1,431
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Who is in the castle?’ One man’s use of the Frankenstein story in art therapy

Pages 53-61 | Received 03 Jan 2016, Accepted 22 Jul 2017, Published online: 07 Aug 2017

References

  • Adams, W. (2001). Making daemons of death and love: Frankenstein, existentialism, psychoanalysis. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 4, 157–188.
  • Ballon, B., & Leszcz, M. (2007). Horror films: Tales to master terror or shapers of trauma? American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(2), 211–230.
  • Bettelheim, B. (1976). Uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairytales. Reprinted 1991. London: Penguin Books.
  • Blackman, N. (2003). Loss and learning disability. Bath: Worth Publishing.
  • Bragge, A., & Fenner, P. (2009). The emergence of the ‘interactive square’ as an approach to art therapy with children on the autistic spectrum. International Journal of Art Therapy, 14(1), 17–28. doi: 10.1080/17454830903006323
  • Brockman, R. (2010). Freud, Frankenstein and the art of loss. Psychoanalytic Review, 97(5), 819–833. doi: 10.1521/prev.2010.97.5.819
  • Caven, J. (2005). An exploration of the use of popular iconic imagery in the art work of adults with learning disabilities in art therapy sessions. Unpublished Mres.
  • Caven, J. (2012). Having a learning disability: The question of what to say and how to say it. In S. Bull & K. O’Farrell (Eds.), Art therapy and learning disabilities: Don’t guess my happiness (pp. 39–52). London: Routledge.
  • Damarell, B., & Paisley, D. (2008). Growing up can be so hard to do: The role of art therapy during crucial life transitions and change in the lives of children with learning disabilities. In T. Dally & C. Case (Eds.), Art therapy with children: From infancy to adolescence (pp. 39–156). London: Routledge.
  • Dent-Brown, K. (2001). Story as therapeutic tool: The six-part story method. Context, 55, 22–23. Retrieved from https://www.dent-brown.co.uk/Context%202001
  • Gersie, A. (1997). Reflections on therapeutic storymaking: The use of stories in groups. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Gilroy, A. (2006). Chapter 5 ‘The methodological debate’ and chapter 6 ‘generating the evidence through qualitative research’. In Art therapy, research And evidence-based practice (pp. 79–111). London: Sage.
  • Gold, S. (1985). Frankenstein and other monsters: An examination of the concepts of destructive narcissism, and perverse relationships between parts of the self as seen in the gothic novel. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12(1), Feb, 101–108.
  • Greenwood, H., Leach, C., Lucock, M., & Noble, R. (2007). The process of long-term art therapy: A case study combining art work and clinical outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 17(5), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/10503300701227550
  • Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (2016). Frankenstein at a glance. Retrieved from https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/f/frankenstein/frankenstein-at-a-glance
  • Kuczaj, E. (1998). Learning to say ‘goodbye’: Loss and bereavement in learning difficulties and the role of art therapy. In M. Rees (Ed.), Drawing on difference: Art therapy with people with learning difficulties (pp. 150–166). London: Routledge.
  • Mathelin-Vanier, C. (2008). Fears and phobias in child analysis. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 7, 176–184. doi: 10.1080/15289160802347890
  • Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An Introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Schaverien, J. (1996). The retrospective review of pictures: Data for researching in art therapy. In H. Payne (Ed.), Second impression. Handbook of inquiry in arts therapies, one river, many currents (pp. 91–103). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Shelley, M. (1818). Frankenstein (2003 ed.). London : Penguin Books.
  • Sinason, V. (1992). Mental handicap and the human condition. London: Free Association Books.
  • Stack, M. (1996). Humpty dumpty had a great fall. Inscape, 1(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/17454839608413020
  • Tipple, R. (1993). Challenging assumptions, Inscape. Summer 2–9.
  • University of Huddersfield. Quality checks and reflexivity. Retrieved from http://www.hud.ac.uk/hhs/research/template-analysis/technique/quality-and-reflexivity/
  • Vassar, M., & Holzmann, M. (2013). The retrospective chart review: Important methodological considerations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 10, article number 12. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3853868/
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1967). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In D.W. Winnicott (Ed.), Playing and reality (pp. 86–94). London: Routledge.
  • Zimmerman, L. (2003). Frankenstein, invisibility, and nameless dread. American Imago, Summer, 60(2), 135–158. doi: 10.1353/aim.2003.0016

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.