More Choice, Higher Turnout? The Impact of Consideration Set Size and Homogeneity on Political Participation

References

• Adams, J., J. Dow, and S. Merrill. 2006. “The Political Consequences of Alienation-Based and Indifference-Based Voter Abstention: Applications to Presidential Elections.” Political Behavior 28 (1): 65–86. doi: 10.1007/s11109-005-9002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, C., E. Sapir, and C. de Vries. 2012. “Parties’ Positions on European Integration: Issue Congruence, Ideology or Context?” West European Politics 35 (6): 1341–1362. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, S., and J. Karp. 2009. “Electoral Systems, Efficacy, and Voter Turnout.” In The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, edited by H.-D. Klingemann, 109–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2006. “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (1): 111–125. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and K. Aarts. 2006. “Electoral Systems and Turnout.” Acta Politica 41 (2): 180–196. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and R. K. Carty. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout.” European Journal of Political Research 18 (2): 167–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and A. Dobrzynska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33 (2): 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, R., and B. Page. 1973. “Indifference, Alienation and Rational Decisions.” Public Choice 15 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01718840
   Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W., C. van der Eijk, and M. Franklin. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, G., and K. Nakamoto. 1989. “Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage.” Journal of Marketing Research 26 (3): 285–298. doi: 10.2307/3172901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. 2003. “When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 170–183. doi: 10.1086/376808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. 2008. “How to Deal with Missing Data Conceptual Overview and Details for Implementing Two Modern Methods.” In Best Practices in Quantitative Methods, edited by J. Osborne, 197–204. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R., J. Thomassen, and M. Rosema. 2012. “European Parliament Elections and Political Representation: Policy Congruence between Voters and Parties.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1226–1248. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, C. W. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. and C. Anderson. 2010. “Citizens, Context, and Choice.” In Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices, edited by R. J. Dalton and C. J. Anderson, 3–32 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., and Y. Dejaeghere. 2014. “Bridging the Ideological Space: A Cross-National Analysis of the Distance of Party Switching.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 580–599. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshazo, J. R., and G. Fermo. 2002. “Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 123–143. doi: 10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W. 1990. “Interest in Politics.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, edited by M. K. Jennings and J. W. van Deth, 275–312. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter and Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W. 2000. “Interesting but Irrelevant: Social Capital and the Saliency of Politics in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (2): 115–147. doi: 10.1023/A:1007088702196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W., and M. Elff. 2000. “Political Involvement and Apathy in Europe 1973–1998.” Working Paper Nr. 33. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Dhar, R. 1997. “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option.” Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2): 215–231. doi: 10.1086/209506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., W. van der Brug, M. Kroh, and M. Franklin. 2006. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 424–447. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., and M. Franklin. 2009. Elections and Voters. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., and B. Niemöller. 1984. “Het potentiele electoraat van de Nederlandse politieke partijen.” Beleid en Maatschappij 11: 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., and E. V. Oppenhuis. 1991. “European Parties’ Performance in Electoral Competition.” European Journal of Political Research 19 (1): 55–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1991.tb01177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N. 2003. “The Dynamics of Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, edited by L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, and P. Norris, 148–168. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, E. A., and D. R. Lehmann. 1995. “Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (2): 186–199. doi: 10.1086/209444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruca, T. 1989. “Determinants of Choice Set Size: An Alternative Method for Measuring Evoked Sets.” Advances in Consumer Research 16 (1): 515–521.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J. R., and B. Wernerfelt. 1990. “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets.” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (4): 393–408. doi: 10.1086/209225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiner, R. A. 1983. “The Origin of Predictable Behavior.” American Economic Review 73 (4): 560–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., P. R. Stopher, and J. Louviere. 2001. “An Exploratory Analysis of the Effect of Numbers of Choice Sets in Designed Choice Experiments: An Airline Choice Application.” Journal of Air Transport Management 7 (6): 373–379. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and M. Marsh. 2011. “Second-Order Effects Plus Pan-European Political Swings: An Analysis of European Parliament Elections Across Time.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., and J.-J. Spoon. 2012. “Motivating the European Voter: Parties, Issues and Campaigns in European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (6): 701–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., and J. Wittroc. 2011. “The Second-Order Election Model Revisited: An Experimental Test of Vote Choices in European Parliament Elections.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., and M. R. Lepper. 2000. “When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6): 995–1006. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, R. W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 405–424. doi: 10.2307/1961959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, R. W., and R. A. Miller. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies 27 (4): 467–492. doi: 10.1177/0010414095027004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou, W. 2011. “Left-Right Orientations and Ideological Voting in New Democracies: A Case Study of Slovenia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (1): 27–47. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.534300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D., and B. Wessels. 2009. “How Voters Cope with the Complexity of Their Political Environment. Differentiation of Political Supply, Effectiveness of Electoral Institutions and the Calculus of Voting.” In The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, edited by Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 237–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B.-K., and W.-N. Lee. 2004. “The Effect of Information Overload on Consumer Choice Quality in an On-line Environment.” Psychology & Marketing 21 (3): 159–183. doi: 10.1002/mar.20000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., and M. D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzotta, M. J., and J. Opaluch. 1995. “Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner's Hypothesis.” Land Economics 71 (4): 500–515. doi: 10.2307/3146714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, P. T., and J. Andrade e Silva. 2009. “Citizens’ Freedom to Choose Representatives: Ballot Structure, Proportionality and ‘Fragmented’ Parliaments.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punj, G., and R. Brookes. 2001. “Decision Constraints and Consideration Set Formation in Consumer Durables.” Psychology and Marketing 18 (8): 843–863. doi: 10.1002/mar.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliff, B., and P. Davis. 2000. “Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 132–141. doi: 10.2307/2669299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. H., and J. M. Lattin. 1991. “Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition.” Journal of Marketing Research 28 (4): 429–440. doi: 10.2307/3172783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. H., and J. M. Lattin. 1997. “Consideration: Review of Research and Prospects for Future Insights.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 406–410. doi: 10.2307/3151902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. H., and P. Nedungadi. 1995. “Studying Consideration in the Consumer Decision Process: Progress and Challenges.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (1): 3–7. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00008-P
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., and B. Wessels. 2005. “Meaningful Choices: Under which Conditions do General Elections Provide a Meaningful Choice Set, and what Happens if they don't?” Stimulus Paper for Module III of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES).
   Google Scholar
• Shocker, A. D., M. Ben-Akiva, B. Boccara, and P. Nedungadi. 1991. “Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice: Issues, Models, and Suggestions.” Marketing Letters 2 (3): 181–197. doi: 10.1007/BF02404071
   Google Scholar
• Simonson, I., and A. Tversky. 1992. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research 29 (3): 281–295. doi: 10.2307/3172740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sio, L., and M. Franklin. 2012. “Strategic Incentives, Issue Proximity and Party Support in Europe.” West European Politics 35 (6): 1363–1385. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, K., and C. van Ham. 2013. “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter-Turnout.” Electoral Studies 32 (2): 344–359.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M. R., and D. Hangartner. 2008. “Political Choice Sets in Multi-Party Elections.” Paper presented at the workshop The Politics of Change, Amsterdam, June 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Swait, J., V. Adamowicz, M. Hanemann, A. Diederich, J. Krosnick, D. Layton, W. Provencher, D. Schkade, and R. Tourangeau. 2002. “Context Dependence and Aggregation in Disaggregate Choice Analysis.” Marketing Letters 13 (3): 195–205. doi: 10.1023/A:1020262503119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, C., and M. Rosema. 2009. Taking Voters’ Consideration Set into Consideration: Modelling Electoral Choice in Two Stages. Paper presented at the 5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, B., and M. Franklin. 2010. “Turning Out or Turning Off: Do Mobilization and Attitudes Account for Turnout Differences between New and Established Member States at the 2004 EP Elections?” In European Parliament Elections after Eastern Enlargement, edited by H. Schmitt, 82–99. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, B., and H. Schmitt. 2008. “Meaningful Choices, Political Supply, and Institutional Effectiveness.” Electoral Studies 27 (1): 19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 2008. “Consideration Sets and Political Choices: A Heterogeneous Model of Vote Choice and Sub-National Party Strength.” Political Behavior 30 (2): 161–183. doi: 10.1007/s11109-007-9045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar