Cross-tier personal gains in mixed electoral systems

References

• Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy Under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 406–433. doi: 10.2307/2111619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, Kathleen. 1999. “Voter Responses to Electoral Complexity: Ticket Splitting, Rational Voters and Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 487–505. doi: 10.1017/S0007123499000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, Kathleen, and Michael Thies. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized Under PR, Plurality, and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 5–32. doi: 10.1177/0951692803151001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth. 2001. “Evaluating Hungary’s Mixed-Member Electoral System.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? edited by Matthew Shugart, and Martin Wattenberg, 477–493. New York,, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, Michael Laver, and Daniela Giannetti. 2004. “Multi-Party Split-Ticket Voting Estimation as an Ecological Inference Problem.” In Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies, edited by Gary King, Ori Rosen, and Martin Tanner, 333–350. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Stephen, and Frank Thames. 2018. “Whither the Seat Bonus? Stand-Down Agreements in Ukraine’s Mixed-Member System.” Party Politics 52 (April): 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Lithuanian (CEC). 2016. Politine˙s kampanijos finansavimo ataskaitu˛ suvestine˙s [Summary of Political Campaign Funding Reports]. Accessed 1 July 2019. https://www.vrk.lt/pk-finansavimo-ataskaitu-suvestine-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ceyhan, Sara. 2018. “Who Runs at the Top of Party Lists? Determinants of Parties’ List Ranking in 2013 German Bundestag Election.” German Politics 27 (1): 66–88. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2017.1320391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Erik. 2005. “Electoral Incentives for Political Corruption Under Open-List Proportional Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67 (3): 716–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary, Frances Rosenbluth, and Michael Thies. 1999. “Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 33–56. doi: 10.1017/S0007123499000022
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Karen, and Leonard Schoppa. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence From Germany, Japan, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (9): 1027–1053. doi: 10.1177/001041402237505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F, Santiago Olivella, Michael Malecki, and Mindy Sher. 2013. “Vote-earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity.” Electoral Studies 32 (4): 658–669. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, Jens Olav. 2016. “You Just Made It: Individual Incumbency Advantage Under Proportional Representation.” Electoral Studies 44: 319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desposato, Scott, and John Petrocik. 2003. “The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 27 (3): 227–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico, and Erik Herron. 2005. “Going it Alone? Strategic Entry Under Mixed Electoral Rules.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 16–31. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron, and Nishikawa Misa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and Its Consequences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Mihail Chiru. 2010. “Practice and Payment: Determinants of Candidate List Position in European Parliament Elections.” European Union Politics 11 (4): 533–552. doi: 10.1177/1465116510380284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, Ron Johnston, and Charles Pattie. 2003. “Split-Ticket Patterns in Mixed-Member Proportional Election Systems: Estimates and Analyses of Their Spatial Variation at the German Federal Election, 1998.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 109–127. doi: 10.1017/S000712340300005X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Shenyang, and Mark Fraser. 2015. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. 2nd Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, and Holger Lutz Kern. 2008. “Incumbency as a Source of Spillover Effects in Mixed Electoral Systems: Evidence From a Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Electoral Studies 27: 213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, William B., and Carol Mershon. 2005. “Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 536–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, Erik. 2001. “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence From Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (2): 361–382.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, Erik S. 2002. “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence From Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (3): 361–382. doi: 10.2307/3598568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, Erik S., and Michael S. Lynch. 2019. “Friends and Neighbors Voting Under Mixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems: Evidence From Lithuania.” Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy 55 (1): 81–89. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2019.1581078
   Google Scholar
• Herron, Erik, and Misa Nishikawa. 2001. “Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed Superposition Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 20 (1): 63–86. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Thomas, and Charles Tidmarch. 1993. “The Effects of Positions on Votes for Incumbents in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (4): 897–909. doi: 10.1177/106591299304600412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, and Richard Nielsen. 2019. “Why Propensity Scores Should Not be Used for Matching.” Political Analysis 27 (4): 435–454. doi: 10.1017/pan.2019.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, Thomas D., and W. David Patterson. 1990. “Comparative Pork Barrel Politics: Perceptions From the West German Bundestag.” Comparative Political Studies 22 (4): 458–477. doi: 10.1177/0010414090022004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LRS: Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. 2017. The Law on Election to the Seimas. Accessed 9 June 2020. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalActPrint/lt?jfwid=5sjolfz5z&documentId=TAIS.1536&category=TAD
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, Ko. 2008. “Re-examining the Contamination Effect of Japan’s Mixed Electoral System Using the Treatment-Effects Model.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 723–731. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, Kamil, and Mary Stegmaier. 2015. “Ballot Position Effects Under Compulsory and Optional Preferential-List PR Electoral Systems.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 465–486. doi: 10.1007/s11109-014-9294-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinussen, Pål E. 2004. “Government Performance and Political Accountability at Subnational Level: The Electoral Fate of Local Incumbents in Norway.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 227–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2004.00105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert. 1999. “Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Post-Communist States.” World Politics 51 (3): 359–384. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100009114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert, and Ethan Scheiner. 2005. “Strategic Ticket Splitting and the Personal Vote in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 259–276. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert, and Ethan Scheiner. 2009. “Strategic Voting in Established and New Democracies: Ticket Splitting in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert, and Ethan Scheiner. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, Carlos, and Marcus André Melo. 2015. “Relecting Corrupt Incumbents in Exchange for Public Goods: Rouba Mas Faz in Brazil.” Latin American Research Review 50 (4): 88–115. doi: 10.1353/lar.2015.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond, Paul, and John Regan. 2015. “Incumbency Advantage in a Proportional Electoral System: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Irish Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 38: 244–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, David. 2001. “When Does Every Penny Count?: Intra-Party Competition and Campaign Finance in Brazil.” Party Politics 7 (1): 89–102. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew Soberg, Melody Ellis Valdini, and Kati Suominen. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–449. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew, and Martin Wattenburg. 2001. “Introduction: The Electoral Reform of the Twenty-First Century?” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, edited by Matthew Shugart, and Martin Wattenburg, 1–6. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steven S., and Thomas F. Remington. 2001. The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, Mary, Kamil Marcinkiewicz, and Michael Jankowski. 2016. “The Effects of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Poland and the Czech Republic.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (4): 885–906. doi: 10.1177/0888325416670240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, Frank C. 2001. “Legislative Voting Behaviour in the Russian Duma: Understanding the Effect of Mandate.” Europe-Asia Studies 53 (6): 869–884. doi: 10.1080/09668130120078531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, Frank C. 2007. “Discipline and Party Institutionalization in Post-Soviet Legislatures.” Party Politics 13 (4): 456–477. doi: 10.1177/1354068807077956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, Frank. 2016. “Electoral Rules and Legislative Parties in the Ukrainian Rada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 35–59. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwan, Roos van der, Marcel Lubbers, and Rob Eisinga. 2019. “The Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities in the Netherlands: Ethnic Minority Candidates and the Role of Party Characteristics.” Acta Politica 54 (2): 245–267. doi: 10.1057/s41269-018-0085-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar