The changing meaning of left and right: supply- and demand-side effects on the perception of party positions

References

• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu. 2011. “Is Anybody Listening? Evidence that Voters do not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 370–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu. 2014. “Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider Information Environment? An Analysis of Mass-Elite Linkages on European Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 967–978. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Christopher Wlezien. 2016. “The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 811–823. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andridge, Rebecca R., and Roderick J. A. Little. 2010. “A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-Response.” International Statistical Review 78 (1): 40–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, Susan, Heiko Giebler, and Sylvia Kritzinger. 2017. “Knowing More from Less: How the Information Environment Increases Knowledge of Party Positions.” British Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 571–588. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason, and Jennifer Jerit. 2009. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy-Specific Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Paul C., Pablo Barberá, Kathrin Ackermann, and Aaron Venetz. 2016. “Is the Left-Right Scale a Valid Measure of Ideology? Individual-Level Variation in Associations with ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ and Left-Right Self-Placement.” Political Behavior, First Online.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. 2015. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, Heinz. 2002. “Who Follows Whom? The Impact of Parties on Media Agenda Formation in the 1997 British General Election Campaign.” Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 7 (3): 34–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis J. Farlie. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and David Robertson. 1987. “Do Parties Differ, and How? Comparative Discriminant Analysis and Factor Analyses.” In Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, edited by Ian Budge, David Robertson, and Derek Hearl, 387–416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, Kathrin B. 2016. “Estimating Parties’ Left-Right Positions: Determinants of Voters’ Perceptions’ Proximity to Party Ideology.” Electoral Studies 41: 159–178. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Royce, and Hiroki Kubo. 2018. “Explaining Citizen Perceptions of Party Ideological Positions: The Mediating Role of Political Contexts.” Electoral Studies 51: 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan. 2009. “Political Parties and Perceptual Agreement: The Influence of Party Related Factors on Voters’ Perceptions in Proportional Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan. 2013. “Does Context Matter: The Impact of Electoral Systems, Political Parties and Individual Characteristics on Voters’ Perceptions of Party Positions.” Electoral Studies 32 (4): 670–683. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., Ian McAllister, and David M. Farrell. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Catherine E., Armen Hakhverdian, and Bram Lancee. 2013. “The Dynamics of Voters’ Left/Right Identification: The Role of Economic and Cultural Attitudes.” Political Science Research and Methods 1 (2): 223–238. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2013.4
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo. 2014. “And Yet It Moves: The Effect of Election Platforms on Party Policy Images.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (14): 1919–1944. doi: 10.1177/0010414013516067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and James Adams. 2015. “How Voters’ Perceptions of Junior Coalition Partners Depend on the Prime Minister’s Position.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (3): 601–621. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2013. “Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 459–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzmann, Simon T. 2014. “Die Wahlprogrammatik der AfD in vergleichender Perspektive.” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Deutsches und Internationales Parteienrecht und Parteienforschung 20: 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2007. “The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe.” Political Studies 55 (3): 607–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Peter B. Mortensen. 2015. “Avoidance and Engagement: Issue Competition in Multiparty Systems.” Political Studies 63 (4): 747–764. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin. 2010. “A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases.” Political Analysis 18 (1): 1–35. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpp034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267–297. doi: 10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1 (1): 73–111. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald. 1984. “The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in Western Society.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, edited by Russell J. Dalton, Scott E. Flanagan, and Paul Allen Beck, 25–69. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1976. “Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left-Right Dimension among Western Mass Publics.” In Party Identification and Beyond, edited by Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, and Dennis Farlie, 234–273. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Inaki Sagarzazu. 2016. “Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention.” West European Politics 39 (2): 380–398. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 1995. “Value Orientations, Political Conflicts and Left-Right Identification: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Political Research 28 (1): 63–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalisation: Six Countries Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performances. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, Marcel, Heiko Giebler, and Aiko Wagner. 2016. “Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland. Eine empirische Einordnung der Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2013 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der AfD.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57 (2): 247–275. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. 2007. “Left-Right Orientations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 206–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, Maxwell. 2004. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, Samuel, III Bernard Grofman, and James Adams. 2001. “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Voter Projections of Party Locations: Evidence from Norway, France, and the USA.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 199–221. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.00594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, Nicolas. 2017. “Gaining Voice in the Mass Media: The Effect of Parties’ Strategies on Party-Issue Linkages in Election News Coverage.” Acta Politica 52 (4): 436–460. doi: 10.1057/s41269-016-0026-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Markus Wagner. 2016. “Issue Engagement in Election Campaigns: The Impact of Electoral Incentives and Organizational Constraints.” Political Science Research and Methods 4 (3): 555–571. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas, and Markus Wagner. 2017. “It Sounds Like they are Moving: Understanding and Modelling Emphasis-Based Policy Change.” Political Science Research and Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/psrm.2017.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Markus Wagner. 2018. “Perceptions of Parties’ Left-Right Positions: The Impact of Salience Strategies.” Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1354068818806679.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850. doi: 10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, Carolina, and Magdalena Staniek. 2017. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Voters’ Perceptions of Party Policy Shifts.” West European Politics 40 (6): 1288–1309. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1309623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattinger, Hans, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Bernhard Weßels, Christof Wolf, Simon Henckel, Ina Bieber, and Philipp Scherer. 2015a. “Langfrist-Online-Tracking, Kumulation 2009–2014, Kernfragen (GLES). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln.” ZA5749 Datenfile Version 1.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.12286.
   Google Scholar
• Rattinger, Hans, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Bernhard Weßels, Christof Wolf, Simon Henckel, Ina Bieber, and Philipp Scherer. 2015b. “Langfrist-Online-Tracking, Kumulation 2009–2014, Modulfragen (GLES). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln.” ZA5750 Datenfile Version 1.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.12420.
   Google Scholar
• Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Harald Schoen, Bernhard Weßels, Christof Wolf, Simon Henckel, Ina Bieber, and Philipp Scherer. 2016. “Langfrist-Online-Tracking T28 (GLES). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln.” ZA5728 Datenfile Version 2.1.0. doi:10.4232/1.12521.
   Google Scholar
• Sagarzazu, Iñaki, and Heike Klüver. 2017. “Coalition Governments and Party Competition: Political Communication Strategies of Coalition Parties.” Political Science Research and Methods 5 (2): 333–349. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeberg, Henrik Bech, Rune Slothuus, and Rune Stubager. 2016. “Do Voters Learn? Evidence that Voters Respond Accurately to Changes in Political Parties’ Policy Positions.” West European Politics 40 (2): 336–356. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1245902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikano, Susumu, and Franz Urban Pappi. 2004. The Positions of Parties in Ideological and Policy Space: The Perception of German Voters of their Party System. Working Paper of Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, No.73. Mannheim: MZES.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (2): 368–377. doi: 10.2307/1952828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Brug, Wouter. 2004. “Issue Ownership and Party Choice.” Electoral Studies 23 (2): 209–233. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Eva Zeglovits. 2014. “Survey Questions about Party Competence: Insights from Cognitive Interviews.” Electoral Studies 34: 280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Anke Tresch. 2012. “The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 771–782. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2006. “What’s Left and Who’s Right? A Q-Method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences on the Meaning of Ideological Labels.” Political Behavior 28 (2): 151–173. doi: 10.1007/s11109-006-9006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar