Voter turnout and district-level competitiveness in mixed-member electoral systems

References

• Blais, Andre, and R. K. Carty. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Turnout?” European Journal of Political Research 18: 167–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 1988. “Closeness and Turnout: A Methodological Note.” Journal of Politics 50: 768–775. doi: 10.2307/2131467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 2015. “Electoral Rules, Mobilization, and Turnout.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 49–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-060414-035915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Erik J. 2012. “The Rise and Decline of Turnout in Congressional Elections: Electoral Institutions, Competition, and Strategic Mobilization.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 373–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico, and Erik S. Herron. 2005. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 16–31. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron, and Misa Nishikawa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and Its Consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, Harold F. 1930. Why Europe Votes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Mark, and Miki Caul. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 1091–1122. doi: 10.1177/0010414000033009001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Peter Selb. 2011. “Turnout and the (Effective) Number of Parties at the National and District Levels: A Puzzle-solving Approach.” Party Politics 17: 93–117. doi: 10.1177/1354068810365506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, Robert W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 81: 405–423. doi: 10.2307/1961959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman, Ken, Allen Hicken, Daniele Caramani, David Backer, and David Lublin. 2014. Constituency-level Elections Archive. Produced and distributed by Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko. 2006. “The General Election in Japan, September 2005.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 621–627. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko. 2008. “Re-examining the Contamination Effect of Japan’s Mixed Electoral System Using the Treatment-effects Model.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 723–731. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko. 2010. “Factors Behind the Historic Defeat of Japans Liberal Democratic Party in 2009.” Asian Survey 50: 888–907. doi: 10.1525/as.2010.50.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert G., and Ethan Scheiner. 2005. “Strategic Ticket Splitting and the Personal Vote in Mixed-member Electoral Systems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 259–276. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert G., and Ethan Scheiner. 2009. “Strategic Voting in Established and New Democracies: Ticket Splitting in Mixed-member Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 28: 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems.” International Political Science Review 18 (3): 297–312. doi: 10.1177/019251297018003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy S. 2014. “Institutional Influences on Turnout in Mixed Member Electoral Systems: An Exploratory Analysis.” Representation 50 (2): 161–175. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2013.860912
   Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy S. 2015. “Duvergers Law in Mixed Legislative Systems: The Impact of National Electoral Rules on District Competition.” European Journal of Political Research 54: 182–196. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera, Pedro. 2013. “Electoral Coordination in Mixed-member Systems: Does the Level of Democratic Experience Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 52: 119–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William, and Peter Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 25–42. doi: 10.1017/S000305540011562X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb, Peter. 2009. “A Deeper Look at the Proportionality-turnout Nexus.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (4): 527–548. doi: 10.1177/0010414008327427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. 2001. Mixed-member Electoral Systems: The Best of the Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel. 2015. “District Magnitude and Electoral Turnout: A Macro-level Global Analysis.” Acta Politica 50 (1): 82–100. doi: 10.1057/ap.2013.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, Peter Selb, and Bernard Grofman. 2014. “How Turnout Depends on the Number of Parties: A Logical Model.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24: 393–413. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.858345
   Google Scholar