Can insider be outsider? Doing an ethnographic research in a familiar setting

References

• Aguilar, J. L. 1981. “Insider Research: An Ethnography of a Debate.” In Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One's own Society, edited by D. A. Messerschmidt, 15–26. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alothman, F. H. 2016. “Implementing an Early Childhood Curriculum in Different Cultural Contexts: an Ethnographic Study of Arabic Early Literacy Practices in a Saudi Arabian Preschool.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. 1998. “The Lives and Values of Researchers: Implications for Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society.” Educational Researcher 27 (7): 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, R., and C. Bath. 2014. “The Importance of Familiarisation When Doing Research with Young Children.” Ethnography and Education 9 (2): 182–195.
   Google Scholar
• BERA (British Educational Research Association). 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Betül-Çelik, A. 2005. “‘I Miss My Village!’: Forced Kurdish Migrants in Istanbul and Their Representation in Associations.” New Perspectives on Turkey 32: 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, C. 2008. “Conceptualizing from the Inside: Advantages, Complications, and Demands on Insider Positionality.” The Qualitative Report 13 (3): 474–494.
   Google Scholar
• Chimbutane, F. 2012. “The Advantages of Research in Familiar Locales, Viewed from the Perspectives of Researcher and Researched: Reflections on Ethnographic Fieldwork in Mozambique.” In Multilingualism, Discourse, and Ethnography, edited by S. Gardner, and M. Martin-Jones, 288–304. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. A. 2008. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others (2nd Edn). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S. 1975. “Participant Observation and Educational Anthropology.” Research Intelligence 1 (1): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, B., and C. Huf. 2020. “Ethnographic Research in Childhood Institutions: Participations and Entanglements.” Ethnography and Education, doi:10.1080/17457823.2020.1722951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duch, H., and A. Rasmussen. 2020. “Familiarity and Distance in Ethnographic Fieldwork: Field Positions and Relations in Adult Education.” Ethnography and Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/17457823.2020.1760910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S. C., and J. L. Buckler. 2009. “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” The International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1): 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 1994. “Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 70–82. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, E., and M. Ruby. 2011. “The ‘Insider/Outsider’ Dilemma of Ethnography: Working with Young Children and Their Families in Cross-Cultural Contexts.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 9 (2): 162–174.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., E. E. Namey, and M. L. Mitchell. 2013. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, F. B. 2009. “We Thought you Would be White: Race and Gender in Fieldwork.” American Political Science Association 42 (2): 291–294.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. L. Anderson. 2015. The Action Research Dissertation: a Guide for Students and Faculty. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, R. V. 2002. “The Risk of ‘Going Observationalist’: Negotiating the Hidden Dilemmas of Being an Insider Participant Observer.” Qualitative Research 2 (1): 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D., and J. J. Schensul. 1999. Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P. 2015. “Interpretive Reflexivity in Ethnography.” Ethnography 0 (0): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, W. G. 2020. “What’s in a Name? The Power of the English Language in Secondary School Science Education.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 15: 287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannay, D., and J. Creaghan. 2016. “Similarity and Familiarity: Reflections on Indigenous Ethnography with Mothers, Daughters and School Teachers on the Margins of Contemporary Wales.” In Gender, Power and Subjectivity: Reflections on Research Relationships in the Field, edited by M. Ward, 85–103, Studies in Qualitative Methods. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• McKeganey, N., and M. Bloor. 1991. “Spotting the Invisible man: The Influence of Male Gender on Fieldwork Relations.” The British Journal of Sociology 42 (2): 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miled, N. 2019. “Muslim Researcher Researching Muslim Youth: Reflexive Notes on Critical Ethnography, Positionality and Representation.” Ethnography and Education 14 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. 2005. Basic Education in Turkey: Background Report. www.oecd.org/edu/reviews/nationalpolicies.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. 2020. Milli Egitim istatistikleri: örgün egitim [Statistics of National Education: Formal Education]. Ankara: A Publication of Official Statistics Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Mullings, B. 1999. “Insider or Outsider, Both or Neither: Some Dilemmas of Interviewing in a Cross-Cultural Setting.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 30: 337–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naples, N. A. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nero, S. 2015. “Language, Identity, and Insider/Outsider Positionality in Caribbean Creole English Research.” Applied Linguistics Review 6 (3): 341–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Education Policy Outlook: Turkey. Accessed January 8, 2020. http://www.oecd.org/edu/EDUCATION%20POLICY%20OUTLOOK%20TURKEY_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. 2009. Key Concepts in Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, C., and M. Morrison. 2003. Ethnography for Education. Berkshire: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Roald, A. S. 2001. Women in Islam: the Western Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. 2015. “‘Inside’ and ‘Outside’ of What or Where? Researching Migration Through Multi-Positionalities.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung 16 (2), Art. 17. doi:10.17169/fqs-16.2.2333.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, S. M., and J. Parker Webster. 2018. “Positionality and Standpoint: Situated Ethnographers Acting in on and Offline Contexts.” In The Wiley Handbook of Ethnography of Education, edited by D. Beach, C. A. Bagley, and S. Margues da Silva, 501–513. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Soltero-González, L. 2009. “Preschool Latino Immigrant Children: Using the Home Language as a Resource for Literacy Learning.” Theory Into Practice 48: 283–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., and L. Greer. 1981. “Ethnographers in Their Own Cultures: Two Appalachian Cases.” Human Organization 40 (2): 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troman, G. 2001. “Does Gender Make a Difference? A Male Researcher's Reflexive Account of Gendered Fieldwork Relations in Ethnographic Work on Stress in Teaching.” Studies in Educational Ethnography 3: 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Vanner, C. 2015. “Positionality at the Center: Constructing an Epistemological and Methodological Approach for a Western Feminist Doctoral Candidate Conducting Research in the Postcolonial.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14: 1–12. doi:10.1177/1609406915618094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. B. 1988. Gender Issues in Field Research. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. B., and J. K. Hackney. 2000. Gender Issues in Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. 2006. “So What Exactly Do Teacher- Researchers Think About Doing Research?” Support for Learning 21 (1): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, M. C. 2016. “Multiple Positionality and Intersectionality: Towards a Dialogical Social Work Approach.” In Diversity and Social Work in Canada, edited by A. Al-Krenawi, J. R. Graham, and N. Habibov, 114–138. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, W. L. 2010. “Ethnographic Positioning in a Boarding House Setting.” Ethnography and Education 5 (1): 111–122. doi:10.1080/17457821003768505.
   Google Scholar
• Zulfikar, T. 2014. “Researching My Own Backyard: Inquiries into an Ethnographic Study.” Ethnography and Education 9 (3): 373–386.
   Google Scholar