Partisanship, sexuality, and perceptions of candidates

References

• Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (1): 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Andersen. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Election Studies, University of Michigan, and Stanford University. ANES 2016 Time Series Study. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-09-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?” Political Behavior 30 (2): 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, Adam J., Gregory A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin G., Thomas J. Hayes, Matthew B. Incantalupo, and Charles Anthony Smith. 2016. “Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes: Are Political Advances in Gay Rights Counterproductive?” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 625–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Paul R. 2014. “Public Opinion About Gay Rights and Gay Marriage.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26 (3): 279–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, David, and Joshua Kalla. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-To-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, Scott, Ryan M. Jewell, and Philip D. Waggoner. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn From Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research and Politics December: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Doan, Alesha E., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2010. “The Role of Intersectional Stereotypes on Evaluations of Gay and Lesbian Political Candidates.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 63–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, Kathleen A. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, Andrew R., and Kenneth Sherrill. 2015. “From Freedom to Equality: Marriage and the Shifted Priorities of Lesbians, Gay Men, Bisexuals, and Transgender People.” In Minority Voting in the United States, edited by Kyle L. Kreider, Thomas J. Baldino, and Santa Barbara, 390–407. CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2003. “When to Tell? Disclosure of Concealable Group Membership, Stereotypes, and Political Evaluation.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Brian, and Melissa Michelson. 2017. Listen, We Need to Talk: How to Change Attitudes about LGBT Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, William, Victor C. Ottati, and Nathaniel D. Krumdick. 2011. “Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Evaluation: A Model of Correction.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick, Rebekah, and Sue Thomas. 1999. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on Citizen Perceptions of Candidate Viability.” In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process: Public Policy, Public Opinion, and Political Representation, edited by Ellen D. B. Riggle, and Barry L. Taklock, 170–191. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, Rebekah, and Sue Thomas. 2001. “Gays and Lesbians in Local Races: A Study of Electoral Viability.” Journal of Homosexuality 42 (1): 103–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, Lilliana Mason, and Lene Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, Connor, and Dustin Tingley. 2015. “‘Who are These People?’ Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 2 (3): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irmen, Lisa. 2006. “Automatic Activation and Use of Gender Subgroups.” Sex Roles 55 (7): 435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Jarrod T., and Eric Loepp. 2018. “My Candidate vs. My Party: Strategic Voting in Primary Elections.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates’ Ideological Orientations?” The Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Ziva, and Paul Thagard. 1996. “Forming Impressions from Stereotypes, Traits, and Behaviors: A Parallel-Constraint-Satisfaction Theory.” Psychological Review 103 (2): 284–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, Jeffrey R., Justin H. Phillips, and Alissa F. Stollwerk. 2014. “Are Survey Respondents Lying About Their Support for Same-Sex Marriage? Lessons from a Recent List Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (2): 510–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, Gabriele, and Andrew Reynolds. 2018. “Candidate Sexual Orientation Didn’t Matter (in the Way You Might Think) in the 2015 UK General Election.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 713–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, Ariel, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2010. “More than Ideology: Conservative—Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues.” Social Justice Research 23 (2/3): 156–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Lilliana. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1): 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, Amy E., and Laura A. Brannon. 2004. “An Examination of Racial Subtypes Versus Subgroups.” Current Research in Social Psychology 9 (8): 109–123.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, Monika L. 2005. “Candidate Occupations and Voter Information Shortcuts.” The Journal of Politics 67 (1): 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Patrick R., and Pamela Johnston Conover. 2015. “Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (2): 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, Kevin J., Thomas J. Leeper, James N. Druckman, and Jeremy Freese. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, Geoffrey D., Carrie Weih, and Jeffrey Tsai. 2010. “Motivated Suspicion: Asymmetrical Attributions of the Behavior of Political Ingroup and Outgroup Members.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 32 (2): 173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, Gabriele, Jesse Chandler, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgment and Decision Making 5 (5): 411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, Shane M. 2018. “Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Attitudes toward Homosexuality.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (September): 628–641.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Andrew. 2013. “Representation and Rights: The Impact of LGBT Legislators in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Zoe, and Miles Hewstone. 2001. “Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (1): 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Monica C., and Angela L. Bos. 2011. “An Exploration of the Content of Stereotypes of Black Politicians.” Political Psychology 32 (2): 205–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Monica C., and Angela L. Bos. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teele, Dawn, Joshua Kalla, and Frances Rosenbluth. 2018. “The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 525–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachary, Paul, and Bethany Albertson. 2017. “Knocked Out? The Electoral Consequences of Politicians’ Disclosure of LGBT Status.” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar