Sex and ideology: liberal and conservative responses to scandal

References

• Alexander, Amy, and Andreas Bågenholm. 2018. “Does Gender Matter? Female Politicians’ Engagement in Anti-corruption Efforts.” In Gender and Corruption, edited by Helena Stensöta and Lena Wängnerud, 171–189. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anduzia, Eva, Aina Gallego, and Jordi Muñoz. 2013. “Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes toward Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1664–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., and Emily Beaulieu. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender 10: 365–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., Emily Beaulieu, and Gregory W. Saxton. 2018. “Restoring Trust in the Police: Why Female Officers Reduce Suspicions of Corruption.” Governance 31: 143–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Tiffany D., Emily Beaulieu, and Gregory W. Saxton. 2020. “Sex and Corruption: How Sexism Shapes Voters’ Responses to Scandal.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole. 2015. “Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support for Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 36 (6): 691–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole. 2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38 (2): 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Nichole. 2020. “Shifting Standards: Voter Evaluations of Female and Male Candidate Qualifications.” Journal of Politics 82 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauhr, Monika, Nicholas Charron, and Lena Wängnerud. 2019. “Exclusion or Interests? Why Females in Elected Office Reduce Petty and Grand Corruption.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (5): 1043–1065.
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, Ryan, Miguel Carreras, and Gregory Love. 2019. “Presidents’ Sex and Popularity: Baselines, Dynamics and Policy Performance.” British Journal of Political Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000364.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, Ryan, Gregory Love, and Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo. 2015. “Cushioning the Fall: Scandals, Economic Conditions, and Executive Approval.” Political Behavior 37 (1): 109–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassese, Erin, and Mirya Holman. 2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 785–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossette, Paulina, and Stephen Craig. 2019. Politicians Behaving Badly. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Marry, and Danielle Popp. 2003. “Sexual Double Standards: A Review and Methodological Critique of Two Decades of Reserach.” Journal of Sex Research 40 (1): 13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, David, Conor Dowling, and Michael Miller. 2011. “Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 749–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, David, Conor Dowling, and Michael Miller. 2014. “Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47: 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers, Andrew, Nick Vivyan, and Markus Wagner. 2018. “Corruption, Accountability, and Gender: Do Female Politicians Face Higher Standards in Public Life?” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esarey, Justin, and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer. 2018. “Women’s Representation, Accountability and Corruption in Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 659–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esarey, Justin, and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer. 2019. “Estimating Causal Relationships between Women’s Representation in Government and Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (11): 1713–1741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, Carolyn. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Behavior 18 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, Kendall, Magda Hinojosa, and Jennifer Piscopo. 2019. “Women to the Rescue: The Gendered Effects of Public Discontent on Legislative Nominations in Latin America.” Party Politics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819856614.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, Peter, and Susan Fiske. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, and Brian Nosek. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan, and Matthew Hersh. 2001. “Sexual Morality: The Cultures and Emotions of Conservatives and Liberals.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (1): 191–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julious, Stephen. 2004. “Using Confidence Intervals Around Individual Means to Assess Statistical Significance between Two Means.” Pharmaceutical Statistics 3: 217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, David, and Richard E. Matland. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 36 (6): 595–612.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Yanna, and Nichole Bauer. 2014. “The Relationship between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context.” Political Behavior 36 (1): 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcinese, Valentino, and Indraneel Sircar. 2017. “Cime and Punishment the British Way: Accountability Channels Following the MP’s Expense Scandal.” European Journal of Political Economy 47: 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, Kevin, Thomas Leeper, James Druckman, and Jeremy Freese. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Housholder, Catherine. 2019. “A Theory of Gender’s Role on Presidential Approval Ratings in Corrupt Times.” Political Research Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensöta, Helena, Lena Wängnerud, and Richard Svensson. 2015. “Gender and Corruption.” Governance 28 (4): 475–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonnahme, Beth. 2014. “Surviving Scandal.” Social Science Quarterly 95 (5): 1308–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, David, and Amy Moreland. 2014. “Perceptions of Corruption and and the Dynamics of Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 10 (3): 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar