Feeling the unseen: imagined touch perceptions in paranormal reality television

References

• Avram, H., and C. Turcus, eds. 2014. EKPHRASIS: Images, Cinema, Theory, Media 12 (2). doi:10.24193/ekphrasis.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J.M. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2001. Hearing Voices: Embodiment and Experience. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2008. The Body: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. Los Angeles: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446288153.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. 2015. “Researching Affect and Embodied Hauntologies: Exploring an Analytics of Experimentation.” In Affective Methodologies: Developing Cultural Research Strategies for the Study of Affect, edited by B.T. Knudsen and C. Stage, 25–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137483195_2.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, C., and C.D. Murray. 2010. “‘We All Had an Experience in There Together:’ A Discursive Psychological Analysis of Collaborative Paranormal Accounts by Paranormal Investigation Team Members.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 7 (1): 21–33. doi:10.1080/14780880903304543.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 1993. Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2012. The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch. Champaign: University of Illinois Press. doi:10.5406/illinois/9780252034930.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Clüver, C. 1997. “Ekphrasis Reconsidered: On Verbal Representations of Non-Verbal Texts.” In Interart Poetics: Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media, edited by U.-B. Lagerroth, H. Lund, and E. Hedling, 19–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, S. 2004. “Edison’s Teeth; Touching Hearing.” In Hearing Cultures: Essays on Sound, Listening, and Modernity, edited by V. Erlmann, 153–172. Oxford: Berg. doi:10.5040/9781474214865.ch-008.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, D. 2008. “On the Very Idea of a ‘Specific’ Medium: Michael Fried and Stanley Cavell on Painting and Photography as Arts.” Critical Inquiry 34 (2): 274–312. doi:10.1086/529058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, M.A. 2015. “‘Give us a Sign of Your Presence:’ Paranormal Investigation as a Spiritual Practice.” Sociology of Religion 76 (4): 389–412. doi:10.1093/socrel/srv031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., ed. 2007. Technologies of Intuition. Toronto: Y Y Z Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A.F. 2008. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, C. 1940. “Towards a Newer Laocoön.” Partisan Review 7 (4): 296–310.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., and G.J. Seigworth, eds. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822393047.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. 2010. “Genesis of the Media Concept.” Critical Inquiry 36 (2): 321–362. doi:10.1086/648528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, J.A.W. 1993. Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller-Roazen, D. 2007. The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A. 2011. Paranormal Media: Audiences, Spirits and Magic in Popular Culture. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203836392.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D., ed. 2004. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D., ed. 2009. The Sixth Sense Reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D., and C. Classen. 2013. Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. Oxon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315856032.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K.B., ed. 2011. A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203357255.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C.A. 2006. “The Mediated Sensorium.” In Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, edited by C.A. Jones, 5–49. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. [1798] 1996. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. V.L. Dowdell. Revised and edited by H.H. Rudnick. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, B.T., and C. Stage, eds. 2015. Affective Methodologies: Developing Cultural Research Strategies for the Study of Affect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137483195.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, P. 2007. “Paranormal Belief and the Avowal of Prior Scepticism.” Theory and Psychology 17 (5): 681–696. doi:10.1177/0959354307081624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhé, C. 2017. “Visual Touch. Ekphrasis and Interactive Art Installations.” In Museums in a Digital Culture: How Art and Heritage Become Meaningful, edited by C. van den Akker and S. Legêne, 31–40. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.1515/9789048524808-004.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L.U. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822381372.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.J.T. 1994. Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S.G., A. Kablitz, and A. Calhoun, eds. 2008. Rethinking the Medieval Senses: Heritage Fascinations Frames. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, D., M. Paterson, and J.E. Archer. 2017. “Haptic Media Studies.” New Media & Society 19 (10): 1513–1522. doi:10.1177/1461444817717518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. 2007. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Oxford: Berg. doi:10.5040/9781474215831.
   Google Scholar
• Rajewsky, I.O. 2005. “Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality.” Intermédialités 6: 43–64. doi:10.7202/1005505ar.
   Google Scholar
• Rippl, G., ed. 2015. Handbook of Intermediality: Literature – Image – Sound – Music. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110311075.
   Google Scholar
• Roby, C. 2016. Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139924849.
   Google Scholar
• Sconce, J. 2000. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. 2007. Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting and Touching in History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toikkanen, J. 2013. The Intermedial Experience of Horror: Suspended Failures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137299093.
   Google Scholar
• Toikkanen, J. 2015. “Transcendental Puppets: Kant and Kleist.” In The Poetics of Transcendence, edited by E. Heinämäki, P.M. Mehtonen, and A. Salminen, 159–178. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi. doi:10.1163/9789401212090_009.
   Google Scholar
• Toikkanen, J. 2017. “Auditory Images in Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The Tell-Tale Heart’.” The Edgar Allan Poe Review 18 (1): 39–53. doi:10.5325/edgallpoerev.18.1.0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troscianko, E.T. 2014. Kafka’s Cognitive Realism. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203082591.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and Emotion. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yacobi, T. 1997. “Verbal Frames and Ekphrastic Figuration.” In Interart Poetics: Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media, edited by U.-B. Lagerroth, H. Lund, and E. Hedling, 19–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar