Connecting Niche Party Vote Change in First- and Second-Order Elections

References

• Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and G. Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Debra Leiter. 2012. “Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1272–1294. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artabe, A., and J. Gardeazabal. 2014. “Strategic Votes and Sincere Counterfactuals.” Political Analysis 22 (2): 243–257. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, Michael M. 2012. “Not Always Second Order: Sub-national Elections, National-Level Vote Intentions, and Volatility Spillovers in a Multilevel Electoral System.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, William D., Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt, and Justin Esarey. 2010. “Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 248–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess, Michael. 2003. The Light-Green Society: Ecology and Technological Modernity in France 1960–2000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole. 2013. New Parties in Old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in 17 Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, Jerôme, and Véronique Jerôme-Speziari. 2000. “The 1998 French Regional Elections: Why So Much Political Instability?” Electoral Studies 19 (2): 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchill, Jon. 2002. The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change Within European Green Parties. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1989. The Personal Vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, John M, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral studies 14 (4): 417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, Cliff, and Richard J. Timpone. 2005. “Explaining Vote Switching Across First- and Second-Order Elections: Evidence from Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (3): 260–281. doi: 10.1177/0010414004272693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtice, John. 1989. “The 1989 European Election: Protest or Green Tide?” Electoral Studies 8 (2): 217–230. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(89)90002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtice, John. 2014. “Messages from the Voters: The 2014 Local and European Elections.” Juncture 21 (1): 77–81. doi: 10.1111/j.2050-5876.2014.00784.x
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. 1994. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc. 2008. “Party Competition and Government Formation in Multi-level Settings: Evidence from Germany.” Government and Opposition 43 (4): 505–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeClair, Edward G. 1999. Politics on the Fringe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Catherine, and Sara B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268. doi: 10.1177/1465116511434788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., W. Van der Brug, M. H. Van Egmond, and C. Van der Eijk. 2011. “Individual and Contextual Variation in EU Issue Voting: The Role of Political Information.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.” The Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011–1029. doi: 10.2307/2131389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., and Mikhail G. Filippov. 2001. “Electoral Balancing in Federal and Sub-national Elections: The Case of Canada.” Constitutional Political Economy 12: 313–331. doi: 10.1023/A:1012529023870
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, on behalf of the Committee of Regions. 2009. “The Role and Impact of Local and Regional Authorities Within the European Union: Opinions on the Different Levels of Public Authorities and Awareness of the Committee of the Regions.” Special Eurobarometer 307/Wave 70.1 – TNS Opinion & Social.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence. 2010. Linking Citizens and Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faas, Thorsten. 2003. “To Defect or Not to Defect? National, Institutional, and Party Group Pressures on MEPS and Their Consequences for Party Group Cohesion in the European Parliament.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (4): 841–866. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrer, Benjamin. 2014. “A Theory of Organizational Choice: Interest Groups and Parties as Substitutable Influence Mechanisms.” Party Politics 20 (4): 632–645. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldhouse, Edward, and David Cutts. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 367–388. doi: 10.1017/S0007123409000726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippov, Mikhail, Peter Ordeshook, and Olga Shvetsova. 2004. Designing Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Robert, Matthew J. Goodwin, and David Cutts. 2012. “Strategic Eurosceptics and Polite Xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51: 204–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Hal Stern. 2005. “The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” Is Not Itself Statistically Significant.” The American Statistician 60 (4): 328–331. doi: 10.1198/000313006X152649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giebler, Heiko, and Andreas M. Wüst. 2011. “Campaigning on an Upper Level? Individual Campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament Elections in Its Determinants.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jane. 2014. “UKIP Support in the European Parliament Election Set to Translate to the 2015 General Election.” British Election Studies Blog. http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-findings/ukip-support-in-the-european-parliament-election-set-to-translate-to-the-2015-general-election/#.VScgl_nF-Ps.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Anthony, Iain Mclean, Bridget Taylor, and John Curtice. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, William. 2002. “Regional Parties and National Politics in Europe: Spain's Estado De Las Autonomias, 1993–2000.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (6): 657–685. doi: 10.1177/0010414002035006002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Ailsa, and Nicola McEwen. 2010. “A Comparative Analysis of Voter Turnout in Regional Elections.” Electoral Studies 29: 405–416. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 688–698. doi: 10.2307/3088408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, and Michael Marsh. 2007. “Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 495–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Jae-Jae Spoon. 2012. “Motivating the European Voter: Parties, Issues and Campaigns in European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (6): 701–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Lisbet, Gary Marks, and Arjan H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies (1950–2006). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jérôme, B., and M. S. Lewis-Beck. 1999. “Is Local Politics Local? French Evidence.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (2): 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Bernhard Wessels. 1999. The European Parliament, National Parliaments, and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kedar, Orit. 2009. Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, and Michael D. McDonald. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, Charles. 2000. The Red-Green Coalition in Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Ron. 2012. “Intra-party Democracy and Party Responsiveness.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1295–1319. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, Sandra. 2014. “How Does Decentralization Affect Electoral Competition of State-Wide Parties? Evidence from Spain.” Party Politics 20 (3): 391–402. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., ed. 2000. How France Votes. New York: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Philip, Richard Whitake, and Gemma Loomes. 2012. “The UK Independence Party: Understanding a Niche Party's Strategy, Candidates, and Supporters.” Parliamentary Affairs 65: 733–757. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsr042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAllister, Iain, Edward Fieldhouse, and Andrew Russell. 2002. “Yellow Fever? The Political Geography of Liberal Voting in Great Britain.” Political Geography 21 (4): 421–447. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00077-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, M., and J. Tenscher, eds. 2004. Campaigning in Europe – Campaigning for Europe. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, Michael. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 591–607. doi: 10.1017/S000712349800026X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie. 2008. Party Competition Between Unequals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mershon, Carol, and Olga Shvetsova. 2013. Party System Change in Legislatures Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Margit, and John Ely, eds. 1998. The German Greens: Paradox Between Movement and Party. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Bernhard Miller. 2015. “The Niche Party Concept and Its Measurement.” Party Politics 21 (2): 259–271. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, Monika. 2012. “National Versus European: Party Control over Members of the European Parliament.” West European Politics 35 (3): 607–631. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.665743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, ed. 1989. New Politics in Western Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Nachmias, D., M. Rosenthal, and H. Zubida. 2012. “Inverted First-and Second-Order Elections: The Effects of Political Alienation on Electoral Turnout in Israel.” Israel Studies Review 27 (1): 31–54. doi: 10.3167/isr.2012.270103
   Google Scholar
• Nay, Olivier. 2001. “Institutions and Representation: How Institutional Rules Shape Political Recruitment in French Regional Elections.” West European Politics 24 (3): 151–172. doi: 10.1080/01402380108425457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, Michael. 1997. Green Parties and Political Change in Contemporary Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, Sergi. 2015. “How Can Mainstream Parties Prevent Niche Party Success? Centre-Right Parties and the Immigration Issue.” Journal of Politics 77 (2): 352–367. doi: 10.1086/680040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, Colin. 2005. “Not All ‘Second-Order’ Contests Are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 584–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00207.x
   Google Scholar
• Reif, Karlheinz, and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Dick, and Chris Rootes, eds. 1996. The Green Challenge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, Chris. 2010. “The Green Breakthrough of 1989: Meaning, Significance and Legacy.” Institute of Contemporary British History, 2012. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/groups/ich/witness/archives/Political/green.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Schakel, Arjan H. 2011. “Congruence Between Regional and National Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (5): 631–662. doi: 10.1177/0010414011424112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, Arjan H. 2013. “Nationalisation of Multilevel Party Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (2): 212–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, Arjan H., and Charlie Jeffery. 2013. “Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections?” Regional Studies 47 (3): 323–341. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.690069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew, and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, Peter, Hanna Wass, and André Blais. 2011. “The Impact of Motivational and Contextual Factors on Turnout in First- and Second-Order Elections.” Electoral Studies 30 (4): 689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2009. “Holding Their Own: Explaining the Persistence of Green Parties in France and the UK.” Party Politics 15: 615–634. doi: 10.1177/1354068809336397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae. 2012. “How Salient Is Europe? An Analysis of European Election Manifestos, 1979–2004.” European Union Politics 13 (4): 558–579. doi: 10.1177/1465116512448123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit. 2006. “Party System Change: Testing a Model of New Party Entry.” Party Politics 12: 99–119. doi: 10.1177/1354068806059346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit. 2010. “The Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Legislative Behavior: The Case of Estonia.” Party Politics 16 (2): 215–235. doi: 10.1177/1354068809341053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 44 (2): 347–361.
   Google Scholar
• Tzelgov, Eitan. 2014. “Cross-cutting Issues, Intraparty Dissent and Party Strategy: The Issue of European Integration in the House of Commons.” European Union Politics 15 (1): 3–23. doi: 10.1177/1465116513509307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, and Jonas Lefevere. 2012. “Has Europe Got Anything to Do with the European Elections? A Study on Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009.” European Union Politics 13 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.1177/1465116511428360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, Wouter, and Cees van der Eijk, eds. 2007. European Elections and Domestic Politics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark Franklin. 2004. “Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe.” In European Integration and Political Conflict, edited by Gary Marks and Marco R. Steenbergen, 33–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Eijk, Cees, Mark Franklin, and Michael Marsh. 1996. “What Voters Teach Us about Europe-Wide Elections: What Europe-Wide Elections Teach Us about Voters.” Electoral Studies 15 (2): 149–166. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(96)00009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kolk, Henk. 2007. “Local Electoral Systems in Western Europe.” Local Government Studies 33 (2): 159–180. doi: 10.1080/03003930701198524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Wardt, Marc. 2015. “Desperate Needs, Desperate Deeds: Why Mainstream Parties Respond to the Issues of Niche Parties.” West European Politics 38 (1): 93–122. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.945247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Marcus. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845–864. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar