Mandates matter: how decisive victories enhance expectations about government performance

References

• Altheas, Scott, Anne Cizmar, and James Gimpel. 2009. “Media Supply, Audience Demand, and the Geography of News Consumption in the United States.” Political Communication 26 (3): 249–277. doi: 10.1080/10584600903053361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher, André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banducci, Susan, Iulia Cioroianu, Travis Coan, Gabriel Katz, and Daniel Stevens. 2018. “Intermedia Agenda Setting in Personalized Campaigns: How News Media Influence the Importance of Leaders.” Electoral Studies 54: 281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, Susan, and Chris Hanretty. 2014. “Comparative Determinants of Horse-race Coverage.” European Political Science Review 6 (4): 621–640. doi: 10.1017/S1755773913000271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, Judith. 2005. “A Question of Trust: Implementing Party Manifestos.” Parliamentary Affairs 58 (3): 585–599. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsi053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason, and Jennifer Jerit. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 226–242. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, Matthew, and Phil Gussin. 2004. “In the Eye of the Beholder: An Experimental Investigation Into the Foundations of the Hostile Media Phenomenon.” Working Paper, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. 2008. “Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-national Analysis.” Electoral Studies 27 (2): 305–320. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, Toby, James Druckman, and Fay Cook. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 235–262. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Phillip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, Dennis, and James Druckman. 2007. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637–655. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, Philip, and Dennis Kavanagh. 2016. The British General Election of 2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan, and Jonas Linde. 2016. “Losing Happily? The Mitigating Effect of Democracy and Quality of Government on the Winner-Loser Gap in Political Support.” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (9): 652–664. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1177831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James. 2001. “On the Limits of Framing Effects. Who Can Frame?” The Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1041–1066. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, and Thomas Leeper. 2012. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 875–896. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, Erik Peterson, and Rune Slothuus. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00124924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, Brad, and Matthew Wilson. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 899–914. doi: 10.2307/2669331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossback, Lawrence, David Peterson, and James Stimson. 2006. Mandate Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Andrew, and Neil Malhotra. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 285–306. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Timothy. 2015. “Forecast Error: The UK General Election.” Significance 12: 10–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00823.x
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, and Robert Klemmensen. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 309–337. doi: 10.1177/0010414006297169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, Cindy, and Marc Trussler. 2017. “At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research: Theory, Specification, and Analysis of Experiments with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.” Political Behavior 39 (4): 789–815. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9379-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernell, Georgia, and Kevin Mullinix. 2018. “Winners, Losers, and Perceptions of Vote (Mis)Counting.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edx021
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon, and Donald Kinder. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming.” The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 497–512. doi: 10.2307/1963531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebo, Matthew, and Daniel Cassino. 2007. “The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval.” Political Psychology 28 (6): 719–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1998. “The Construction of Electoral Mandates: Media Coverage of Election Results in Canada.” Political Communication 15 (2): 239–253. doi: 10.1080/10584609809342368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne, and Jon Krosnick. 2000. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 301–315. doi: 10.2307/2669312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup, Mark, and Sara B. Hobolt. 2015. “The Conditionality of the Trade-off between Government Responsiveness and Effectiveness: The Impact of Minority Status and Polls in the Canadian House of Commons.” Electoral Studies 40: 517–530.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sances, Michael, and Charles Stewart. 2015. “Partisanship and Confidence in the Vote Count: Evidence from U.S. National Elections Since 2000.” Electoral Studies 40: 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, Michal, Jacob Shamir, and Tamir Sheafer. 2008. “The Political Communication of Mandate Elections.” Political Communication 25 (1): 47–66. doi: 10.1080/10584600701807869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles, Jack, Gabriel Katz, and Daniel Stevens. 2017. “Electoral Competitiveness and Turnout in British Elections, 1964-2010.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (4): 775–794. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar