References
- BBDO, New York. (2017). Retrived from http://www.amvbbdo.com/work/campaign/snickers/yourenotyouwhenyourehungry
- Brummett, B. (2011). Rhetoric in popular culture. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
- Butler, J. G. (2002). Television: Critical methods and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Carveth, R., & Ferraris, C. (2007). “Afterthekiss.com is no valentine gift”: Snickers’ super bowl ad and Benoit’s image restoration discourse. Paper presented at the NCA convention. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=59d33dde-ad6d-4d94-8d45-6408e96dcb59%40sessionmgr102&hid=102
- Cassidy, M. F. (2011). My students and Betty White: American television history in the classroom. Cinema Journal, 50, 86–88. doi:10.1353/cj.2011.0042
- Creamer, M., & Parekh, R. (2008). How to cut through but not offend? Verizon, Snickers latest to fail test. Advertising Age, 79(29), 3–30.
- D’Angelo, F. J. (2010). The rhetoric of intertextuality. Rhetoric Review, 29, 31–47. doi:10.1080/07350190903415172
- Elliott, S. (2013, February 19). Candy aims print ads at consumers ‘hungry’ for redemption. NYTimes. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/13an8dS
- Feng, D., & Wignell, P. (2011). Intertextual voices and engagement in TV advertisements. Visual Communication, 10, 565–588. doi:10.1177/1470357211415788
- Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. New York, NY: Methuen.
- Garfield, B. (2005). What do Snickers and Phils share? A stupid idea. Advertising Age, 76(18), 63.
- Gray, J. (2005). Television teaching: Parody, The Simpsons, and media literacy education. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 22, 223–238. doi:10.1080/07393180500201652
- Gray, J. (2006). Watching with the Simpsons: Television, parody, and intertextuality. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hitchon, J. C., & Jura, J. O. (1997). Allegorically speaking: Intertextuality of the postmodern culture and its impact on print and television advertising. Communication Studies, 48, 142–158. doi:10.1080/10510979709368497
- Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34-61). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Nemcokova, K. (2014, June). Multigeneric intertextuality in advertising: Discourse strategy from a cognitive perspective. Topics in Linguistics, 13, 1–9. doi:10.2478/toppling-2014-0006
- O’Leary, N. (2015, February 2). Snickers’ Brady Bunch wins first super Clio for the best in the big game. Adweek. [on-line]. Available:https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/snickers-brady-bunch-ad-wins-first-super-clio-best-spot-big-game-162736/
- Panigrahi, D., & Chandra, N. D. R. (2013). Intertextuality in advertising. Language in India, 13(9), 251–263.
- Salama, A. H. Y. (2012). The rhetoric of collocational, intertextual and institutional pluralization in Obama’s Cairo speech: A discourse-analytical approach. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 211–229. doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.688296
- Schor, J. B., & Ford, M. (2007). From tastes great to cool: Children’s food marketing and the rise of the symbolic. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 35, 10–21. doi:10.1111j.1748-720x.2007.00110.x
- York, E. B. (2010). Snickers uses humor to satisfy generations of hunger. Advertising Age, 81(13), 22.