7,376
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prosthesis survival after revision knee arthroplasty for “pain without loosening” versus “aseptic loosening”: a Danish nationwide study

, , &

  • Klug A, Gramlich Y, Rudert M, Drees P, Hoffmann R, Weißenberger M, et al. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020: 1–12.
  • Baker P N, van der Meulen J H, Lewsey J, Gregg P J. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(7): 893–900.
  • Reichel F, Innmann M, Gotterbarm T, Schiltenwolf M, Merle C. [Predictors for persistent pain and dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty]. Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) 2019; 33(3): 185–90.
  • Wylde V, Beswick A, Bruce J, Blom A, Howells N, Gooberman-Hill R. Chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3(8): 461–70.
  • Lewis G N, Rice D A, McNair P J, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114(4): 551–61.
  • Petersen K K, Simonsen O, Laursen M B, Nielsen T A, Rasmussen S, Arendt-Nielsen L. Chronic postoperative pain after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin J Pain 2015; 31(1): 1–6.
  • Vince K G. The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-b(11 Supple A): 105–11.
  • Klasan A, Magill P, Frampton C, Zhu M, Young S W. Factors predicting repeat revision and outcome after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29(2): 579–85.
  • Chalmers B P, Pallante G D, Sierra R J, Lewallen D G, Pagnano M W, Trousdale R T. Contemporary revision total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: 1 in 3 risk of re-revision by 10 years. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(7s): S266–s70.
  • Postler A, Lützner C, Beyer F, Tille E, Lützner J. Analysis of total knee arthroplasty revision causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19(1): 55.
  • Belt M, Hannink G, Smolders J, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Schreurs B W, Smulders K. Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2021: 1–5.
  • Price A J, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz J N, Hooper G, Gray A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018; 392(10158): 1672–82.
  • Pedersen A B, Mehnert F, Odgaard A, Schrøder H M. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 125–35.
  • DKR. The Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2020; 2020.
  • Schmidt M, Schmidt S A, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449–90.
  • Lynge E, Sandegaard J L, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39(7 Suppl.): 30–3.
  • AONJRR. AOANJRR Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2009.
  • Quan H, Bing Li B, Couris C M, Fushimi K, Graham P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173(6): 676–82.