Research Note: Partisan Priming and Subjective Evaluations of the Economy: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

References

• Anderson, Christopher J. 2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 271–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.050806.155344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., Silvia M. Mendes, Yuliya V. Tverdova, and Haklin Kim. 2004. “Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election.” Electoral Studies 23: 683–708. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, Marc Meredith, and Erik Snowberg. 2013. “Asking about Numbers: Why and How.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 48–69. doi: 10.1093/pan/mps031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 194–230. doi: 10.2307/2111700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, Mark N. Franklin, Froukje Demant, and Wouter van der Brug. 2007. “The Endogenous Economy: ‘Real’ Economic Conditions, Subjective Economic Evaluations and Government Support.” Acta Politica 42: 1–22. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and Robert Andersen. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 68: 194–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and Mark Pickup. 2010. “Reversing the Causal Arrow.” Journal of Politics 72: 1236–1251. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan, and Gregory Huber. 2009. “Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 407–426. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409990098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213–236. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350050305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., and D. Alwin. 1987. “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (2): 201–219. doi: 10.1086/269029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by Peter Marsden and James Wright, 2nd ed., 263–313. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner Matthew, and Christopher Wlezien. 2007. “Partisan Preferences, Electoral Prospects, and Economic Expectations.” Comparative Political Studies 40: 571–596. doi: 10.1177/0010414005285758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard, David Sears, and Tom Jessor. 1990. “Fact or Artifact Revisited: Survey Instrument Effects and Pocketbook Politics.” Political Behaviour 12 (3): 217–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00992334
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1985. “Pocketbook Voting in U.S. National Election Studies: Fact or Artifact? American.” Journal of Political Science 29: 348–356. doi: 10.2307/2111171
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and M. Fraile. 2010. “Economic voting in Spain: A 2000 panel test.” Electoral Studies 29 (2): 210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., R. Nadeau, and A. Elias. 2008. “Economics, party, and the vote: Causality issues and panel data.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 84–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., D. Roderick Kiewiet, and Nicholas Martini. 2013. “The Nature of Economic Perceptions in Mass Publics.” Electoral Studies 32 (3): 524–528. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2007. “Economic Models of the Vote.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 518–537. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2013. “The VP-Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years.” Public Choice 157: 367–385. doi: 10.1007/s11127-013-0086-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard S., Michael Lewis-Beck, and Éric Bélanger. 2013. “Economics and elections revisited.” Comparative Political Studies, 46 (5): 551–573. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Harvey, and Raymond Duch. 2001. “Do Surveys Provide Representative or Whimsical Assessments of the Economy?” Political Analysis 9 (1): 58–77. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004865
   Google Scholar
• Pickup, Mark, and Geoffrey Evans. 2013. “Addressing the Endogeneity of Economic Evaluations in Models of Political Choice.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (3): 735–754. doi: 10.1093/poq/nft028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., and S. Presser. 1996. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., and R. R. Lau. 1983. “Inducing Apparently Self-interested Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 223–252. doi: 10.2307/2111016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W. 1988. “Context Effects in the General Social Survey.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman, 57–72. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, Patrick, Martin Choo, and Patten Smith. 2009. “Response Order, Party Choice, and Evaluations of the National Economy: A Survey Experiment.” Survey Research Methods 3 (1): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, Roger, and Norman Bradburn. 2010. “The Psychology of Survey Response.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by Peter Marsden and James Wright, 2nd ed., 263–313. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., and K. A. Rasinski. 1988. “Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement.” Psychology Bulletin 103: 299–314. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Nathaniel T., and Christopher Wlezien. 1993. “The Contamination of Responses to Survey Items: Economic Perceptions and Political Judgments.” Political Analysis 5: 181–213. doi: 10.1093/pan/5.1.181
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher, Mark Franklin, and Daniel Twiggs. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior 19: 7–17. doi: 10.1023/A:1024841605168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar