Progress with modeling activity landscapes in drug discovery

References

• Cherkasov A, Muratov E, Fourches D, et al. QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? J Med Chem. 2014;57:4977–5010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassermann A, Wawer M, Bajorath J. Activity landscape representations for structure- activity relationship analysis. J Med Chem. 2010;53:8209–8223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulton A, Bellis L, Bento A, et al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40:D1100–D1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson M, Liu T, Baitaluk M, et al. BindingDB in 2015: a public database for medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry and systems pharmacology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1045–D1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Vogt M, Maggiora G, et al. Comparison of bioactive chemical space networks generated using substructure- and fingerprint-based measures of molecular similarity. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2015;29:595–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Maggiora GM, Editors. Concepts and applications of molecular similarity. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Willett P, Barnard J, Downs G. Chemical similarity searching. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1998;38:983–996.
   Google Scholar
• Maggiora G, Vogt M, Stumpfe D, et al. Molecular similarity in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2014;57:3186–3204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender A, Jenkins J, Scheiber J, et al. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49:108–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajorath J, Peltason L, Wawer M, et al. Navigating structure–activity landscapes. Drug Discovery Today. 2009;14:698–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajorath J. Modeling of activity landscapes for drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2012;7:463–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Methods for SAR visualization. RSC Adv. 2012;2:369–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Visualization of activity landscapes and chemogenomics data. Mol Inf. 2013;32:954–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Franco J, Navarrete-Vázquez G, Méndez-Lucio O. Activity and property landscape modeling is at the interface of chemoinformatics and medicinal chemistry. Future Med Chem. 2015;7:1197–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Recent developments in SAR visualization. MedChemComm. 2016;7:1045–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Franco J, Martínez-Mayorga K, Bender A, et al. Characterization of activity landscapes using 2D and 3D similarity methods: consensus activity cliffs. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49:477–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yongye A, Byler K, Santos R, et al. Consensus models of activity landscapes with multiple chemical, conformer, and property representations. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:1259–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Vogt M, Maggiora G, et al. Design of chemical space networks using a Tanimoto similarity variant based upon maximum common substructures. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2015;29:937–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny PW, Sadowski J. Structure modification in chemical databases. In: Oprea TI, editor. Chemoinformatics in drug discovery. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2004. p. 271− 285.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Hu Y, Vogt M, et al. MMP-cliffs: systematic identification of activity cliffs on the basis of matched molecular pairs. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:1138–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Dimova D, Bajorath J. Composition and topology of activity cliff clusters formed by bioactive compounds. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain J, Rea C. Computationally efficient algorithm to identify matched molecular pairs (MMPs) in large data sets. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50:339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggiora G. On outliers and activity cliffs - why QSAR often disappoints. J Chem Inf Model. 2006;46:1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Exploring activity cliffs in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2012;55:2932–2942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Hu Y, Dimova D, et al. Recent progress in understanding activity cliffs and their utility in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2014;57:18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Monteagudo M, Medina-Franco J, Perez-Castillo Y, et al. Activity cliffs in drug discovery: Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde? Drug Discov Today. 2014;19:1069–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajorath J. Exploring activity cliffs from a chemoinformatics perspective. Mol Inf. 2014;33:438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimova D, Bajorath J. Advances in activity cliff research. Mol Inf. 2016;35:181–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajorath J. Representation and identification of activity cliffs. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2017;12:879–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugasundaram V, Maggiora GM. Characterizing property and activity landscapes using an information-theoretic approach [abstract no. 77]. Proceedings of 222nd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Division of Chemical Information; 26–30 August 2001; Chicago, IL. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson D, Cramer R, Ferguson A, et al. Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of molecular diversity descriptors. J Med Chem. 1996;39:3049–3059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer P, Stumpfe D, Vogt M, et al. Activity landscapes, information theory, and structure–activity relationships. Mol Inf. 2013;32:421–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveja J, Medina-Franco J. Activity landscape of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors bridges chemoinformatics with epigenetic drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2015;10:1059–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveja J, Cortes-Bentez F, Bratoeff E, et al. Activity landscape analysis of novel 5α-reductase inhibitors. Mol Diversity. 2016;20:771–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Medina M, Méndez-Lucio O, Medina-Franco J. Activity landscape plotter: a web-based application for the analysis of structure-activity relationships. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:397–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Villanueva J, Santos R, Hernandez-Campos A, et al. Towards a systematic characterization of the antiprotozoal activity landscape of benzimidazole derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:7380–7391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett P. Combination of similarity rankings using data fusion. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt M, Iyer P, Maggiora G, et al. Conditional probabilities of activity landscape features for individual compounds. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1602–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayastha S, Dimova D, Iyer P, et al. Large-scale assessment of activity landscape feature probabilities of bioactive compounds. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:442–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Vogt M, Bajorath J. Design of an activity landscape view taking compound-based feature probabilities into account. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2014;28:919–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez-Lucio O, Perez-Villanueva J, Castillo R, et al. Identifying activity cliff generators of PPAR ligands using SAS maps. Mol Inf. 2012;31:837–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Villanueva J, Mendez-Lucio O, Soria-Arteche O, et al. Activity cliffs and activity cliff generators based on chemotype-related activity landscapes. Mol Diversity. 2015;19:1021–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Monteagudo M, Medina-Franco J, Perera-Sardiña Y, et al. Probing the hypothesis of SAR continuity restoration by the removal of activity cliffs generators in QSAR. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22:5043–5056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Franco J. Scanning structure–activity relationships with structure–activity similarity and related maps: from consensus activity cliffs to selectivity switches. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:2485–2493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell J, Medina-Franco J. Bioactivity landscape modeling: chemoinformatic characterization of structure-activity relationships of compounds tested across multiple targets. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20:5443–5452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha R, Van Drie J. Structure–activity landscape index: identifying and quantifying activity cliffs. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48:646–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltason L, Bajorath J. SAR index: quantifying the nature of structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem. 2007;50:5571–5578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wawer M, Peltason L, Weskamp N, et al. Structure-activity relationship anatomy by network-like similarity graphs and local structure-activity relationship indices. J Med Chem. 2008;51:6075–6084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha R, Medina-Franco J. On the validity versus utility of activity landscapes: are all activity cliffs statistically significant? J. Cheminf. 2014;6:11.
   Google Scholar
• Santos R, Giulianotti M, Houghten R, et al. Conditional probabilistic analysis for prediction of the activity landscape and relative compound activities. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:2613–2625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Peltason L, Iyer P, Bajorath J. Rationalizing three-dimensional activity landscapes and the influence of molecular representations on landscape topology and the formation of activity cliffs. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50:1021–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton G, Roweis S. Stochastic neighbor embedding. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 15 (NIPS 2002). S. Becker, S. Thrun and K. Obermayer (Eds). 2003. p. 857–864.
   Google Scholar
• Agrafiotis D. Stochastic proximity embedding. J Comput Chem. 2003;24:1215–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutlinger M, Guba W, Martin R, et al. Neighborhood-preserving visualization of adaptive structure-activity landscapes: application to drug discovery. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:11633–11636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer P, Wawer M, Bajorath J. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional activity landscape representations for different compound data sets. Med Chem Commun. 2011;2:113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer P, Hu Y, Bajorath J. SAR monitoring of evolving compound data sets using activity landscapes. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:532–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer P, Bajorath J. Representation of multi-target activity landscapes through target pair-based compound encoding in self-organizing maps. Chem Biol & Drug Des. 2011;78:778–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Vega de Leon A, Bajorath J. Design of a three-dimensional multitarget activity landscape. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:2876–2883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kireeva N, Baskin I, Gaspar H, et al. Generative topographic mapping (GTM): universal tool for data visualization, structure-activity modeling and dataset comparison. Mol Inf. 2012;31:301–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorov P, Gaspar H, Marcou G, et al. Mappability of drug-like space: towards a polypharmacologically competent map of drug-relevant compounds. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2015;29:1087–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar H, Baskin I, Marcou G, et al. Chemical data visualization and analysis with incremental generative topographic mapping: big data challenge. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55:84–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayastha S, Horvath D, Gilberg E, et al. Privileged structural motif detection and analysis using generative topographic maps. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:1218–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorov P, Viira B, Davioud-Charvet E, et al. QSAR modeling and chemical space analysis of antimalarial compounds. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2017;31:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar H, Baskin I, Marcou G, et al. GTM-based QSAR models and their applicability domains. Mol Inf. 2015;34:348–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar H, Baskin I, Marcou G, et al. Stargate GTM: bridging descriptor and activity spaces. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55:2403–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltason L, Hu Y, Bajorath J. From structure-activity to structure-selectivity relationships: quantitative assessment, selectivity cliffs, and key compounds. ChemMedChem. 2009;4:1864–1873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounkine E, Wawer M, Wassermann A, et al. SARANEA: a freely available program to mine structure- activity and structure- selectivity relationship information in compound data sets. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimova D, Wawer M, Wassermann A, et al. Design of multitarget activity landscapes that capture hierarchical activity cliff distributions. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggiora G, Bajorath J. Chemical space networks: a powerful new paradigm for the description of chemical space. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2014;28:795–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwierzyna M, Vogt M, Maggiora G, et al. Design and characterization of chemical space networks for different compound data sets. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2015;29:113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Vogt M, Maggiora G, et al. Design of chemical space networks on the basis of Tversky similarity. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2016;30:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt M, Stumpfe D, Maggiora G, et al. Lessons learned from the design of chemical space networks and opportunities for new applications. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2016;30:191–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimoto R, Vogt M, Bajorath J. Maximum common substructure-based Tversky index: an asymmetric hybrid similarity measure. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2016;30:523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimoto R, Bajorath J. Exploring sets of molecules from patents and relationships to other active compounds in chemical space networks. J Comput-Aided Mol Des. 2017;31:779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Vega de Leуn A, Bajorath J. Chemical space visualization: transforming multidimensional chemical spaces into similarity-based molecular networks. Future Med Chem. 2016;8:1769–1778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruchterman T, Reingold E. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience. 1991;21:1129–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman M. Networks: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Noack A. Modularity clustering is force-directed layout. Phys Rev E. 2009;79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Vega de León A, Bajorath J. Design of chemical space networks incorporating compound distance relationships. F1000Research. 2016;5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamada T, Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf Process Lett. 1989;31:7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimova D, Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Method for the evaluation of structure-activity relationship information associated with coordinated activity cliffs. J Med Chem. 2014;57:6553–6563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Activity cliff networks for medicinal chemistry. Drug Dev Res. 2014;75:291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimova D, Bajorath J. Extraction of SAR information from activity cliff clusters via matching molecular series. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;87:454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassermann A, Haebel P, Weskamp N, et al. SAR matrices: automated extraction of information-rich SAR tables from large compound data sets. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:1769–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wawer M, Bajorath J. Similarity-potency trees: a method to search for SAR information in compound data sets and derive SAR rules. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50:1395–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta-Ostermann D, Hu Y, Bajorath J. Introducing the LASSO graph for compound data set representation and structure-activity relationship analysis. J Med Chem. 2012;55:5546–5553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha R. Exploring uncharted territories: predicting activity cliffs in structure-activity landscapes. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:2181–2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikamp K, Hu X, Yan A, et al. Prediction of activity cliffs using support vector machines. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52:2354–2365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namasivayam V, Iyer P, Bajorath J. Prediction of individual compounds forming activity cliffs using emerging chemical patterns. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:3131–3139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath D, Marcou G, Varnek A, et al. Prediction of activity cliffs using condensed graphs of reaction representations, descriptor decombination, support vector machine classification, and support vector regression. J Chem Inf Model. 2016;56:1631–1640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisius B, Vogt M, Bajorath J. Development of a fingerprint reduction approach for Bayesian similarity searching based on Kullback-Leibler divergence analysis. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49:1347–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt M, Bajorath J. Similarity searching for potent compounds using feature selection. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1613–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer P, Stumpfe D, Bajorath J. Molecular mechanism-based network-like similarity graphs reveal relationships between different types of receptor ligands and structural changes that determine agonistic, inverse-agonistic, and antagonistic effects. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:1281–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar