Why Are You Dating Him? Contemporary Motives for Workplace Romances

References

• Cowan, R. L., & Horan, S. M. (2014). Love at the office? Understanding workplace romance disclosures and reactions from the coworker perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 238–253. doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.866688
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Broetzmann, S. M. (1989). Romantic relationships at work: Perceived changes in job-related behaviors as a function of participant's motive, partner's motive, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 93–110. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Hale, J. L., & Segrin, C. (1994). Close relationships in task environments: Perceptions of relational types, illicitness, and power. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 227–255. doi:10.1177/0893318994007003001
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). Historical trends in the patterns of time use of young adults. In F. F. Furstenberg, R. G. Rumbaut, & R. A. SettersenJr. (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research and public policy (pp. 150–176). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50, 481–489. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023068.49352.4b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2009). When work and love mix: Perceptions of peers in workplace romances. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 349–369. doi:10.1080/10570310903279042
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2011). Understanding work-life blending: Credibility implications for those who date at work. Communication Studies, 62, 563–580. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.582663
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2013). Relational implications of gay and lesbian workplace romances: Implications for trust, deception, and credibility. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 170–189. doi:10.1177/0021943612474993
   Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., Horan, S. M., & Furler, L. (2008). Dating in the fast lane: How communication predicts speed-dating success. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 749–768. doi:10.1177/0265407508093787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindloff, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Malachowski, C. C., Chory, R. M., & Claus, C. J. (2012). Mixing pleasure with work: Employee perceptions of and response to workplace romance. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 358–379. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.656215
   Google Scholar
• Mano, R., & Gabriel, Y. (2006). Workplace romances in cold and hot organizational climates: The experience of Israel and Taiwan. Human Relations, 59, 7–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, L. L., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2006). Analysis and improvement of the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Communication Quarterly, 54, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P., Serewicz, M. C. M., & Thorrien, L. F. (2004). Goals for cross-sex first dates: Identification, measurement, and the influence of contextual factors. Communication Monographs, 71, 121–147. doi:10.1080/036377504233130251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. (2006). 2006 Workplace romance: Poll findings. SHRM Research. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/searchcenter/Pages/Results.aspx?k=workplace%20romance
   Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H. (1996). Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 5–32. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<5::AID-JOB734>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E. (1977). Coping with cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 30–45. doi:10.2307/2391744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1971). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellenbarger, S. (2004, February 19). Office romance: The challenges of mixing business and pleasure. The Wall Street Journal, p. D1.
   Google Scholar
• Shellenbarger, S. (2010, February 10). For office romance, the secret's out. The Wall Street Journal, p. D1.
   Google Scholar
• SIOP–Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology. (2012). Romance in the office is common occurrence. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/Media/News/office_romance.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar