Same scandal, different interpretations: politics of corruption, anger, and partisan bias in Mexico

References

• Abelson, R. P. 1995. “The Secret Existence of Expressive Behavior.” Critical Review 9 (1–2): 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar, R., and R. E. Carlin. 2017. “Ideational Populism in Chile? A Case Study.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 404–422. doi:10.1111/spsr:12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and Y. V. Tverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., A. Gallego, and J. Munoz. 2013. “Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies 46: 1664–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, F. J., and R. C. Cornejo. 2020. “Elecciones 2018. Una coyuntura histórica en México.” Política y Gobierno 27: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., and L. Renno. 2019. “Nonpartisans as False Negatives: The Mismeasurement of Party Identification in Public Opinion Surveys.” The Journal of Politics 81 (3): 906–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán, U., S. Ley, and R. Castro Cornejo. 2020. Estudio Nacional Electoral-Mexican Election Study (CIDE-CSES) 2018. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.
   Google Scholar
• Botero, Sandra, Rodrigo Castro Cornejo, Laura Gamboa, Nara Pavao, and David Nickerson. 2015. “Says Who? An Experiment on Allegations of Corruption and Credibility of Sources.” Political Research Quarterly 68: 493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, S., R. C. Cornejo, L. Gamboa, N. Pavao, and D. W. Nickerson. 2019. “Under Friendly Fire: An Experiment on Partisan Press, Fragmented Opposition and Voting Behavior.” Electoral Studies 60: 102044.
   Google Scholar
• Botero, Sandra, Rodrigo Castro Cornejo, Laura Gamboa, Nara Pavao, and David W. Nickerson. 2021. “Are All Types of Wrongdoing Created Equal in the Eyes of Voters?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 31 (2): 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. 2005. "Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions." American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 388–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn, Kathleen. 2012. “To Hell with Your Corrupt Institutions! AMLO and Populism in Mexico.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, edited by Cas Mudde, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, 88–112. New York: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, R. E., G. J. Love, and C. Martinez-Gallardo. 2015. “Cushioning the Fall: Scandals, Economic Conditions, and Executive Approval.” Political Behavior 37: 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Cornejo, R. 2019. “Partisanship and Question-Wording Effects: Experimental Evidence from Latin America.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (1): 26–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Cornejo, R. 2021a. “How do Campaigns Matter? Independents, Political Information, and the Enlightening Role of Campaigns in Mexico.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33 (4): 779–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Cornejo, R. 2021b. “Short-and Long-Term Partisanship: Campaign Effects and the Stability of Party Identification in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 56: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Cornejo, R., S. Ley, and U. Beltrán. 2020. “Anger, Partisanship, and the Activation of Populist Attitudes in Mexico.” Política y Gobierno 27: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornejo, R. C., U. Beltrán, S. Ley, and R. Galicia. 2022. “From Election Day to Presidential Approval: Partisanship and the Honeymoon Period in Mexico.” Electoral Studies 75: 102438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., S. Feldman, and K. Knight. 1987. "The Personal and Political Underpinnings of Economic Forecasts." American Journal of Political Science 559–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2012. "The Politics of Motivation." Critical Review 24 (2): 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., and M. S. Levendusky. 2019. "What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?." Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (1): 114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, A., K. Glinitzer, and T. M. Meyer. 2016. “Corruption Performance Voting and the Electoral Context.” European Political Science Review 8: 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, J., A. Alduncin, C. Krewson, J. A. Sieja, and J. E. Uscinski. 2017. “The Effect of Conspiratorial Thinking and Motivated Reasoning on Belief in Election Fraud.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (4): 933–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Geoffrey, and Robert Andersen. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. J., B. Nyhan, and J. Reifler. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics.” Political Psychology 38: 127–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., J. H. Kuklinski, P. J. Quirk, B. Peyton, and J. Verkuilen. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., and D. P. Green. 1998. "Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes." American Journal of Political Science 794–818.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., and Gregory A. Huber. 2010. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Donald Philip, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Kenneth. 2011. “Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico’s New Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 398–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., S. Feldman, and C. Weber. 2007. "The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity." The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614 (1): 131–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. "Affect, not Ideologya Social Identity Perspective on Polarization." Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., and S. J. Westwood. 2015. "Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization." American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G. C. 2010. "Perception, Memory, and Partisan Polarization on the Iraq War." Political Science Quarterly 125 (1): 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., and J. Barabas. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” The Journal of Politics 74: 672–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. 1991. “Cognition and Motivation in Emotion.” American Psychologist 46 (4): 352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., W. G. Jacoby, H. Norpoth, and H. F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00615.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam. 2015. “Partisanship in Latin America.” In The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, edited by Ryan E. Carlin, Matthew M. Singer, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister, 226–245. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, N., V. Oliveros, and L. Schiumerini. 2019. "Toward a Theory of Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies." Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• MacKuen, M., J. Wolak, L. Keele, and G. E. Marcus. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Edited by Scott Mainwaring and Timothy Scully. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 2003. "The Psychology of Emotion and Politics." In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by  D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis, 182–221. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., K. L. Saunders, and C. E. Farhart. 2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 824–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2021. "Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse." In Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J., E. Anduiza, and A. Gallego. 2016. “Why do Voters Forgive Corrupt Mayors? Implicit Exchange, Credibility of Information and Clean Alternatives.” Local Government Studies 42: 598–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavao, Nara. 2018. “Corruption as the Only Option: The Limits to Electoral Accountability.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 996–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P., A. J. W. Civettini, and R. R. Lau. 2007. “Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, edited by R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, and M. MacKuen, 152–179. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, G., M. Guinjoan, and E. Anduiza. 2017. “The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes.” Swiss Political Science Review 23: 444–461. doi:10.1111/spsr.12261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundquist, B. S., G. S. Strom, and J. G. Peters. 1977. “Corrupt Politicians and Their Electoral Support: Some Experimental Observations.” The American Political Science Review 71 (3): 954–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J. 2012. Party-system Collapse: The Roots of Crisis in Peru and Venezuela. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solaz, H., C. E. De Vries, and R. A. de Geus. 2018. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0010414018797951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M. 2000. "Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political." Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality 67.
   Google Scholar
• Suhay, E., and C. Erisen. 2018. “The Role of Anger in the Biased Assimilation of Political Information.” Political Psychology 39 (4): 793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., and M. Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Ted Brader, Eric W. Groenendyk, Krysha Gregorowicz, and Vincent L. Hutchings. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 156–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, S. B. 2020. “Accepting or Resisting? Citizen Responses to Corruption Across Varying Levels of Competence and Corruption Prevalence.” Political Studies 68 (3): 653–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, Jessica Tarlov, and Nick Vivyan. 2014. “Partisan Bias in Opinion Formation on Episodes of Political Controversy: Evidence from Great Britain.” Political Studies 62 (1): 136–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.” Journal of Communication 65 (4): 699–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz-Shapiro, R., and M. S. Winters. 2017. “Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 60–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M. S., and R. Weitz-Shapiro. 2013. “Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption: When do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians?” Comparative Politics 45: 418–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, E. J., and D. Zizumbo-Colunga. 2013. “The Varying Political Toll of Concerns About Corruption in Good Versus Bad Economic Times.” Comparative Political Studies 46: 1190–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar