M, Schmidt S A, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449–90.CLEP.S91125.
  • Stroh D A, Issa K, Johnson A J, Delanois R E, Mont M A. Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(8): 1415–20.
  • Unit CE. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Questionnaire for patients who have had hip surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009.