The effect of visual and tactile information in motor preparation of climbing

References

• Bläsing, B. E., Güldenpenning, I., Koester, D., & Schack, T. (2014). Expertise affects representation structure and categorical activation of grasp postures in climbing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschker, M. S., Bakker, F. C., & Michaels, C. F. (2002). Memory for the functional characteristics of climbing walls: Perceiving affordances. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(1), 25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, R., Halaki, M., Vanwanseele, B., & Clarke, J. (2011). Measuring lifting forces in rock climbing: Effect of hold size and fingertip structure. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 27(1), 40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordier, P., France, M. M., Pailhous, J., & Bolon, P. (1994). Entropy as a global variable of the learning process. Human Movement Science, 13(6), 745–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danion, F. (2008). Grip force safety margin in rock climbers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(02), 168–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuss, F. K., Burr, L., Weizman, Y., & Niegl, G. (2013). Measurement of the coefficient of friction and the centre of pressure of a curved surface of a climbing handhold. Procedia Engineering, 60, 491–495.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 31(3), 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14, S103–S109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzulo, G., Barca, L., Bocconi, A. L., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers. Brain and Cognition, 73(1), 68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijpers, J. R., Oudejans, R. R., & Bakker, F. C. (2007). Changes in the perception of action possibilities while climbing to fatigue on a climbing wall. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(1), 97–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. D., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection. Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Motor representation and control, attention and performance XIII (pp. 321–342). Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, X., Lambert, P., Jones, G., & Llewellyn, D. J. (2012). Efficacy of pre-ascent climbing route visual inspection in indoor sport climbing. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22(1), 67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegelke, C., & Hughes, C. M. (2015). The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences. Brain and Cognition, 101, 12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, L., Cordier, R., Orth, D., Courtine, Y., & Croft, J. L. (2017). Role of route previewing strategies on climbing fluency and exploratory movements. PloS one, 12(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, S. D., Macdonald, S. N., Culham, J. C., & Snow, J. C. (2016). Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures? Experimental Brain Research, 234(4), 963–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugi, T., & Ishihara, M. (2019). The effect of route presentation and climbing strategy in competitive bouldering: The relation between observation and memorization of the route. Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology, 46(2), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingerhoets, G., Vandamme, K., & Vercammen, A. (2009). Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition, 69, 481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, M. M., Pointon, G. D., Tarampi, M. R., & Rand, K. M. (2019). Expertise effects on the perceptual and cognitive tasks of indoor rock climbing. Memory & Cognition, 48, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar