721
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

“He’s not my prime minister!”: negative party identification and satisfaction with democracy

&

References

  • Aarts, Kees, and Jacques Thomassen. 2008. “Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter?” Electoral Studies 27 (1): 5–18. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.005
  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81. doi: 10.2307/2952259
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Aida Just. 2013. “Legitimacy From Above: The Partisan Foundations of Support for the Political System in Democracies.” European Political Science Review 5 (3): 335–362. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000082
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Towards Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91–109. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00007
  • Bernauer, Julian, and Adrian Vatter. 2012. “Can’t Get No Satisfaction with the Westminster Model? Winners, Losers and the Effects of Consensual and Direct Democratic Institutions on a Satisfaction with Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 51: 435–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x
  • Blais, André, Alexandre Morin-Chasse, and Shane P. Singh. 2017. “Election Outcomes, Legislative Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Party Politics 23 (2): 85–95. doi: 10.1177/1354068815583200
  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Caruana, Nicholas J., R. Michael McGregor, and Laura B. Stephenson. 2015. “The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 771–789. doi: 10.1017/S0008423914000882
  • Christmann, Pablo, and Mariano Torcal. 2017. “The Effects of Government System Fractionalization on Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Science Research Methods. doi:10.1017/psrm.2017.23.
  • Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 808–822. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2015. CSES Module 3: Full Release [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. www.cses.org. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15.
  • Donovan, Todd, and Jeffrey Karp. 2017. “Electoral Rules, Corruption, Inequality and Evaluations of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 56: 469–486. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12188
  • Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow. 2016. “Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.” www.parlgov.org.
  • Doyle, David, and Robert Elgie. 2016. “Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-National Measures of Presidential Power.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 731–741. doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000465
  • Elgie, Robert. 2017. The Semi-Presidential One. Accessed 20 February 2017. http://www.semipresidentialism.com.
  • Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2010. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
  • Hetherington, Marc J., and Thomas J. Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Iyengar, Shanto, and Masha Krupenkin. 2018. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Political Psychology 39 (51): 201–218. doi: 10.1111/pops.12487
  • Karp, Jeffrey A., and Shaun Bowler. 2003. “Coalition Government and Satisfaction with Democracy: An Analysis of New Zealand’s Reaction to Proportional Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (1): 57–79.
  • Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99 (2): 185–199. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051592
  • Kinder, Donald P., and Nathan P. Kalmoe. 2017. Neither Liberal Nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51–69.
  • Maggiotto, Michael A., and James E. Piereson. 1977. “Partisan Identification and Electoral Choice: The Hostility Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (4): 745–767. doi: 10.2307/2110735
  • Mayer, Sabrina Jasmine. 2017. “How Negative Partisanship Affects Voting Behavior in Europe: Evidence From an Analysis of 17 European Multi-Party Systems with Proportional Voting.” Research & Politics January–March: 1–7.
  • McGregor, R. Michael, Nicholas J. Caruana, and Laura B. Stephenson. 2015. “Negative Partisanship in a Multi-party System: The Case of Canada.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25 (3): 300–316. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2014.997239
  • Medeiros, Mike, and Alain Noël. 2014. “The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (7): 1022–1046. doi: 10.1177/0010414013488560
  • Nadeau, Richard, and Andre Blais. 1993. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 553–563. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006736
  • Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Powell, G. Bingham Jr., and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414. doi: 10.2307/2111378
  • Richardson, Bradley M. 1991. “European Party Loyalties Revisited.” American Political Science Review 85 (3): 751–775. doi: 10.2307/1963849
  • Rose, Richard, and William Mishler. 1998. “Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies 17 (2): 217–234. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X
  • Samuels, David J., and Cesar Zucco. 2018. Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans: Voting Behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Singh, Shane. 2014. “Not All Election Winners are Equal: Satisfaction with Democracy and the Nature of the Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (2): 308–327. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12028
  • Singh, Shane, Ekrem Karakoç, and André Blais. 2012. “Differentiating Winners: How Elections Affect Satisfaction with Democracy.” Electoral Studies 31 (1): 201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.001
  • Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Heike Klüver. 2017. “Does Anybody Notice? How Policy Positions of Coalition Parties are Perceived by Voters.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 115–132. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12169
  • Steenbergen, Marco R., and Bradford S. Jones. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–237. doi: 10.2307/3088424
  • Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1985. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed., edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Transparency International. 2017. Corruption Perceptions Index. Accessed 20 February 2017. https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview.
  • Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wagner, Alexander F., Friedrich Schneider, and Martin Halla. 2009. “The Quality of Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe—A Panel Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (1): 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.08.001
  • Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1992. “Measuring Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 149–166. doi: 10.2307/1964021
  • Whitten, Guy D., and Harvey D. Palmer. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 18 (1): 49–67. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00043-2
  • World Bank. 2017. Annual GDP Growth. Accessed 20 February 2017. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.
  • Zhong, Chen-Bo, Katherine W. Phillips, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, and Adam D. Galinsky. 2008. “Negational Categorization and Intergroup Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (6): 793–806. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315457

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.