The short-time dynamics of issue ownership and its impact on the vote

References

• Aalberg, T., and A. T. Jenssen. 2007. “Do Television Debates in Multiparty Systems Affect Viewers? A Quasiexperimental Study with First-Time Voters.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (1): 115–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M., and J. Nagler. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 55–96. doi: 10.2307/2991747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, É. 2003. “Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties 1953–2001.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 539–558. doi: 10.1017/S0008423903778755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, É., and B. Meguid. 2008. “Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 477–491. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci, P. 2006. “Tracing the Cognitive and Affective Roots of ‘Party Competence’: Italy and Britain, 2001.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 548–569. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasher, H. 2009. “The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations.” Party Politics 15 (1): 69–92. doi: 10.1177/1354068808097891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W. 2004. “Issue Ownership and Party Choice.” Electoral Studies 23 (2): 209–233. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., and D. Farlie. 1983. Explaining and Oredicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., D. Sanders, M. Stewart, and P. Whiteley. 2004. “Electoral choice in 2001.” In Political Choice in Britain, edited by H. Clarke, D. Sanders, M. Stewart, and P. Whiteley, 79–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. San Diego: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, P. 2014. Partisan Priorities. How Issue Ownership Drives and Disorts American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., W. van der Brug, M. Kroh, and M. Franklin. 1996. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 424–447. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M., and L. De Sio. 2012. “Party Matters: The Surprising Role of Party Characteristics in Conditioning the Bases of Electoral Support in Europe.” Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, August.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, D., S. Nicolet and P. Sciarini. 2014. “ Voters are not Fools, or are they? Party Profile, Political Sophistication and Party Choice.” European Political Science Review 7 (1): 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., and S. Hobolt. 2008. “Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections.” Electoral Studies 27 (3): 460–476. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., and W. Jennings. 2011. “Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Great Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 311–343. doi: 10.1017/S0007123411000330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., and W. Jennings. 2012. “The Dynamics of Issue Competence and Vote for Parties in and out of Power. An Analysis of Valence in Britain, 1979–1997.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (4): 469–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. 2007. “The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe.” Political Studies 55 (3): 607–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2005. “Candidate Qualities Through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 908–923. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., and Wlezien C. 2011. Distinguishing Between Most Important Problems and Issues? Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 545–555. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, R. 2011. “Credit Where It's Due? Valence Politics, Attributions of Responsibility, and Multi-Level Elections.” Political Behavior 33 (1): 53–77. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9116-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., and H. Brady. 2002. “The Rolling Cross-Section Design.” Electoral Studies 21 (2): 283–295. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00022-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K. 2006. “Visualizing Data Across the Campaign.” In Capturing Campaign Dynamics, 2000 and 2004: the National Annenberg Election Survey, edited by D. Romer, K. Kenski, K. Winneg, C. Adasiewicz, and K. Jamieson, 104–120. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., M. Tomz, and J. Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–361. doi: 10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, J., and A. Walter. 2014. “News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level Versus Stability at the Macro Level.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (2): 226–245. doi: 10.1177/1940161213520043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., R. Lachat, S. Bornschier, and M. Helbling. 2005. Der Aufstieg der SVP. Zürich: NZZ Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., and P. Sciarini. 2004. “ The Impact of Issue Preferences on the Voting Choices in the Swiss Federal Elections 1999.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 725–759.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, R. 2011. “Electoral Competitiveness and Issue Voting.” Political Behavior 33 (4): 645–663. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9151-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, R. 2014. “Issue Ownership and the Vote. The Effects of Associative and Competence Ownership on Issue Voting.” Swiss Political Science Review 20 (4), 727–740. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., G. Felder, S. Gerber, and J. Fivaz. 2010. Die Politische Positionierung der Europäischen Parteien im Vergleich. Lausanne: Cahier de l'IDHEAP Nr. 252.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, G. 2012. Eidgenössische Wahlen 2011. Wahlteilnahme und Wahlentscheid. Lausanne: FORS.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsson, J. 2009. Economic Voting and Issue Ownership. An Integrative Approach. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer T., and Mueller, W. 2013. “The Issue Agenda, Party Competence and Popularity: An Empirical Analysis of Austria 1989–2004.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23 (4): 484–500. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.800872
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., A. Blais, E. Gidengil, and N. Nevitte. 2001. “Perceptions of Party Competence in the 1997 Election.” In Party Politics in Canada, edited by H. Thorburn, and A. Whitehorn, 413–430. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolet, S., and P. Sciarini. 2010. Le destin électoral de la gauche: le vote socialiste et vert en Suisse. Chêne-Bourg: Georg.
   Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, S. 2012. “Valence Beyond Consensus. Party Competence and Policy Dispersion From A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 31 (2): 342–352. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850. doi: 10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J., W. Benoit, and G. Hansen. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 599–626. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubager, R., and R. Slothuus. 2013. “What are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level.” Political Behavior 35 (3): 567–588. doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9204-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, A., J. Lefevere, and S. Walgrave. 2013. “‘Steal Me if You Can!’: The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership.” Party Politics 21 (2): 198–208. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varone, F., Engeli, I., Sciarini, P. and Gava, R. 2014. “Agenda-Setting and Direct Democracy: The Rise of the Swiss People's Party.” In Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems. A Comparative Approach, edited by C. Green-Pedersen and S. Walgrave, 105–122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walczak, Agnieszka, and Wouter van der Brug. 2012. “The Electoral Trade-Off: How Issues and Ideology Affect Party Preference Formation in Europe.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 22 (3): 245–268. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2012.692373
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., J. Lefevere, and M. Nuytemans. 2009. “Issue Ownership Stability and Change: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues Through Media Appearances.” Political Communication 26 (2): 153–172. doi: 10.1080/10584600902850718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., J. Lefevere, and A. Tresch. 2012. “The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 771–782. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., J. Lefevere, and A. Tresch. 2014. “The Limits of Issue Ownership Dynamics: The Constraining Effect of Party Preferences.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.811245
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem’.” Electoral Studies 24 (4): 555–579. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar